Literature DB >> 25197473

Complete genome sequence of the Phaeobacter gallaeciensis type strain CIP 105210(T) (= DSM 26640(T) = BS107(T)).

Oliver Frank1, Silke Pradella1, Manfred Rohde2, Carmen Scheuner1, Hans-Peter Klenk1, Markus Göker1, Jörn Petersen1.   

Abstract

Phaeobacter gallaeciensis CIP 105210(T) (= DSM 26640(T) = BS107(T)) is the type strain of the species Phaeobacter gallaeciensis. The genus Phaeobacter belongs to the marine Roseobacter group (Rhodobacteraceae, Alphaproteobacteria). Phaeobacter species are effective colonizers of marine surfaces, including frequent associations with eukaryotes. Strain BS107(T) was isolated from a rearing of the scallop Pecten maximus. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence, comprising eight circular replicons with a total of 4,448 genes. In addition to a high number of extrachromosomal replicons, the genome contains six genomic island and three putative prophage regions, as well as a hybrid between a plasmid and a circular phage. Phylogenomic analyses confirm previous results, which indicated that the originally reported P. gallaeciensis type-strain deposit DSM 17395 belongs to P. inhibens and that CIP 105210(T) (= DSM 26640(T)) is the sole genome-sequenced representative of P. gallaeciensis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alphaproteobacteria; Phaeobacter inhibens; Plasmid wealth; Replication systems; Roseobacter group; Sister species

Year:  2014        PMID: 25197473      PMCID: PMC4148982          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.5179110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain CIP 105210T (= BS107T = DSM 26640T) is the type strain of , the type species of , a genus of marine species of (, ). BS107T was isolated from the scallop Pecten maximus and was initially described as the type strain of [1]. After comprehensive reclassifications of genera, BS107T became the type strain of the species [2], currently comprising the species , , , and . A recent study [3] revealed the non-identity of the reported identical deposits DSM 17395 and CIP 105210T and confirmed that the strain CIP 105210T represents the original isolate BS107T, which is now deposited in the DSMZ open collection as DSM 26640T. In contrast, strain DSM 17395 was reclassified as a representative of the sister species Analysis of their similar, but distinct metabolic capacities allowed for a discrimination between the two strains, which were originally reported to represent the same type strain [3]. Thus, in the absence of sequenced genomes, the assignment to species was essentially based on deviating plasmid profiles and molecular analyses (16S rDNA, ITS, DNA-DNA hybridization), which showed convergent results. The genus Phaeobacer comprises effective surface colonizers. Comparative analyses of strains DSM 17395 and DSM 24588 (= 2.10) revealed a high level of adaptation to life on surfaces [4]. The production of the characteristic antibiotic tropodithietic acid (TDA) correlates with the formation of a brown pigment that is eponymous for [1]. Current scientific interest in is based on the role of its strains as probiotic agents in fish aquaculture [5] and as agents of bleaching diseases in marine red algae [6], as well as on their potential regulatory activity during phytoplankton blooms [7] via so-called roseobacticides [8]. Here we present the complete genome sequence of CIP 105210T, together with a summary classification and a set of features, including insights into genome architecture, genomic islands and phages.

Classification and features

16S rRNA gene analysis

Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of CIP 105210T in a 16S rDNA gene sequence based tree. The sequences of the four 16S rRNA identical gene copies in the genome differ by five nucleotides from the previously published 16S rDNA gene sequence (Y13244 [1]).
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of relative to the type strains of the other species within the genus and the neighboring genus . The tree was inferred from 1,381 aligned characters of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion as previously described [9]. spp. were included in the dataset for use as outgroup taxa. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 1,000 ML bootstrap replicates (left) and from 1,000 maximum-parsimony bootstrap replicates (right) if larger than 60% [9]. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [10] are labeled with one asterisk, those also listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks. Genome sequences are available for (DQ514304) [11], (AY177712) [12], (AM943630) [13], (DQ981416) [14], (IMG2545691711, this publication), (AM900415) [15], (AY005463) [16] and (AF098491) [17].

