Literature DB >> 25245733

Outcomes of a metal-on-metal total hip replacement system.

G S Matharu1, K Theivendran, P B Pynsent, L Jeys, A M Pearson, D J Dunlop.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: High short-term failure rates have been reported for a variety of metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip replacements (THRs) owing to adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD). This has led to the withdrawal of certain poorly performing THRs. This study analysed the outcomes of a MoM THR system.
METHODS: Between 2004 and 2010, 578 uncemented MoM THRs (511 patients, mean age: 60.0 years) were implanted at one specialist centre. The THR system used consisted of the Corail(®) stem, Pinnacle(®) cup, Ultamet(®) liner and Articul/eze(®) femoral head (all DePuy, Leeds, UK). All patients were recalled for clinical review with imaging performed as necessary.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration was 5.0 years (range: 1.0-9.1 years). Overall, 39 hips (6.7%) in 38 patients (all 36 mm femoral head size) underwent revision at a mean time of 3.5 years (range: 0.01-8.3 years) from the index THR with 30 revisions (77%) performed in women. The cumulative eight-year survival rate for all THRs was 88.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78.5-93.4%), with no difference (p=0.053) between male (95.2%, 95% CI: 84.2-98.7%) and female patients (85.3%, 95% CI: 70.2-92.1%) at eight years. Seventeen revisions (44%) were performed for ARMD. There was no significant difference in absolute postoperative Oxford hip scores between men and women (p=0.608). The mean acetabular inclination in unrevised THRs was 44.0°. Forty-seven non-revised THRs (8.7%) had blood metal ion concentrations above recommended thresholds (seven had periprosthetic effusions).
CONCLUSIONS: Although this MoM THR system has not failed as dramatically as other similar designs, we recommend against continued use and advise regular clinical surveillance to identify ARMD early.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25245733      PMCID: PMC4473440          DOI: 10.1308/003588414X14055925058030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  37 in total

1.  Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome.

Authors:  G Grammatopoulos; G Grammatopolous; H Pandit; Y-M Kwon; R Gundle; P McLardy-Smith; D J Beard; D W Murray; H S Gill
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-08

2.  The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores.

Authors:  D W Murray; R Fitzpatrick; K Rogers; H Pandit; D J Beard; A J Carr; J Dawson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-08

3.  Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear.

Authors:  D J Langton; T J Joyce; S S Jameson; J Lord; M Van Orsouw; J P Holland; A V F Nargol; K A De Smet
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-02

4.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.

Authors:  T A Gruen; G M McNeice; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Comparative survival of uncemented acetabular components following primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  James L Howard; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Youlonda A Loechler; Cathy D Schleck; William S Harmsen; Daniel J Berry; Miguel E Cabanela; Arlen D Hanssen; Mark W Pagnano; Robert T Trousdale; David G Lewallen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The 2012 Otto Aufranc Award: The interpretation of metal ion levels in unilateral and bilateral hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Catherine Van Der Straeten; George Grammatopoulos; Harinderjit S Gill; Alessandro Calistri; Patricia Campbell; Koen A De Smet
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing.

Authors:  S Glyn-Jones; H Pandit; Y-M Kwon; H Doll; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-12

8.  The epidemiology of bearing surface usage in total hip arthroplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Steven Kurtz; Edmund Lau; Kevin Ong; Vanessa Chiu; Thomas P Vail; Harry E Rubash; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings.

Authors:  H Pandit; S Glyn-Jones; P McLardy-Smith; R Gundle; D Whitwell; C L M Gibbons; S Ostlere; N Athanasou; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-07

10.  Mortality and implant revision rates of hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis: registry based cohort study.

Authors:  D J W McMinn; K I E Snell; J Daniel; R B C Treacy; P B Pynsent; R D Riley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-06-14
View more
  9 in total

1.  Frequent femoral neck osteolysis with Birmingham mid-head resection resurfacing arthroplasty in young patients.

Authors:  Asaad Asaad; Alister Hart; Michael M Y Khoo; Kevin Ilo; Gavin Schaller; Jonathan D J Black; Sarah Muirhead-Allwood
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Long-term results of metal on metal total hip arthroplasty in younger patients (<55yrs).

Authors:  Muhammad Umar; Noman Jahangir; Qasim Malik; Steven Kershaw; Keith Barnes; Syam Morapudi
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-05-07

3.  Risk factors for failure of the 36 mm metal-on-metal Pinnacle total hip arthroplasty system: a retrospective single-centre cohort study.

Authors:  G S Matharu; R S Nandra; F Berryman; A Judge; P B Pynsent; D J Dunlop
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Explant analysis of the Biomet Magnum/ReCap metal-on-metal hip joint.

Authors:  S C Scholes; B J Hunt; V M Richardson; D J Langton; E Smith; T J Joyce
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.853

5.  Long-term results of the M2A-38-mm metal-on-metal articulation.

Authors:  Carlo Trevisan; Stefano Piscitello; Raymond Klumpp; Tonino Mascitti
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-12-07

6.  Retrospective cohort study of the performance of the Pinnacle metal on metal (MoM) total hip replacement: a single-centre investigation in combination with the findings of a national retrieval centre.

Authors:  David John Langton; Raghavendra Prasad Sidaginamale; Peter Avery; Sue Waller; Ghanshyabhai Tank; James Lord; Thomas Joyce; Nick Cooke; Raj Logishetty; Antoni Viraf Francis Nargol
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  High Re-Operation Rates Using Conserve Metal-On-Metal Total Hip Articulations.

Authors:  S L Mogensen; T Jakobsen; H Christoffersen; N Krarup
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2016-03-29

Review 8.  Prevalence of Failure due to Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris in Modern, Medium and Large Diameter Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements--The Effect of Novel Screening Methods: Systematic Review and Metaregression Analysis.

Authors:  Aleksi Reito; Olli Lainiala; Petra Elo; Antti Eskelinen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Survivorship of a modular acetabular cup system: medium- to long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Kirk Kindsfater; Jim Lesko
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2017-08-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.