Literature DB >> 25479254

Evaluation of bias and variance in low-count OSEM list mode reconstruction.

Y Jian1, B Planeta, R E Carson.   

Abstract

Statistical algorithms have been widely used in PET image reconstruction. The maximum likelihood expectation maximization reconstruction has been shown to produce bias in applications where images are reconstructed from a relatively small number of counts. In this study, image bias and variability in low-count OSEM reconstruction are investigated on images reconstructed with MOLAR (motion-compensation OSEM list-mode algorithm for resolution-recovery reconstruction) platform. A human brain ([(11)C]AFM) and a NEMA phantom are used in the simulation and real experiments respectively, for the HRRT and Biograph mCT. Image reconstructions were repeated with different combinations of subsets and iterations. Regions of interest were defined on low-activity and high-activity regions to evaluate the bias and noise at matched effective iteration numbers (iterations × subsets). Minimal negative biases and no positive biases were found at moderate count levels and less than 5% negative bias was found using extremely low levels of counts (0.2 M NEC). At any given count level, other factors, such as subset numbers and frame-based scatter correction may introduce small biases (1-5%) in the reconstructed images. The observed bias was substantially lower than that reported in the literature, perhaps due to the use of point spread function and/or other implementation methods in MOLAR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25479254      PMCID: PMC4823773          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/1/15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  19 in total

1.  Reducing loss of image quality because of the attenuation artifact in uncorrected PET whole-body images.

Authors:  Johan Nuyts; Sigrid Stroobants; Patrick Dupont; Stefaan Vleugels; Patrick Flamen; Luc Mortelmans
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  B W Jakoby; Y Bercier; M Conti; M E Casey; B Bendriem; D W Townsend
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  AB-OSEM reconstruction for improved Patlak kinetic parameter estimation: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jeroen Verhaeghe; Andrew J Reader
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Iterative reconstruction techniques in emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Jinyi Qi; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Comparison of image-derived and arterial input functions for estimating the rate of glucose metabolism in therapy-monitoring 18F-FDG PET studies.

Authors:  Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Eric P Visser; Paul F M Krabbe; Bas A van Hoorn; Emile B Koenders; Antoon T Willemsen; Jan Pruim; Frans H M Corstens; Wim J G Oyen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data.

Authors:  H M Hudson; R S Larkin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography.

Authors:  L A Shepp; Y Vardi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography.

Authors:  K Lange; R Carson
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  List-mode reconstruction for the Biograph mCT with physics modeling and event-by-event motion correction.

Authors:  Xiao Jin; Chung Chan; Tim Mulnix; Vladimir Panin; Michael E Casey; Chi Liu; Richard E Carson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Tracer kinetic modeling of [(11)C]AFM, a new PET imaging agent for the serotonin transporter.

Authors:  Mika Naganawa; Nabeel Nabulsi; Beata Planeta; Jean-Dominique Gallezot; Shu-Fei Lin; Soheila Najafzadeh; Wendol Williams; Jim Ropchan; David Labaree; Alexander Neumeister; Yiyun Huang; Richard E Carson
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 6.200

View more
  11 in total

1.  Cardiac-gated parametric images from 82 Rb PET from dynamic frames and direct 4D reconstruction.

Authors:  Mary Germino; Richard E Carson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-12-30       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Quantitative accuracy in total-body imaging using the uEXPLORER PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  Edwin K Leung; Eric Berg; Negar Omidvari; Benjamin A Spencer; Elizabeth Li; Yasser G Abdelhafez; Jeffrey P Schmall; Weiping Liu; Liuchun He; Songsong Tang; Yilin Liu; Yun Dong; Terry Jones; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 4.174

3.  Latent-Profile Analysis Reveals Behavioral and Brain Correlates of Dopamine-Cognition Associations.

Authors:  Martin Lövdén; Nina Karalija; Micael Andersson; Anders Wåhlin; Jan Axelsson; Ylva Köhncke; Lars S Jonasson; Anna Rieckman; Goran Papenberg; Douglas D Garrett; Marc Guitart-Masip; Alireza Salami; Katrine Riklund; Lars Bäckman; Lars Nyberg; Ulman Lindenberger
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Performance evaluation of the Q.Clear reconstruction framework versus conventional reconstruction algorithms for quantitative brain PET-MR studies.

Authors:  Daniela Ribeiro; William Hallett; Adriana A S Tavares
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2021-05-07

5.  Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance hybrid scanner imaging of cerebral blood flow using (15)O-water positron emission tomography and arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging in newborn piglets.

Authors:  Julie B Andersen; William S Henning; Ulrich Lindberg; Claes N Ladefoged; Liselotte Højgaard; Gorm Greisen; Ian Law
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 6.200

6.  Mapping the landscape of human dopamine D2/3 receptors with [11C]raclopride.

Authors:  Goran Papenberg; Lars Jonasson; Nina Karalija; Jarkko Johansson; Ylva Köhncke; Alireza Salami; Micael Andersson; Jan Axelsson; Anders Wåhlin; Katrine Riklund; Ulman Lindenberger; Martin Lövdén; Lars Nyberg; Lars Bäckman
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.270

7.  Human adult and adolescent biodistribution and dosimetry of the synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A radioligand 11C-UCB-J.

Authors:  Jason Bini; Daniel Holden; Kathryn Fontaine; Tim Mulnix; Yihuan Lu; David Matuskey; Jim Ropchan; Nabeel Nabulsi; Yiyun Huang; Richard E Carson
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 3.138

8.  Bias evaluation and reduction in 3D OP-OSEM reconstruction in dynamic equilibrium PET studies with 11C-labeled for binding potential analysis.

Authors:  Cláudia Régio Brambilla; Jürgen Scheins; Ahlam Issa; Lutz Tellmann; Hans Herzog; Elena Rota Kops; N Jon Shah; Irene Neuner; Christoph W Lerche
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Measured PET Data Characterization with the Negative Binomial Distribution Model.

Authors:  Maria Filomena Santarelli; Vincenzo Positano; Luigi Landini
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 1.553

10.  Phantom-based image quality assessment of clinical 18F-FDG protocols in digital PET/CT and comparison to conventional PMT-based PET/CT.

Authors:  Silvano Gnesin; Christine Kieffer; Konstantinos Zeimpekis; Jean-Pierre Papazyan; Renaud Guignard; John O Prior; Francis R Verdun; Thiago V M Lima
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2020-01-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.