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of relative to the type strains of the other species within the genus and the neighboring genus . The tree was inferred from 1,381 aligned characters of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion as previously described [9]. spp. were included in the dataset for use as outgroup taxa. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 1,000 ML bootstrap replicates (left) and from 1,000 maximum-parsimony bootstrap replicates (right) if larger than 60% [9]. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [10] are labeled with one asterisk, those also listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks. Genome sequences are available for (DQ514304) [11], (AY177712) [12], (AM943630) [13], (DQ981416) [14], (IMG2545691711, this publication), (AM900415) [15], (AY005463) [16] and (AF098491) [17]. A representative genomic 16S rDNA gene sequence of CIP 105210T was compared with the Greengenes database for determining the weighted relative frequencies of taxa and (truncated) keywords as previously described [9], to infer the taxonomic and environmental affiliation of the strain. The most frequently occurring genera were (30.2%), (29.4%), (13.9%), (13.7%) and (3.6%) (698 hits in total). Regarding the 30 hits to sequences from members of the species, the average identity within HSPs (high-scoring segment pairs) was 99.6%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 18.7%. Regarding the 20 hits to sequences from other members of the genus, the average identity within HSPs was 98.0%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 18.7%. Among all other species, the one yielding the highest score was (AY177712), which corresponded to a 16S rDNA gene identity of 99.5% and an HSP coverage of 18.6%. (Note that the Greengenes database uses the INSDC (= EMBL/NCBI/DDBJ) annotation, which is not an authoritative source for nomenclature or classification.) The highest-scoring environmental sequence was AJ296158 (Greengenes short name 'Spain:Galicia isolate str. PP-154'), which showed an identity of 99.8% and an HSP coverage of 18.7%. The most frequently occurring keywords within the labels of all environmental samples which yielded hits were 'microbi' (2.8%), 'marin' (2.5%), 'coral' (2.4%), 'sediment' (2.0%) and 'biofilm' (1.9%) (509 hits in total). Environmental samples which yielded hits of a higher score than the highest scoring species were not found.

Morphology and physiology

Cells of BS 107T stain Gram-negative and are ovoid-shaped rods ranging 0.7-1.0 µm in width and 1.7-2.5 µm in length. Motility is achieved by means of a polar flagellum (not visible in Figure 2). Young colonies grown on Marine Broth (MB) at 23°C are 0.5 mm in diameter, circular, smooth, convex and brownish with regular edges [1]. Colonies incubated for 7 days are 2 mm in diameter with irregular edges and produce a brown, diffusible pigment. Cells grow at temperatures between 15 and 37°C; optimal growth was observed in a range between 23 and 27°C. The optimal pH is 7.0, with growth occurring up to pH 10.0 but none below pH 4.0. Cells grow at salt concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 2.0 M NaCl, with 0.2 M being the optimal concentration. Additional thiamine (vitamin B2) is required for growth in minimal medium. Cells exhibit catalase and oxidase activity, but they do not exhibit amylase, gelatinase, ß-galactosidase, tweenase, DNase, urease, arginine dihydrolase, lysine decarboxylase and ornithine decarboxylase activities [1].
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of P. gallaeciensis CIP 105210T.

