Literature DB >> 14749438

Polymorphisms in the taste receptor gene (Tas1r3) region are associated with saccharin preference in 30 mouse strains.

D R Reed1, S Li, X Li, L Huang, M G Tordoff, R Starling-Roney, K Taniguchi, D B West, J D Ohmen, G K Beauchamp, A A Bachmanov.   

Abstract

The results of recent studies suggest that the mouse Sac (saccharin preference) locus is identical to the Tas1r3 (taste receptor) gene. The goal of this study was to identify Tas1r3 sequence variants associated with saccharin preference in a large number of inbred mouse strains. Initially, we sequenced approximately 6.7 kb of the Tas1r3 gene and its flanking regions from six inbred mouse strains with high and low saccharin preference, including the strains in which the Sac alleles were described originally (C57BL/6J, Sac(b); DBA/2J, Sac(d)). Of the 89 sequence variants detected among these six strains, eight polymorphic sites were significantly associated with preferences for 1.6 mm saccharin. Next, each of these eight variant sites were genotyped in 24 additional mouse strains. Analysis of the genotype-phenotype associations in all 30 strains showed the strongest association with saccharin preference at three sites: nucleotide (nt) -791 (3 bp insertion/deletion), nt +135 (Ser45Ser), and nt +179 (Ile60Thr). We measured Tas1r3 gene expression, transcript size, and T1R3 immunoreactivity in the taste tissue of two inbred mouse strains with different Tas1r3 haplotypes and saccharin preferences. The results of these experiments suggest that the polymorphisms associated with saccharin preference do not act by blocking gene expression, changing alternative splicing, or interfering with protein translation in taste tissue. The amino acid substitution (Ile60Thr) may influence the ability of the protein to form dimers or bind sweeteners. Here, we present data for future studies directed to experimentally confirm the function of these polymorphisms and highlight some of the difficulties of identifying specific DNA sequence variants that underlie quantitative trait loci.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14749438      PMCID: PMC1397915          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1374-03.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  43 in total

1.  PipMaker--a web server for aligning two genomic DNA sequences.

Authors:  S Schwartz; Z Zhang; K A Frazer; A Smit; C Riemer; J Bouck; R Gibbs; R Hardison; W Miller
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  A recombination hotspot delimits a wild-species quantitative trait locus for tomato sugar content to 484 bp within an invertase gene.

Authors:  E Fridman; T Pleban; D Zamir
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Tas1r3, encoding a new candidate taste receptor, is allelic to the sweet responsiveness locus Sac.

Authors:  M Max; Y G Shanker; L Huang; M Rong; Z Liu; F Campagne; H Weinstein; S Damak; R F Margolskee
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Molecular genetic identification of a candidate receptor gene for sweet taste.

Authors:  M Kitagawa; Y Kusakabe; H Miura; Y Ninomiya; A Hino
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2001-04-27       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  A candidate taste receptor gene near a sweet taste locus.

Authors:  J P Montmayeur; S D Liberles; H Matsunami; L B Buck
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Genealogies of mouse inbred strains.

Authors:  J A Beck; S Lloyd; M Hafezparast; M Lennon-Pierce; J T Eppig; M F Festing; E M Fisher
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 7.  Genetic variations and polymorphisms of G protein-coupled receptors: functional and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  B K Rana; T Shiina; P A Insel
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 13.820

8.  Complex promoter and coding region beta 2-adrenergic receptor haplotypes alter receptor expression and predict in vivo responsiveness.

Authors:  C M Drysdale; D W McGraw; C B Stack; J C Stephens; R S Judson; K Nandabalan; K Arnold; G Ruano; S B Liggett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Identification of a novel member of the T1R family of putative taste receptors.

Authors:  E Sainz; J N Korley; J F Battey; S L Sullivan
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.372

10.  High-resolution genetic mapping of the saccharin preference locus (Sac) and the putative sweet taste receptor (T1R1) gene (Gpr70) to mouse distal Chromosome 4.

Authors:  X Li; M Inoue; D R Reed; T Huque; R B Puchalski; M G Tordoff; Y Ninomiya; G K Beauchamp; A A Bachmanov
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.957

View more
  77 in total

1.  Genetic variation in odorant receptors contributes to variation in olfactory behavior in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  P K Richgels; S M Rollmann
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Odorant receptor polymorphisms and natural variation in olfactory behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Stephanie M Rollmann; Ping Wang; Priya Date; Steven A West; Trudy F C Mackay; Robert R H Anholt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Perceptual and neural responses to sweet taste in humans and rodents.

Authors:  Christian H Lemon
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.833

Review 4.  Genetics of taste and smell: poisons and pleasures.

Authors:  Danielle Renee Reed; Antti Knaapila
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.622

5.  Genetic approach to characterize interaction of sweeteners with sweet taste receptors in vivo.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 6.  Cats lack a sweet taste receptor.

Authors:  Xia Li; Weihua Li; Hong Wang; Douglas L Bayley; Jie Cao; Danielle R Reed; Alexander A Bachmanov; Liquan Huang; Véronique Legrand-Defretin; Gary K Beauchamp; Joseph G Brand
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Taste-evoked responses to sweeteners in the nucleus of the solitary tract differ between C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Stuart A McCaughey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Amino acid and carbohydrate preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-08-08

9.  No relationship between sequence variation in protein coding regions of the Tas1r3 gene and saccharin preference in rats.

Authors:  Ke Lu; Amanda H McDaniel; Michael G Tordoff; Xia Li; Gary K Beauchamp; Alexander A Bachmanov; Dennis A VanderWeele; Clinton D Chapman; Nancy K Dess; Liquan Huang; Hong Wang; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 3.160

10.  Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.