Literature DB >> 23926132

Post-oral appetite stimulation by sugars and nonmetabolizable sugar analogs.

Steven Zukerman1, Karen Ackroff, Anthony Sclafani.   

Abstract

Post-oral sugar actions enhance the intake of and preference for sugar-rich foods, a process referred to as appetition. Here, we investigated the role of intestinal sodium glucose cotransporters (SGLTs) in sugar appetition in C57BL/6J mice using sugars and nonmetabolizable sugar analogs that differ in their affinity for SGLT1 and SGLT3. In experiments 1 and 2, food-restricted mice were trained (1 h/day) to consume a flavored saccharin solution [conditioned stimulus (CS-)] paired with intragastric (IG) self-infusions of water and a different flavored solution (CS+) paired with infusions of 8 or 12% sugars (glucose, fructose, and galactose) or sugar analogs (α-methyl-D-glucopyranoside, MDG; 3-O-methyl-D-glucopyranoside, OMG). Subsequent two-bottle CS+ vs. CS- choice tests were conducted without coinfusions. Infusions of the SGLT1 ligands glucose, galactose, MDG, and OMG stimulated CS+ licking above CS- levels. However, only glucose, MDG, and galactose conditioned significant CS+ preferences, with the SGLT3 ligands (glucose, MDG) producing the strongest preferences. Fructose, which is not a ligand for SGLTs, failed to stimulate CS+ intake or preference. Experiment 3 revealed that IG infusion of MDG+phloridzin (an SGLT1/3 antagonist) blocked MDG appetition, whereas phloridzin had minimal effects on glucose-induced appetition. However, adding phloretin (a GLUT2 antagonist) to the glucose+phloridzin infusion blocked glucose appetition. Taken together, these findings suggest that humoral signals generated by intestinal SGLT1 and SGLT3, and to a lesser degree, GLUT2, mediate post-oral sugar appetition in mice. The MDG results indicate that sugar metabolism is not essential for the post-oral intake-stimulating and preference-conditioning actions of sugars in mice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fructose; galactose; glucose; post-oral sugar conditioning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23926132      PMCID: PMC3798804          DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00297.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  66 in total

1.  The role of sodium-coupled glucose co-transporter 3 in the satiety effect of portal glucose sensing.

Authors:  Fabien Delaere; Adeline Duchampt; Lourdes Mounien; Pascal Seyer; Céline Duraffourd; Carine Zitoun; Bernard Thorens; Gilles Mithieux
Journal:  Mol Metab       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 7.422

2.  Dose-dependent effects of peptide YY(3-36) on conditioned taste aversion in rats.

Authors:  Prasanth K Chelikani; Alvin C Haver; Roger D Reidelberger
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 3.  Nutrient sensing in the gastrointestinal tract: possible role for nutrient transporters.

Authors:  H E Raybould
Journal:  J Physiol Biochem       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.158

Review 4.  How food preferences are learned: laboratory animal models.

Authors:  A Sclafani
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 6.297

5.  The regulation of K- and L-cell activity by GLUT2 and the calcium-sensing receptor CasR in rat small intestine.

Authors:  Oliver J Mace; Marcus Schindler; Sonal Patel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 6.  Gut chemosensing: interactions between gut endocrine cells and visceral afferents.

Authors:  Helen E Raybould
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.145

7.  Activation of sodium-glucose cotransporter 1 ameliorates hyperglycemia by mediating incretin secretion in mice.

Authors:  Ryuichi Moriya; Takashi Shirakura; Junko Ito; Satoshi Mashiko; Toru Seo
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 4.310

8.  Stimulation of gastric inhibitory polypeptide release in ob/ob mice by oral administration of sugars and their analogues.

Authors:  P R Flatt; P Kwasowski; C J Bailey
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.798

9.  Taste-independent nutrient selection is mediated by a brain-specific Na+ /solute co-transporter in Drosophila.

Authors:  Monica Dus; Minrong Ai; Greg S B Suh
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Intravascular food reward.

Authors:  Albino J Oliveira-Maia; Craig D Roberts; Q David Walker; Brooke Luo; Cynthia Kuhn; Sidney A Simon; Miguel A L Nicolelis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  44 in total

1.  Capsaicin-induced visceral deafferentation does not attenuate flavor conditioning by intragastric fat infusions in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2019-06-19

2.  Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-02-10

3.  CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J Mice Differ in Their Oral and Postoral Attraction to Glucose and Fructose.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Austin S Vural; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 4.  From appetite setpoint to appetition: 50years of ingestive behavior research.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-01-02

5.  Post-oral fat stimulation of intake and conditioned flavor preference in C57BL/6J mice: A concentration-response study.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-02-28

6.  Rapid post-oral stimulation of intake and flavor conditioning in rats by glucose but not a non-metabolizable glucose analog.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-05-06

7.  Flavor preference conditioning by different sugars in sweet ageusic Trpm5 knockout mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-12

8.  Flavor change and food deprivation are not critical for post-oral glucose appetition in mice.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-04

9.  Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-08-12

10.  MCH receptor deletion does not impair glucose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Antoine Adamantidis; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-05-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.