Scanning electron micrograph of P. gallaeciensis CIP 105210T. BS107T is able to use the following substrates as sole carbon source and energy source: D- mannose, D-galactose, D-fructose, D-glucose, D-xylose, melibiose, trehalose, maltose, cellobiose, sucrose, meso-erythritol, D-mannitol, glycerol, D-sorbitol, meso-inositol, succinate, propionate, butyrate, γ-aminobutyrate, DL-hydroxybutyrate, 2-ketoglutarate, pyruvate, fumarate, glycine, L-a-alanine, p-alanine, L-glutamate, L-lysine, L-arginine, L-ornithine, L-proline, acetate and leucine. Bacteriochlorophyll a was not detected [1]. The metabolic properties of CIP 105210T and the strains DSM 17395, DSM 24588 (= 2.10) and DSM 16374T (= T5T) were compared using the more sensitive Phenotype MicroArray (PM) technology [3]. Here, using the statistical analysis (clustering and discretization) approaches as implemented in “opm” [18,19], the non-identity of strains CIP 105210T and DSM 17395 could be demonstrated despite an overall similar physiology. Differences could be found regarding the respiration of tyramine, which was positive in DSM 17395 and negative in CIP 105210T, and for butyrate, for which respiration was found to be negative in DSM 17395 and positive in CIP 105210T [3]. A summary of the classification and features of CIP 105210T is presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Classification and general features of BS107T according to the MIGS recommendations [20] published by the Genome Standards Consortium [21].

MIGS ID    Property    Term    Evidence code
    Domain Bacteria    TAS [22]
    Phylum Proteobacteria    TAS [23]
    Class Alphaproteobacteria    TAS [24,25]
    Current classification    Order Rhodobacterales    TAS [25,26]
    Family Rhodobacteraceae    TAS [25,27]
    Genus Phaeobacter    TAS [1,28]
    Species Phaeobacter gallaeciensis    TAS [1]
    Subspecific genetic lineage (strain)    BS107T    TAS [1]
MIGS-12    Reference for biomaterial    Ruiz-Ponte et al. 1998    TAS [1]
    Gram stain    Gram-negative    TAS [1]
    Cell shape    ovoid-rod-shaped    TAS [1]
    Motility    motile, via polar flagella    TAS [1]
    Sporulation    not reported
    Temperature range    15-37°C, mesophile    TAS [1]
    Optimum temperature    23-27°C    TAS [1]
    Salinity    0.1-2.0 M NaC1    TAS [1]
MIGS-22    Relationship to oxygen    aerobe    TAS [1]
    Carbon source    complex substrates, butyrate, DL-hydroxybutyrate, D-xylose    TAS [1]
    Energy metabolism    chemoheterotrophic    TAS [1]
MIGS-6    Habitat    seawater, Pecten maximus    TAS [1]
MIGS-6.2    pH    4.0-10.0, optimum 7.0    TAS [1]
MIGS-15    Biotic relationship    free living, facultative symbiont    TAS [1]
MIGS-14    Known pathogenicity    -    IDA
MIGS-16    Specific host    Pecten maximus
MIGS-18    Health status of host    not reported
    Biosafety level    1    TAS [29]
MIGS-19    Trophic level    heterotroph    TAS [1]
MIGS-23.1    Isolation    seawater of larval cultures of the scallop Pecten maximus    TAS [1]
MIGS-4    Geographic location    A Coruna, Galicia, Spain    TAS [1]
MIGS-5    Time of sample collection    not reported
MIGS-4.1    Latitude    43.3619
MIGS-4.2    Longitude    -8.410
MIGS-4.3    Depth    not reported
MIGS-4.4    Altitude    about sea level

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). Evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [30].

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). Evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [30].

Chemotaxonomy

The chemical composition of strain BS107T confirmed ubiquinones as the sole respiratory lipoquinones and revealed Q10 as predominant. Polar lipids consisted of an unidentified phospholipid, two uncharacterized lipids, aminolipids, phosphatidylenthanolamine, phosphatidylglycerole and phosphatidylcholine [2]. The major fatty acids are the monounsaturated acids C18:1 ω7c (76.1%), and 11-methyl C18:1 ω7c (6.1%), followed by hydroxy fatty acid C16:0 2-OH (5.1%) as well as C16:0 (4.0%), C14:1 (3.1%), C18:0 (2.6%), C10:0 3-OH (2.2%) and C18:1 ω9c (0.9%) [2].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Growth conditions and DNA extraction

