Literature DB >> 33481896

Bias evaluation and reduction in 3D OP-OSEM reconstruction in dynamic equilibrium PET studies with 11C-labeled for binding potential analysis.

Cláudia Régio Brambilla1,2, Jürgen Scheins1, Ahlam Issa1, Lutz Tellmann1, Hans Herzog1, Elena Rota Kops1, N Jon Shah1,3,4,5, Irene Neuner1,2,4, Christoph W Lerche1.   

Abstract

Iterative image reconstruction is widely used in positron emission tomography. However, it is known to contribute to quantitation bias and is particularly pronounced during dynamic studies with 11C-labeled radiotracers where count rates become low towards the end of the acquisition. As the strength of the quantitation bias depends on the counts in the reconstructed frame, it can differ from frame to frame of the acquisition. This is especially relevant in the case of neuro-receptor studies with simultaneous PET/MR when a bolus-infusion protocol is applied to allow the comparison of pre- and post-task effects. Here, count dependent changes in quantitation bias may interfere with task changes. We evaluated the impact of different framing schemes on quantitation bias and its propagation into binding potential (BP) using a phantom decay study with 11C and 3D OP-OSEM. Further, we propose a framing scheme that keeps the true counts per frame constant over the acquisition time as constant framing schemes and conventional increasing framing schemes are unlikely to achieve stable bias values during the acquisition time range. For a constant framing scheme with 5 minutes frames, the BP bias was 7.13±2.01% (10.8% to 3.8%) compared to 5.63±2.85% (7.8% to 4.0%) for conventional increasing framing schemes. Using the proposed constant true counts framing scheme, a stabilization of the BP bias was achieved at 2.56±3.92% (3.5% to 1.7%). The change in BP bias was further studied by evaluating the linear slope during the acquisition time interval. The lowest slope values were observed in the constant true counts framing scheme. The constant true counts framing scheme was effective for BP bias stabilization at relevant activity and time ranges. The mean BP bias under these conditions was 2.56±3.92%, which represents the lower limit for the detection of changes in BP during equilibrium and is especially important in the case of cognitive tasks where the expected changes are low.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33481896      PMCID: PMC7822533          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  31 in total

1.  OS-EM and FBP reconstructions at low count rates: effect on 3D PET studies of [11C] WAY-100635.

Authors:  Marie José Bélanger; J John Mann; Ramin V Parsey
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  In vivo ketamine-induced changes in [¹¹C]ABP688 binding to metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5.

Authors:  Christine DeLorenzo; Nicole DellaGioia; Michael Bloch; Gerard Sanacora; Nabeel Nabulsi; Chadi Abdallah; Jie Yang; Ruofeng Wen; J John Mann; John H Krystal; Ramin V Parsey; Richard E Carson; Irina Esterlis
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  Performance evaluation of the ECAT HRRT: an LSO-LYSO double layer high resolution, high sensitivity scanner.

Authors:  Hugo W A M de Jong; Floris H P van Velden; Reina W Kloet; Fred L Buijs; Ronald Boellaard; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  High resolution BrainPET combined with simultaneous MRI.

Authors:  H Herzog; K-J Langen; C Weirich; E Rota Kops; J Kaffanke; L Tellmann; J Scheins; I Neuner; G Stoffels; K Fischer; L Caldeira; H H Coenen; N J Shah
Journal:  Nuklearmedizin       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 1.379

5.  List-mode likelihood.

Authors:  H H Barrett; T White; L C Parra
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Appropriately regularized OSEM can improve the reconstructed PET images of data with low count statistics.

Authors:  Konstantinos Karaoglanis; Irene Polycarpou; Nikos Efthimiou; Charalampos Tsoumpas
Journal:  Hell J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 1.102

7.  Simulation-based evaluation of OSEM iterative reconstruction methods in dynamic brain PET studies.

Authors:  Anthonin Reilhac; Sandrine Tomeï; Irène Buvat; Christian Michel; Frank Keheren; Nicolas Costes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Ketamine-induced reduction in mGluR5 availability is associated with an antidepressant response: an [11C]ABP688 and PET imaging study in depression.

Authors:  I Esterlis; N DellaGioia; R H Pietrzak; D Matuskey; N Nabulsi; C G Abdallah; J Yang; C Pittenger; G Sanacora; J H Krystal; R V Parsey; R E Carson; C DeLorenzo
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 15.992

9.  Reconstructed spatial resolution and contrast recovery with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) for FDG-PET compared to time-of-flight (TOF) with point spread function (PSF).

Authors:  Julian M Rogasch; Said Suleiman; Frank Hofheinz; Stephanie Bluemel; Mathias Lukas; Holger Amthauer; Christian Furth
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2020-01-10

10.  Optimization of [18F]PSMA-1007 PET-CT using regularized reconstruction in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Elin Trägårdh; David Minarik; Gustav Brolin; Ulrika Bitzén; Berit Olsson; Jenny Oddstig
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2020-05-12
View more
  1 in total

1.  mGluR5 binding changes during a mismatch negativity task in a multimodal protocol with [11C]ABP688 PET/MR-EEG.

Authors:  Christoph W Lerche; Irene Neuner; Cláudia Régio Brambilla; Tanja Veselinović; Ravichandran Rajkumar; Jörg Mauler; Andreas Matusch; Andrej Ruch; Linda Orth; Shukti Ramkiran; Hasan Sbaihat; Nicolas Kaulen; Nibal Yahya Khudeish; Christine Wyss; Karsten Heekeren; Wolfram Kawohl; Elena Rota Kops; Lutz Tellmann; Jürgen Scheins; Frank Boers; Bernd Neumaier; Johannes Ermert; Markus Lang; Stefan Stüsgen; Hans Herzog; Karl-Josef Langen; N Jon Shah
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 6.222

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.