Literature DB >> 25416625

Presynaptic and postsynaptic effects of local cathodal DC polarization within the spinal cord in anaesthetized animal preparations.

F Bolzoni1, E Jankowska.   

Abstract

KEY POINTS: Trans-spinal DC stimulation affects both postsynaptic neurons and the presynaptic axons providing input to these neurons. In the present study, we show that intraspinally applied cathodal current replicates the effects of trans-spinal direct current stimulation in deeply anaesthetized animals and affects spinal neurons both during the actual current application and during a post-polarization period. Presynaptic effects of local cathodal polarization were expressed in an increase in the excitability of skin afferents (in the dorsal horn) and group Ia afferents (in motor nuclei), both during and at least 30 min after DC application. However, although the postsynaptic facilitation (i.e. more effective) activation of motoneurons by stimuli applied in a motor nucleus was very potent during local DC application, it was only negligible once DC was discontinued. The results suggest that the prolonged effects of cathodal polarization are primarily associated with changes in synaptic transmission. ABSTRACT: The present study aimed to compare presynaptic and postsynaptic actions of direct current polarization in the spinal cord, focusing on DC effects on primary afferents and motoneurons. To reduce the directly affected spinal cord region, a weak polarizing direct current (0.1-0.3 μA) was applied locally in deeply anaesthetized cats and rats; within the hindlimb motor nuclei in the caudal lumbar segments, or in the dorsal horn within the terminal projection area of low threshold skin afferents. Changes in the excitability of primary afferents activated by intraspinal stimuli (20-50 μA) were estimated using increases or decreases in compound action potentials recorded from the dorsal roots or peripheral nerves as their measure. Changes in the postsynaptic actions of the afferents were assessed from intracellularly recorded monosynaptic EPSPs in hindlimb motoneurons and monosynaptic extracellular field potentials (evoked by group Ia afferents in motor nuclei, or by low threshold cutaneous afferents in the dorsal horn). The excitability of motoneurons activated by intraspinal stimuli was assessed using intracellular records or motoneuronal discharges recorded from a ventral root or a muscle nerve. Cathodal polarization was found to affect motoneurons and afferents providing input to them to a different extent. The excitability of both was markedly increased during DC application, although post-polarization facilitation was found to involve presynaptic afferents and some of their postsynaptic actions, but only negligibly motoneurons themselves. Taken together, these results indicate that long-lasting post-polarization facilitation of spinal activity induced by locally applied cathodal current primarily reflects the facilitation of synaptic transmission.
© 2014 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2014 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25416625      PMCID: PMC4398531          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.285940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  60 in total

1.  Effects of monoamines on interneurons in four spinal reflex pathways from group I and/or group II muscle afferents.

Authors:  E Jankowska; I Hammar; B Chojnicka; C H Hedén
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Reduction of transmitter output by depolarization.

Authors:  J I HUBBARD; W D WILLIS
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1962-03-31       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Mobilization of transmitter by hyperpolarization.

Authors:  J I HUBBARD; W D WILLIS
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1962-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES - tDCS; tRNS, tACS) methods.

Authors:  Walter Paulus
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 2.868

5.  Direct and indirect activation of nerve cells by electrical pulses applied extracellularly.

Authors:  B Gustafsson; E Jankowska
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Changes of extracellular potassium concentration induced by neuronal activity in the sinal cord of the cat.

Authors:  N Kríz; E Syková; E Ujec; L Vyklický
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Analysis of threshold currents during microstimulation of fibres in the spinal cord.

Authors:  W J Roberts; D O Smith
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1973-11

8.  Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects.

Authors:  Asif Rahman; Davide Reato; Mattia Arlotti; Fernando Gasca; Abhishek Datta; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Subcortical effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in the rat.

Authors:  F Bolzoni; M Bączyk; E Jankowska
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Modulatory effects of alpha1-,alpha2-, and beta -receptor agonists on feline spinal interneurons with monosynaptic input from group I muscle afferents.

Authors:  Ingela Hammar; Elzbieta Jankowska
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  18 in total

1.  Repeated cathodal transspinal pulse and direct current stimulation modulate cortical and corticospinal excitability differently in healthy humans.

Authors:  Lynda M Murray; Maria Knikou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Spinal control of motor outputs by intrinsic and externally induced electric field potentials.

Authors:  Elzbieta Jankowska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Long-lasting increase in axonal excitability after epidurally applied DC.

Authors:  Elzbieta Jankowska; Dominik Kaczmarek; Francesco Bolzoni; Ingela Hammar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Spinal cord direct current stimulation differentially modulates neuronal activity in the dorsal and ventral spinal cord.

Authors:  Weiguo Song; John H Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Does trans-spinal direct current stimulation modulate the Hoffmann reflexes of healthy individuals? A systematic review and meta-analysisc.

Authors:  Plínio Luna Albuquerque; Thyciane Mendonça; Mayara Campêlo; Lívia Shirahige; Kátia Monte-Silva
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  Motor cortex and spinal cord neuromodulation promote corticospinal tract axonal outgrowth and motor recovery after cervical contusion spinal cord injury.

Authors:  N Zareen; M Shinozaki; D Ryan; H Alexander; A Amer; D Q Truong; N Khadka; A Sarkar; S Naeem; M Bikson; J H Martin
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 5.330

7.  Does trans-spinal and local DC polarization affect presynaptic inhibition and post-activation depression?

Authors:  D Kaczmarek; J Ristikankare; E Jankowska
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Branching points of primary afferent fibers are vital for the modulation of fiber excitability by epidural DC polarization and by GABA in the rat spinal cord.

Authors:  Yaqing Li; Krishnapriya Hari; Ana M Lucas-Osma; Keith K Fenrich; David J Bennett; Ingela Hammar; Elzbieta Jankowska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Repeated anodal trans-spinal direct current stimulation results in long-term reduction of spasticity in mice with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Wagdy Mekhael; Sultana Begum; Sreyashi Samaddar; Mazen Hassan; Pedro Toruno; Malik Ahmed; Alexis Gorin; Michael Maisano; Mark Ayad; Zaghloul Ahmed
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Combined motor cortex and spinal cord neuromodulation promotes corticospinal system functional and structural plasticity and motor function after injury.

Authors:  Weiguo Song; Alzahraa Amer; Daniel Ryan; John H Martin
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 5.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.