A culture of CIP 105210T was grown aerobically in 100 ml of DSMZ medium 514 [31] on a shaker at 28°C. Genomic DNA was isolated using the Qiagen Genomic DNA Kit, following the standard protocol for Bacteria 500G provided by the manufacturer. The extracted DNA had a concentration of 200 ng/µl. The quality of the DNA was checked with the NanoDrop.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome of CIP 105210T was sequenced using the Roche/454 GS FLX Titanium sequencing platform [Table 2]. A draft assembly based on 247,768 reads of a standard shotgun library and 204,863 reads of a 3 kbp paired-end library (LGC Genomics, Berlin, Germany) with a total of 138 Mb (22-fold coverage) was generated with Newbler assembler, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). This assembly consisted of 45 contigs 26 of which could be joined into 15 scaffolds. Gaps resulting from repetitive sequences were closed by PCR followed by Sanger sequencing, yielding a final genome size of 4,540,155 bp, that consists of one circular chromosome of 3,776,653 bp and seven circular plasmids.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID   Property   Term
MIGS-31   Finishing quality   Finished
MIGS-28   Libraries used   One draft assembly of standard shotgun library, one 3 kbp paired-end library
MIGS-29   Sequencing platforms   Roche/454 GS FLX Titanium
MIGS-31.2   Sequencing coverage   22 ×
MIGS-30   Assemblers   Newbler assembler version 2.6 (Software Release: 2.6 (20110517_1502)
MIGS-32   Gene calling method   Prodigal 1.4
   INSDC ID   Pending
   GenBank Date of Release   Pending
   GOLD ID   Gi24053
   NCBI project ID   188096
   Database: IMG   2531839720
MIGS-13   Source material identifier   CIP 105210T
   Project relevance   Tree of Life, carbon cycle, scallop rearing, plasmid

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [32] as part of the Integrated Microbial Genomes Expert Review (IMG/ER) annotation pipeline [33]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases.

Genome properties

The CIP 105210T genome statistics are provided in Table 3 and Figures 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d, 3e, 3f, 3g, 3h. The genome consists of eight circular replicons with a total length of 4,540,155 bp and a G+C content of 59.44%. The replicons correspond to a single chromosome (3,776,653 bp) and seven extrachromosomal elements ranging in size between 255,493 bp and 40,170 bp. From a total of 4,448 predicted genes, 4,369 were protein coding genes and 79 RNA genes. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome statistics

    Attribute    Value    % of Total
    Genome size (bp)    4,540,155    100.00
    DNA coding region (bp)    4,056,108    89.34
    DNA G+C content (bp)    2,698,552    59.44
    Number of replicons    8
    Extrachromosomal elements    7
    Total genes    4,448    100.00
    RNA genes    79    1.78
    rRNA operons    4
    tRNA genes    59    1.33
    Protein-coding genes    4,369    98.22
    Genes with function prediction    3,595    80.82
    Genes in paralog clusters    3,475    78.13
    Genes assigned to COGs    3,422    76.93
    Genes assigned Pfam domains    3,657    82.22
    Genes with signal peptides    457    10.27
    Genes with transmembrane helices    975    21.92
    CRISPR repeats    0
Figure 3a

Circular graphical map of the chromosome. From margin to center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 3b

Circular graphical map of the extrachromosomal replicon pGal_A255. From margin to center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 3c

Circular graphical map of the extrachromosomal replicon pGal_B134. From margin to center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 3d

Circular graphical map of the extrachromosomal replicon pGal_C110. From margin to center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 3e

Circular graphical map of the extrachromosomal replicon pGal_D78. From margin to center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 3f

Circular graphical map of the extrachromosomal replicon pGal_E78. From margin to center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 3g

Circular graphical map of the extrachromosomal replicon pGal_F69. From margin to center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 3h

