Literature DB >> 28515284

Long-lasting increase in axonal excitability after epidurally applied DC.

Elzbieta Jankowska1, Dominik Kaczmarek2,3, Francesco Bolzoni2,4, Ingela Hammar2.   

Abstract

Effects of direct current (DC) on nerve fibers have primarily been investigated during or just after DC application. However, locally applied cathodal DC was recently demonstrated to increase the excitability of intraspinal preterminal axonal branches for >1 h. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate whether DC evokes a similarly long-lasting increase in the excitability of myelinated axons within the dorsal columns. The excitability of dorsal column fibers stimulated epidurally was monitored by recording compound action potentials in peripheral nerves in acute experiments in deeply anesthetized rats. The results show that 1) cathodal polarization (0.8-1.0 µA) results in a severalfold increase in the number of epidurally activated fibers and 2) the increase in the excitability appears within seconds, 3) lasts for >1 h, and 4) is activity independent, as it does not require fiber stimulation during the polarization. These features demonstrate an unexplored form of plasticity of myelinated fibers and indicate the conditions under which it develops. They also suggest that therapeutic effects of epidural stimulation may be significantly enhanced if it is combined with DC polarization. In particular, by using DC to increase the number of fibers activated by low-intensity epidural stimuli, the low clinical tolerance to higher stimulus intensities might be overcome. The activity independence of long-lasting DC effects would also allow the use of only brief periods of DC polarization preceding epidural stimulation to increase the effect.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The study indicates a new form of plasticity of myelinated fibers. The differences in time course of DC-evoked increases in the excitability of myelinated nerve fibers in the dorsal columns and in preterminal axonal branches suggest that distinct mechanisms are involved in them. The results show that combining epidural stimulation and transspinal DC polarization may dramatically improve their outcome and result in more effective pain control and the return of impaired motor functions.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  direct current polarization; epidural stimulation; nerve fibers; spinal cord excitability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28515284      PMCID: PMC5547254          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00148.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  46 in total

Review 1.  Nerve excitability testing and its clinical application to neuromuscular diseases.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Nodera; Ryuji Kaji
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Long-lasting changes in the level of the electrical activity of the cerebral cortex produced bypolarizing currents.

Authors:  L J BINDMAN; O C LIPPOLD; J W REDFEARN
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1962-11-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  The use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to relieve pain.

Authors:  Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur; Andrea Antal; Rechdi Ahdab; Daniel Ciampi de Andrade; Felipe Fregni; Eman M Khedr; Michael Nitsche; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 4.  Synapse-type-specific plasticity in local circuits.

Authors:  Rylan S Larsen; P Jesper Sjöström
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  After-effects of near-threshold stimulation in single human motor axons.

Authors:  Hugh Bostock; Cindy Shin-Yi Lin; James Howells; Louise Trevillion; Stacey Jankelowitz; David Burke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Presynaptic and postsynaptic effects of local cathodal DC polarization within the spinal cord in anaesthetized animal preparations.

Authors:  F Bolzoni; E Jankowska
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learning.

Authors:  Brita Fritsch; Janine Reis; Keri Martinowich; Heidi M Schambra; Yuanyuan Ji; Leonardo G Cohen; Bai Lu
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Induction of late LTP-like plasticity in the human motor cortex by repeated non-invasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Katia Monte-Silva; Min-Fang Kuo; Silvia Hessenthaler; Shane Fresnoza; David Liebetanz; Walter Paulus; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 9.  The pharmacology of neuroplasticity induced by non-invasive brain stimulation: building models for the clinical use of CNS active drugs.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Florian Müller-Dahlhaus; Walter Paulus; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Which Neuronal Elements are Activated Directly by Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Authors:  Jan Holsheimer
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2002-01
View more
  9 in total

1.  Repeated cathodal transspinal pulse and direct current stimulation modulate cortical and corticospinal excitability differently in healthy humans.

Authors:  Lynda M Murray; Maria Knikou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Spinal control of motor outputs by intrinsic and externally induced electric field potentials.

Authors:  Elzbieta Jankowska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Branching points of primary afferent fibers are vital for the modulation of fiber excitability by epidural DC polarization and by GABA in the rat spinal cord.

Authors:  Yaqing Li; Krishnapriya Hari; Ana M Lucas-Osma; Keith K Fenrich; David J Bennett; Ingela Hammar; Elzbieta Jankowska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The effect of cathodal transspinal direct current stimulation on tibialis anterior stretch reflex components in humans.

Authors:  Eva Rudjord Therkildsen; Jens Bo Nielsen; Mikkel Malling Beck; Tomofumi Yamaguchi; Jakob Lorentzen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Trans-Spinal Direct Current Stimulation Targets Ca2+ Channels to Induce Persistent Motor Unit Responses.

Authors:  Weiguo Song; John H Martin
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Non-Invasive Transcutaneous Spinal DC Stimulation as a Neurorehabilitation ALS Therapy in Awake G93A Mice: The First Step to Clinical Translation.

Authors:  Morgan M Highlander; Sherif M Elbasiouny
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-05

7.  Transspinal Direct Current Stimulation Produces Persistent Plasticity in Human Motor Pathways.

Authors:  Lynda M Murray; Behdad Tahayori; Maria Knikou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation increases corticospinal transmission and enhances voluntary motor output in humans.

Authors:  Tomofumi Yamaguchi; Mikkel M Beck; Eva R Therkildsen; Christian Svane; Christian Forman; Jakob Lorentzen; Bernard A Conway; Jesper Lundbye-Jensen; Svend S Geertsen; Jens B Nielsen
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2020-08

9.  Modulation of H-reflex responses and frequency-dependent depression by repetitive spinal electromagnetic stimulation: From rats to humans and back to chronic spinal cord injured rats.

Authors:  Hayk Petrosyan; Li Liang; Asrat Tesfa; Sue A Sisto; Magda Fahmy; Victor L Arvanian
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-12       Impact factor: 3.698

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.