Literature DB >> 29205378

Cardiac-gated parametric images from 82 Rb PET from dynamic frames and direct 4D reconstruction.

Mary Germino1, Richard E Carson1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cardiac perfusion PET data can be reconstructed as a dynamic sequence and kinetic modeling performed to quantify myocardial blood flow, or reconstructed as static gated images to quantify function. Parametric images from dynamic PET are conventionally not gated, to allow use of all events with lower noise. An alternative method for dynamic PET is to incorporate the kinetic model into the reconstruction algorithm itself, bypassing the generation of a time series of emission images and directly producing parametric images. So-called "direct reconstruction" can produce parametric images with lower noise than the conventional method because the noise distribution is more easily modeled in projection space than in image space. In this work, we develop direct reconstruction of cardiac-gated parametric images for 82 Rb PET with an extension of the Parametric Motion compensation OSEM List mode Algorithm for Resolution-recovery reconstruction for the one tissue model (PMOLAR-1T).
METHODS: PMOLAR-1T was extended to accommodate model terms to account for spillover from the left and right ventricles into the myocardium. The algorithm was evaluated on a 4D simulated 82 Rb dataset, including a perfusion defect, as well as a human 82 Rb list mode acquisition. The simulated list mode was subsampled into replicates, each with counts comparable to one gate of a gated acquisition. Parametric images were produced by the indirect (separate reconstructions and modeling) and direct methods for each of eight low-count and eight normal-count replicates of the simulated data, and each of eight cardiac gates for the human data. For the direct method, two initialization schemes were tested: uniform initialization, and initialization with the filtered iteration 1 result of the indirect method. For the human dataset, event-by-event respiratory motion compensation was included. The indirect and direct methods were compared for the simulated dataset in terms of bias and coefficient of variation as a function of iteration.
RESULTS: Convergence of direct reconstruction was slow with uniform initialization; lower bias was achieved in fewer iterations by initializing with the filtered indirect iteration 1 images. For most parameters and regions evaluated, the direct method achieved the same or lower absolute bias at matched iteration as the indirect method, with 23%-65% lower noise. Additionally, the direct method gave better contrast between the perfusion defect and surrounding normal tissue than the indirect method. Gated parametric images from the human dataset had comparable relative performance of indirect and direct, in terms of mean parameter values per iteration. Changes in myocardial wall thickness and blood pool size across gates were readily visible in the gated parametric images, with higher contrast between myocardium and left ventricle blood pool in parametric images than gated SUV images.
CONCLUSIONS: Direct reconstruction can produce parametric images with less noise than the indirect method, opening the potential utility of gated parametric imaging for perfusion PET.
© 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac PET; direct PET reconstruction; kinetic modeling; parametric imaging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29205378      PMCID: PMC5807225          DOI: 10.1002/mp.12710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  31 in total

1.  A novel approach for direct reconstruction of parametric images for myocardial blood flow from PET imaging.

Authors:  Kuan-Hao Su; Tzu-Chen Yen; Yu-Hua Dean Fang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Four-dimensional (4D) image reconstruction strategies in dynamic PET: beyond conventional independent frame reconstruction.

Authors:  Arman Rahmim; Jing Tang; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Measurement of left ventricular volumes and function with O-15-labeled carbon monoxide gated positron emission tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Hadassa A Hofman; Paul Knaapen; Ronald Boellaard; Olga Bondarenko; Marco J W Götte; Willem G van Dockum; Cees A Visser; Albert C van Rossum; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Frans C Visser
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Myocardial perfusion with rubidium-82. I. Measurement of extraction fraction and flow with external detectors.

Authors:  N A Mullani; R A Goldstein; K L Gould; S K Marani; D J Fisher; H A O'Brien; M D Loberg
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Consequences of using a simplified kinetic model for dynamic PET data.

Authors:  P G Coxson; R H Huesman; L Borland
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Value of vasodilator left ventricular ejection fraction reserve in evaluating the magnitude of myocardium at risk and the extent of angiographic coronary artery disease: a 82Rb PET/CT study.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Divya Vangala; Uchechukwu Sampson; Atul Limaye; Raymond Kwong; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Incremental prognostic value of gated Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical variables and rest LVEF.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Rory Hachamovitch; Zelmira Curillova; Deepak Thomas; Divya Vangala; Raymond Y Kwong; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-07

8.  Independent and incremental prognostic value of left ventricular ejection fraction determined by stress gated rubidium 82 PET imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Kirkeith Lertsburapa; Alan W Ahlberg; Timothy M Bateman; Deborah Katten; Lyndy Volker; S James Cullom; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging.

Authors:  Mireille Lortie; Rob S B Beanlands; Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Ran Klein; Jean N Dasilva; Robert A DeKemp
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-07-07       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  The role of PET quantification in cardiovascular imaging.

Authors:  Piotr Slomka; Daniel S Berman; Erick Alexanderson; Guido Germano
Journal:  Clin Transl Imaging       Date:  2014-08-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Dynamic cardiac PET imaging: Technological improvements advancing future cardiac health.

Authors:  Grant T Gullberg; Uttam M Shrestha; Youngho Seo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Direct List Mode Parametric Reconstruction for Dynamic Cardiac SPECT.

Authors:  Luyao Shi; Yihuan Lu; Jing Wu; Jean-Dominique Gallezot; Nabil Boutagy; Stephanie Thorn; Albert J Sinusas; Richard E Carson; Chi Liu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 10.048

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.