Circular graphical map of the extrachromosomal replicon pGal_G40. From margin to center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code    Value    %age     Description
J    170    4.51     Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A    1    0.03     RNA processing and modification
K    310    8.23     Transcription
L    150    3.98     Replication, recombination and repair
B    3    0.08     Chromatin structure and dynamics
D    35    0.93     Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y    0    0     Nuclear structure
V    50    1.33     Defense mechanisms
T    163    4.33     Signal transduction mechanisms
M    204    5.41     Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N    53    1.41     Cell motility
Z    0    0.00     Cytoskeleton
W    0    0     Extracellular structures
U    87    2.31     Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
O    146    3.87     Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C    235    6.24     Energy production and conversion
G    212    5.63     Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E    436    11.57     Amino acid transport and metabolism
F    81    2.15     Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H    160    4.28     Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I    151    4.01     Lipid transport and metabolism
P    205    5.44     Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q    132    3.50     Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R    451    12.00     General function prediction only
S    333    9.00     Function unknown
-    1,026    23.07     Not in COGs
Circular graphical map of the chromosome. From margin to center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew. Circular graphical map of the extrachromosomal replicon pGal_A255. From margin to center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew. Circular graphical map of the extrachromosomal replicon pGal_B134. From margin to center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew. Circular graphical map of the extrachromosomal replicon pGal_C110. From margin to center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew. Circular graphical map of the extrachromosomal replicon pGal_D78. From margin to center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew. Circular graphical map of the extrachromosomal replicon pGal_E78. From margin to center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew. Circular graphical map of the extrachromosomal replicon pGal_F69. From margin to center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew. Circular graphical map of the extrachromosomal replicon pGal_G40. From margin to center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Insights into the genome

Unique genes

A search for specific genes in the genome of CIP 105210T compared to the strains DSM 24588 (= 2.10), DSM 16374T (= T5T) and DSM 17395, based on an e-value of 1e-5 and a minimum identity of 30%, resulted in a total number of 551 specific genes. 296 (54%) of these genes were located on the chromosome and 255 (46%) on extrachromosomal replicons. In comparison with the other completely sequenced bacterial strains of the genus , 8% of the chromosomal and 35% of the extrachromosomal CIP 105210T genes were unique, thus reflecting the considerable contribution of extrachromosomal elements to unique gene content. The observed distribution may be influenced by the presence of two chromosome-encoded bacterial MobC mobilization proteins (Gal_00154, Gal_01073). MobC, which is missing in all three completely sequenced strains, is part of the relaxosome at the origin of transfer and increases the frequency of plasmid mobilization and therefore conjugal transfer of plasmids [34], which is also in agreement with the comparably large number of seven extrachromosomal replicons present in CIP 105210T. The probable function of some of the unique genes is explained below. Genes Gal_01405 and Gal_01407 constitute methane monooxygenases (EC 1.14.13.25) facilitating the degradation of aromatic compounds and phenols [35]. Gal_01397, a monoamine oxidase could provide an additional source of ammonium [36]. Unique genes are also provided by phage-like elements. In CIP 105210T these so-called “morons” (because they add “more on” the genome [37]) comprise, e.g., an ABC-2 family drug transporter (Gal_01752) [38], and a negative regulator of beta-lactamase expression (Gal_02239).

