Literature DB >> 25320345

Fructose- and glucose-conditioned preferences in FVB mice: strain differences in post-oral sugar appetition.

Anthony Sclafani1, Steven Zukerman2, Karen Ackroff2.   

Abstract

Recent studies indicate that, unlike glucose, fructose has little or no post-oral preference conditioning actions in C57BL/6J (B6) mice. The present study determined whether this is also the case for FVB mice, which overconsume fructose relative to B6 mice. In experiment 1, FVB mice strongly preferred a noncaloric 0.1% sucralose + 0.1% saccharin (S+S) solution to 8% fructose in a 2-day choice test but switched their preference to fructose after separate experience with the two sweeteners. Other FVB mice displayed a stronger preference for 8% glucose over S+S. In a second experiment, ad libitum-fed FVB mice trained 24 h/day acquired a significant preference for a flavor (CS+) paired with intragastric (IG) self-infusions of 16% fructose over a different flavor (CS-) paired with IG water infusions. IG fructose infusions also conditioned flavor preferences in food-restricted FVB mice trained 1 h/day. IG infusions of 16% glucose conditioned stronger preferences in FVB mice trained 24- or 1 h/day. Thus, fructose has post-oral flavor conditioning effects in FVB mice, but these effects are less pronounced than those produced by glucose. Further studies of the differential post-oral conditioning effects of fructose and glucose in B6 and FVB mice should enhance our understanding of the physiological processes involved in sugar reward.
Copyright © 2014 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C57BL/6J mice; post-oral flavor conditioning; saccharin; sucralose

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25320345      PMCID: PMC4269666          DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00312.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  42 in total

Review 1.  Gut-brain nutrient signaling. Appetition vs. satiation.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  Diverse roles for the Drosophila fructose sensor Gr43a.

Authors:  Tetsuya Miyamoto; Hubert Amrein
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.160

3.  Impact of T1r3 and Trpm5 on carbohydrate preference and acceptance in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Steven Zukerman; John I Glendinning; Robert F Margolskee; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Sugar and fat conditioned flavor preferences in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: oral and postoral interactions.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; John I Glendinning
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Post-oral appetite stimulation by sugars and nonmetabolizable sugar analogs.

Authors:  Steven Zukerman; Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  Polymorphisms in the taste receptor gene (Tas1r3) region are associated with saccharin preference in 30 mouse strains.

Authors:  D R Reed; S Li; X Li; L Huang; M G Tordoff; R Starling-Roney; K Taniguchi; D B West; J D Ohmen; G K Beauchamp; A A Bachmanov
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Sensory-specific appetition: Postingestive detection of glucose rapidly promotes continued consumption of a recently encountered flavor.

Authors:  Kevin P Myers; Marisa S Taddeo; Emily K Richards
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2013-04-03

Review 8.  Nutrient sensors.

Authors:  Tetsuya Miyamoto; Geraldine Wright; Hubert Amrein
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Metabolic regulation of brain response to food cues.

Authors:  Ivan E de Araujo; Tammy Lin; Maria G Veldhuizen; Dana M Small
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Hepatic portal glucose infusions decrease food intake and increase food preference.

Authors:  M G Tordoff; M I Friedman
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1986-07
View more
  14 in total

1.  Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-02-10

2.  CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J Mice Differ in Their Oral and Postoral Attraction to Glucose and Fructose.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Austin S Vural; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 3.  From appetite setpoint to appetition: 50years of ingestive behavior research.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-01-02

Review 4.  Does nutrient sensing determine how we "see" food?

Authors:  Sophie C Hamr; Beini Wang; Timothy D Swartz; Frank A Duca
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.810

5.  Operant licking for intragastric sugar infusions: Differential reinforcing actions of glucose, sucrose and fructose in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-10-17

6.  BALB/c and SWR inbred mice differ in post-oral fructose appetition as revealed by sugar versus non-nutritive sweetener tests.

Authors:  Tamar T Kraft; Donald Huang; Melanie Lolier; Deena Warshaw; Sam LaMagna; Elona Natanova; Anthony Sclafani; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-10-17

7.  Flavor preference conditioning by different sugars in sweet ageusic Trpm5 knockout mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-12

8.  Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-08-12

9.  MCH receptor deletion does not impair glucose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Antoine Adamantidis; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-05-16

10.  Dopamine D1 and opioid receptor antagonists differentially reduce the acquisition and expression of fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in BALB/c and SWR mice.

Authors:  Tamar T Kraft; Yakov Yakubov; Donald Huang; Gregory Fitzgerald; Elona Natanova; Anthony Sclafani; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.