Literature DB >> 26220464

Dopamine D1 and opioid receptor antagonists differentially reduce the acquisition and expression of fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in BALB/c and SWR mice.

Tamar T Kraft1, Yakov Yakubov2, Donald Huang2, Gregory Fitzgerald2, Elona Natanova2, Anthony Sclafani3, Richard J Bodnar4.   

Abstract

Sugar appetite is influenced by unlearned and learned preferences in rodents. The present study examined whether dopamine (DA) D1 (SCH23390: SCH) and opioid (naltrexone: NTX) receptor antagonists differentially altered the expression and acquisition of fructose-conditioned flavor preferences (CFPs) in BALB/c and SWR mice. In expression experiments, food-restricted mice alternately (10 sessions, 1h) consumed a flavored (e.g., cherry) 8% fructose+0.2% saccharin solution (CS+) and a differently-flavored (e.g., grape) 0.2% saccharin solution (CS-). Two-bottle CS choice tests (1h) occurred 0.5h following vehicle: SCH (200 or 800 nmol/kg) or NTX (1 or 5mg/kg). SCH, but not NTX significantly reduced CS+ preference in both strains. In acquisition experiments, 0.5h prior to 10 acquisition training sessions, vehicle, SCH (50 nmol/kg), NTX (1 mg/kg) or Limited Control vehicle treatments were administered, followed by two-bottle CS choice tests without injections. SCH and NTX reduced training intakes in both strains. BALB/c mice displayed hastened extinction of the fructose-CFP following training with SCH, but not NTX. SCH eliminated fructose-CFP acquisition in SWR mice, whereas NTX hastened extinction of the CFP. These results are compared to previous drug findings obtained with sucrose-CFPs in SWR and BALB/c mice, and are discussed in terms of differential effects of these sugars on oral and post-oral conditioning.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetic variance; Naltrexone; Orosensory (flavor–flavor) learning; SCH23390

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26220464      PMCID: PMC4648251          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.07.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  30 in total

1.  Effects of dopamine receptor antagonists on sucrose consumption and preference.

Authors:  R Muscat; P Willner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Pharmacology of flavor preference conditioning in sham-feeding rats: effects of naltrexone.

Authors:  W Z Yu; A Sclafani; A R Delamater; R J Bodnar
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.533

3.  Pimozide decreases the positive reinforcing effect of sham fed sucrose in the rat.

Authors:  N Geary; G P Smith
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.533

4.  Flavor enhances the antidipsogenic effect of naloxone.

Authors:  A S Levine; S S Murray; J Kneip; M Grace; J E Morley
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1982-01

5.  Naloxone modifies sugar-water intake in rats drinking with open gastric fistulas.

Authors:  G A Rockwood; L D Reid
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1982-12

6.  Intragastric glucose but not fructose conditions robust flavor preferences in rats.

Authors:  A Sclafani; C Cardieri; K Tucker; D Blusk; K Ackroff
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1993-08

7.  Naloxone blocks that portion of feeding driven by sweet taste in food-restricted rats.

Authors:  A S Levine; D T Weldon; M Grace; J P Cleary; C J Billington
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1995-01

8.  Naloxone attenuation of sham feeding is modified by manipulation of sucrose concentration.

Authors:  T C Kirkham; S J Cooper
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1988

9.  Naltrexone does not prevent acquisition or expression of flavor preferences conditioned by fructose in rats.

Authors:  Robert W Baker; Yin Li; Mariel G Lee; Anthony Sclafani; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  D-2 selective receptor antagonists suppress sucrose sham feeding in the rat.

Authors:  L H Schneider; J Gibbs; G P Smith
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.077

View more
  2 in total

1.  Ghrelin signaling is not essential for sugar or fat conditioned flavor preferences in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Khalid Touzani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-05-21

2.  BALB/c and SWR inbred mice differ in post-oral fructose appetition as revealed by sugar versus non-nutritive sweetener tests.

Authors:  Tamar T Kraft; Donald Huang; Melanie Lolier; Deena Warshaw; Sam LaMagna; Elona Natanova; Anthony Sclafani; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-10-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.