Genomic islands

Six genomic islands could be identified on the chromosome with the web-based island-viewer system [39]. Island-viewer combines the methods IslandPick [40], which uses a comparative genomics approach, SIGI-HMM [41], which relies upon deviating codon usage signatures, and IslandPath-DIMOB [42], which identifies genomic islands based on deviating GC content, dinucleotide bias in gene clusters and the presence of island specific genes like mobility genes and tRNAs. Island-I ranging from position 155,977 to 177,667 (21,690 bp) contains a tRNA gene (Phe GAA, Gal_00137) next to a site-specific recombinase XerD (Gal_00138) and the bacterial mobilization protein (MobC, Gal_00154; see above). Furthermore, it contains a transcriptional regulator of the LysR family (Gal_00160) and an adjacent ABC-type transport system for glycine/proline/betaine. Island-II (422,441 to 434,165; 11,725 bp) mainly consists of hypothetical proteins, but it also contains a large type II restriction enzyme (905aa, Gal_00442) and another site specific XerD recombinase (Gal_00444) next to a tRNA for proline (Gal_00445). Island-III (1,085,143 to 1,096,105; 10,962 bp) contains three XerD recombinases in row (Gal_01065 to Gal_01067, a MobC protein (Gal_01073) and the typical VirD2 relaxase (Gal_01074) as well as the VirD4 coupling protein (Gal_01075) of type IV secretion systems [43] indicating a plasmid-derived origin of this island. Island-IV (1,626,663 to 1,641,677; 15,014 bp) contains an ABC-type cobalt transport system and a XerC recombinase (Gal_01616). Island-V (2,821,359 to 2,848,860; 27,501 bp) consists mainly of regulated TRAP C4-dicarboxylate and ABC-type dipeptide/oligopeptide/nickel transport proteins and also the epsilon subunit of DNA polymerase III (Gal_02817). Island-VI (3,328,870 to 3,344,910; 16,040 bp) lies adjacent to a ribosomal rRNA-operon and contains an ABC-type amino acid/amide transport system and an E1 component of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (Gal_03286, E.C.: 1.2.4.1).

Phage-like elements

The presence of phage-like elements was analyzed with the online tool PHAST [44]. The program identified 16 genes representing a gene transfer agent (GTA [45];) and three incomplete clusters of phage-derived genes with sizes between 15 kb and 40 kb (Table 5).
Table 5

Prophage regions in the chromosome of CIP 105210T†

Region   Length   Completeness    Score    CDS    Coordinates    Specific keyword   GC%
1   14.2 kb   Questionable    80    16    1,566,488-1,580,693    Gene transfer agent (GTA)   64.6
2   25.1 kb   Incomplete    30    32    1,781,279-1,806,383    integrase, region invertase, helicase   56.9
3   14.7 kb   Incomplete    40    18    1,800,767-1,815,474    Portal protein, head maturation protease   57.7
4   39.6 kb   Incomplete    60    45    2,265,763-2,305,412    Integrase, peptidoglycan hydrolase   58.5

†Completedness, a prediction of whether the region contains an intact or incomplete prophage based on the applied criteria of PHAST; Score, the score of the region based on the applied criteria of PHAST; CDS, the number of coding sequences; Coordinates, the start and end positions of the region on the bacterial chromosome; GC%, the percentage of GC nucleotides of the region.

†Completedness, a prediction of whether the region contains an intact or incomplete prophage based on the applied criteria of PHAST; Score, the score of the region based on the applied criteria of PHAST; CDS, the number of coding sequences; Coordinates, the start and end positions of the region on the bacterial chromosome; GC%, the percentage of GC nucleotides of the region.

Extrachromosomal replicons

Complete genome sequencing of CIP 105210T resulted in eight replicons ranging from 40 kb to 3.8 MB in size. For the seven extrachromosomal replicons, ranging in size between 40 kb and 255 kb (Table 6), circular confirmation has been experimentally validated. The extrachromosomal replicons were analyzed as described in [46] and [47]. They contain characteristic replication modules [43] of the RepABC-, DnaA-like, RepA- and RepB-type comprising a replicase and a parAB partitioning operon [48]. Plasmid pGal_E78 also contains a replicase that is homologous to those of RepABC-type plasmids, but the partitioning genes repAB are missing. The solitary replicase cannot be classified according to the established scheme [49] and is designated as RepC_soli-1a (RepC' [50]). The respective replicases of the other extrachromosomal replicons that mediate the initiation of replication are designated according to the established classification scheme [51]. The numbering of specific replicases corresponds to plasmid compatibility groups that are required for a stable coexistence of the replicons within the same cell [49].
Table 6

General genomic features of the chromosome and extrachromosomal elements from strain CIP 105210T#

