Literature DB >> 31079235

Repeated cathodal transspinal pulse and direct current stimulation modulate cortical and corticospinal excitability differently in healthy humans.

Lynda M Murray1, Maria Knikou2,3.   

Abstract

Noninvasive transspinal stimulation of the thoracolumbar region, where leg motor circuits reside, produces prominent plasticity of brain and spinal cord circuits. However, reorganization of cortical and corticospinal excitability after multiple sessions (i.e. repeated) remains elusive. In this study, we investigated changes in intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation, and corticospinal excitability after 10 sessions of cathodal transcutaneous delivery of pulse or direct current stimulation, termed here transspinal (tsPCS, tsDCS), in resting healthy humans. tsPCS was delivered at sub- and supra-threshold intensities, while intensity for tsDCS ranged from 2.24 to 2.34 mA within a session. Intracortical inhibition and facilitation were assessed based on the tibialis anterior (TA) motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude following subthreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at the conditioning-test (C-T) intervals of 1, 2, 3, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 ms. The TA MEP recruitment input-output curves were also assembled to establish changes in corticospinal excitability. For both transspinal stimulation protocols, the active cathodal electrode was placed over the T10 spinal process. Results indicated that repeated tsPCS did not alter intracortical inhibition or intracortical facilitation but decreased corticospinal excitability for the right M1 and increased corticospinal excitability for the left M1. tsDCS decreased intracortical inhibition, increased intracortical facilitation, did not affect the maximal MEP amplitude but increased the slope of the right TA MEP input-output curve. Neurophysiological changes may be attributed to neural mechanisms involved in learning and memory. These results support that noninvasive transspinal stimulation alters both cortical and corticospinal neural excitability in resting healthy humans.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cortical mechanisms; Corticospinal excitability; Direct current; Modulation; Plasticity; Pulse current; Transspinal stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31079235     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05559-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  59 in total

Review 1.  The concept of long term potentiation of transmission at synapses.

Authors:  M R Bennett
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 11.685

2.  Mechanisms of intracortical I-wave facilitation elicited with paired-pulse magnetic stimulation in humans.

Authors:  Ritsuko Hanajima; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Yasuo Terao; Hiroyuki Enomoto; Yasushi Shiio; Hitoshi Mochizuki; Toshiaki Furubayashi; Haruo Uesugi; Nobue Kobayashi Iwata; Ichiro Kanazawa
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Short-interval paired-pulse inhibition and facilitation of human motor cortex: the dimension of stimulus intensity.

Authors:  Tihomir V Ilić; Frank Meintzschel; Ulrich Cleff; Diane Ruge; Kirn R Kessler; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  NT-3 evokes an LTP-like facilitation of AMPA/kainate receptor-mediated synaptic transmission in the neonatal rat spinal cord.

Authors:  V L Arvanov; B S Seebach; L M Mendell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  THE ACTION OF BRIEF POLARIZING CURRENTS ON THE CEREBRAL CORTEX OF THE RAT (1) DURING CURRENT FLOW AND (2) IN THE PRODUCTION OF LONG-LASTING AFTER-EFFECTS.

Authors:  L J BINDMAN; O C LIPPOLD; J W REDFEARN
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1964-08       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Long-lasting changes in the level of the electrical activity of the cerebral cortex produced bypolarizing currents.

Authors:  L J BINDMAN; O C LIPPOLD; J W REDFEARN
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1962-11-10       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The effect of electric polarization of the spinal cord on central afferent fibres and on their excitatory synaptic action.

Authors:  J C ECCLES; P G KOSTYUK; R F SCHMIDT
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Effects of uniform extracellular DC electric fields on excitability in rat hippocampal slices in vitro.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Masashi Inoue; Hiroki Akiyama; Jackie K Deans; John E Fox; Hiroyoshi Miyakawa; John G R Jefferys
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-02-20       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Removal of NMDA receptor Mg(2+) block extends the action of NT-3 on synaptic transmission in neonatal rat motoneurons.

Authors:  V L Arvanian; L M Mendell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Viral delivery of NR2D subunits reduces Mg2+ block of NMDA receptor and restores NT-3-induced potentiation of AMPA-kainate responses in maturing rat motoneurons.

Authors:  Victor L Arvanian; William J Bowers; Jeffrey C Petruska; Vladimir Motin; Honeyleen Manuzon; Wade C Narrow; Howard J Federoff; Lorne M Mendell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  6 in total

1.  Brain and spinal cord paired stimulation coupled with locomotor training affects polysynaptic flexion reflex circuits in human spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Timothy S Pulverenti; Morad Zaaya; Maria Knikou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation shows no effect on paired stimulation suppression of the somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Jan H Bettmann; Christine H Meyer-Frießem; Lauren M Schweizer; Lara Schlaffke; Peter K Zahn; Martin Tegenthoff; Oliver Höffken
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Posteroanterior Cervical Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation: Interactions with Cortical and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Jaclyn R Wecht; William M Savage; Grace O Famodimu; Gregory A Mendez; Jonah M Levine; Matthew T Maher; Joseph P Weir; Jill M Wecht; Jason B Carmel; Yu-Kuang Wu; Noam Y Harel
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  The past, present, and future of traumatic spinal cord injury therapies: a review.

Authors:  Stuart Stokes; Martin Drozda; Christopher Lee
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-05

Review 5.  Trans-Spinal Electrical Stimulation Therapy for Functional Rehabilitation after Spinal Cord Injury: Review.

Authors:  Md Akhlasur Rahman; Niraj Singh Tharu; Sylvia M Gustin; Yong-Ping Zheng; Monzurul Alam
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Neurophysiological Changes After Paired Brain and Spinal Cord Stimulation Coupled With Locomotor Training in Human Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Timothy S Pulverenti; Morad Zaaya; Monika Grabowski; Ewelina Grabowski; Md Anamul Islam; Jeffrey Li; Lynda M Murray; Maria Knikou
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.003

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.