BACKGROUND: Hard-on-hard bearings offer the potential to improve the survivorship of total hip arthroplasty implants. However, the specific indications for the use of these advanced technologies remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to characterize the epidemiology of bearing surface utilization in total hip arthroplasty in the United States with respect to patient, hospital, geographic, and payer characteristics. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to analyze bearing type and demographic characteristics associated with 112,095 primary total hip arthroplasties performed in the United States between October 1, 2005, and December 31, 2006. The prevalence of each type of total hip arthroplasty bearing was calculated for population subgroups as a function of age, sex, census region, payer class, and hospital type. RESULTS: The most commonly reported bearing was metal-on-polyethylene (51%) followed by metal-on-metal (35%) and ceramic-on-ceramic (14%). Metal-on-polyethylene bearings were most commonly reported in female Medicare patients who were sixty-five to seventy-four years old, while metal-on-metal and ceramic-on-ceramic bearings were most commonly reported in privately insured male patients who were less than sixty-five years old. Thirty-three percent of patients over sixty-five years old had a hard-on-hard bearing reported. There was substantial regional variation in bearing usage; the highest prevalence of metal-on-polyethylene bearings was reported in the Northeast and at nonteaching hospitals, and the highest prevalence of metal-on-metal bearings was reported in the South and at teaching hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The usage of total hip arthroplasty bearings varies considerably by patient characteristics, hospital type, and geographic location throughout the United States. Despite uncertain advantages in older patients, hard-on-hard bearings are commonly used in patients over the age of sixty-five years. Further study is necessary to define the appropriate indications for these advanced technologies in total hip arthroplasty.
BACKGROUND: Hard-on-hard bearings offer the potential to improve the survivorship of total hip arthroplasty implants. However, the specific indications for the use of these advanced technologies remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to characterize the epidemiology of bearing surface utilization in total hip arthroplasty in the United States with respect to patient, hospital, geographic, and payer characteristics. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to analyze bearing type and demographic characteristics associated with 112,095 primary total hip arthroplasties performed in the United States between October 1, 2005, and December 31, 2006. The prevalence of each type of total hip arthroplasty bearing was calculated for population subgroups as a function of age, sex, census region, payer class, and hospital type. RESULTS: The most commonly reported bearing was metal-on-polyethylene (51%) followed by metal-on-metal (35%) and ceramic-on-ceramic (14%). Metal-on-polyethylene bearings were most commonly reported in female Medicare patients who were sixty-five to seventy-four years old, while metal-on-metal and ceramic-on-ceramic bearings were most commonly reported in privately insured male patients who were less than sixty-five years old. Thirty-three percent of patients over sixty-five years old had a hard-on-hard bearing reported. There was substantial regional variation in bearing usage; the highest prevalence of metal-on-polyethylene bearings was reported in the Northeast and at nonteaching hospitals, and the highest prevalence of metal-on-metal bearings was reported in the South and at teaching hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The usage of total hip arthroplasty bearings varies considerably by patient characteristics, hospital type, and geographic location throughout the United States. Despite uncertain advantages in older patients, hard-on-hard bearings are commonly used in patients over the age of sixty-five years. Further study is necessary to define the appropriate indications for these advanced technologies in total hip arthroplasty.
Authors: Manny Porat; Javad Parvizi; Peter F Sharkey; Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Robert L Barrack Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Jacob M Elkins; Karen M Kruger; Douglas R Pedersen; John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2011-08-02 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Xinyi Jiang; Taishi Sato; Zhenyu Yao; Michael Keeney; Jukka Pajarinen; Tzu-Hua Lin; Florence Loi; Kensuke Egashira; Stuart Goodman; Fan Yang Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Allison J Rao; Christophe Nich; Lakshmi S Dhulipala; Emmanuel Gibon; Roberto Valladares; Stefan Zwingenberger; R Lane Smith; Stuart B Goodman Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2012-12-05 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Steven M Kurtz; Jeffrey M Toth; Ryan Siskey; Lauren Ciccarelli; Dan Macdonald; Jorge Isaza; Todd Lanman; Ilona Punt; Marla Steinbeck; Jan Goffin; André van Ooij Journal: Semin Spine Surg Date: 2012-03-01