Replicon    No.   Replicase    Length (bp)    GC (%)   Topology   No. Genes#
Chromosome    1   DnaA    3,776,653    60   circular   3,703
pGal_A255    2   DnaA-like-I    255,493    58   circular   237
pGal_B134    3   RepABC-5    133,631    60   circular   155
pGal_C110    4   RepABC-8    109,815    56   circular   115
pGal_D78    5   RepB-I    77,876    62   circular   62
pGal_E78    6   RepC_soli-1a    77,775    55   circular   81
pGal_F69    7   RepA-I    68,752    58   circular   56
pGal_G40    8   RepABC-4    40,170    56   circular   51

#deduced from automatic annotation.

#deduced from automatic annotation. The comparison of the extrachromosomal replicons from CIP 105210T and DSM 17395 documents a strong conservation and long-range synteny of three replicons. The largest 255 kb DnaA-like-I replicon (pGal_A255) is slightly smaller than the 262 kb equivalent (NC_018291.1), sharing 89% identity on nucleotide level. The RepB-I type replicon pGal_D78 exactly matches the size of the DSM 17395 replicon (NC_018287.1, 91% identity), whereas the RepA-I type replicon pGal_F69 is slightly larger than its equivalent (65 kb; NC_018288.1, 91% identity). On the contrary, RepABC-type replicons are not present in the DSM 17395 genome. However, only two of the four additional plasmids, the RepABC-5 type replicon pGal_B134 and the RepC_soli-1a-type replicon pGal_E78 possess type IV secretion systems that are required for conjugative transfer [52]. Finally, the three replicons pGal_A255, pGal_B134, pGal_C110 are equipped with stabilizing toxin/antitoxin modules [53] (Table 7).
Table 7

Integrated Microbial Genome (IMG) locus tags of CIP 105210T genes for the initiation of replication, toxin/antitoxin modules and type IV secretion systems (T4SS) required for conjugation.

RepliconReplication InitiationPlasmid StabilityType IV Secretion
    Replicase    Locus Tag    Toxin    Antitoxin    VirB4    VirD4
Chromosome    DnaA    Gal_00001    -    -    -    -
pGal_A255    DnaA-like-I    Gal_03722    Gal_03770    Gal_03771    -    -
pGal_B134    RepABC-5    Gal_03960    Gal_03975    Gal_03974    Gal_04010    Gal_03992
pGal_C110    RepABC-8    Gal_04107    Gal_04110    Gal_04111    -    -
pGal_D78    RepB-I    Gal_04221    -    -    -    -
pGal_E78    RepC_soli-1a    Gal_04283    -    -    Gal_04360    Gal_04345
pGal_F69    RepA-I    Gal_04364    -    -    -    -
pGal_G40    RepABC-4    Gal_04417    -    -    -    -
The 255 kb DnaA-like-I replicon pGal_A255 is largely constituted by genes coding for proteins in COG E “amino-acid transport and metabolism” and COG P “inorganic ion metabolism” (Figure 4). The latter category comprises, for example, a Fe3+ siderophore complex (Gal_03846 to Gal_03848), which contains ferric-iron chelating agents that facilitate enhanced uptake of this essential compound [56]. pGal_A255 furthermore harbors six genes involved in chemotaxis, a tRNA (Gal_03828) and a cluster for the biosynthesis of coenzyme PQQ, a redox factor (Gal_03896). The genes for the synthesis of the antibiotic tropodithietic acid (TDA) [57] are consolidated in a cluster on pGal_A255 and comprise tdaA (Gal_03819), tdaB (Gal_03818), tdaC (Gal_03817), tdaE (Gal_03815) and tdaF (Gal_03802). The 134 kb RepABC-5 type plasmid pGal_B134 harbors in comparison to the other seven replicons the most chaperons (COG O, Figure 4), owing to an elevated presence of cytochromes and disulfide bond formation proteins. pGal_B134 also holds a dimethyladenosinetransferase (Gal_03978) that facilitates RNA methylation and a T4S system (Table 7), thus combining on this plasmid genes for epigenetic modifications. The RepABC-8 type plasmid pGal_C110 consists mainly of amino acid and carbohydrate transporters (COGs E and G) and biogenesis of secondary metabolites (COG Q). COG K, transcription is also elevated, due to the presence of 15 transcriptional regulators. On the RepB-I replicon pGal_D78, COG K transcription is elevated, owing to the presence of twelve transcriptional regulators and a RNA-polymerase (Gal_04277). This replicon also contains genes for siderophore synthetases (Gal_04241 to Gal_04247) and a catalase/peroxidase (Gal_04279). On the RepC_soli-1a plasmid pGal_E78, proteins of COG C energy production and conversion are constituted by pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 and E2 components, which play a role in the citrate cycle and gluconeogenesis. The RepA-I replicon pGal_F69 contains an RTX toxin [58] (Gal_04412) and exhibits a strong accumulation of COG M, “cell-envelope biogenesis”. It harbors several polysaccharide export proteins including a type I secretion system ABC transporter (Gal_04381, Gal_04382), and a complete rhamnose operon [59]. CIP 105210T (= DSM 26440T) forms strong biofilms (unpublished results) and the extrachromosomal 69 kb replicon seems to be responsible for the attached lifestyle as previously proposed for the strains DSM 17395 and DSM 24588 (2.10) [3]. pGal_G40 represents a hybrid between a plasmid and a circular phage, comparable to the coliphage N15 [60,61]. It contains an N-acyl-L-homoserine lactone synthetase (Gal_04460) and a complete repABC operon. This interesting finding draws a direct connection between RepABC directed replication [49], horizontal gene transfer and AHL-mediated quorum sensing [62].
Figure 4

Summary and representation of the assortment of replicons in CIP 105210T as previously described in [47]. Bars show the relative frequency of functional classes according to the database of clusters of orthologous groups of proteins (COGs). The cluster dendrogram arranges the replicons according to their overall codon usage. Codon-usage matrices were generated using yet unpublished scripts for the statistical analysis software R (version 2.15.0.) [54]. The hierarchical clustering analysis was conducted using the pvclust function [55] with “complete” as agglomeration method. Pvclust also returns the AU (Approximately Unbiased) values as statistical support for clusters in percent. Support values >95% are given in bold. Asterisks indicate the presence of genes for conjugation (T4SS) as listed in Table 7.

Summary and representation of the assortment of replicons in CIP 105210T as previously described in [47]. Bars show the relative frequency of functional classes according to the database of clusters of orthologous groups of proteins (COGs). The cluster dendrogram arranges the replicons according to their overall codon usage. Codon-usage matrices were generated using yet unpublished scripts for the statistical analysis software R (version 2.15.0.) [54]. The hierarchical clustering analysis was conducted using the pvclust function [55] with “complete” as agglomeration method. Pvclust also returns the AU (Approximately Unbiased) values as statistical support for clusters in percent. Support values >95% are given in bold. Asterisks indicate the presence of genes for conjugation (T4SS) as listed in Table 7. Genome sequencing of DSM 16374T (T5T) revealed the presence of the complete dissimilatory nitrate reduction pathway and anaerobic growth on nitrite has been validated experimentally [12]. The genes of the pathway are located on three different replicons, i.e. the chromosome, the DnaA-like I type plasmid pInhi_A227 and the RepABC-8 type plasmid pInhi_B88. The genome of the sister species CIP 105210T exhibits a conspicuous synteny for the chromosome and three extrachromosomal replicons (DnaA-like I (pGal_A255, pInhi_A227), RepB-I (pGal_D78, pInhi_C78), RepA-I (pGal_F69, pInhi_D69)). However, the RepABC-8 type plasmid including the crucial nitrous oxide reductase (EC 1.7.2.4) is missing in CIP 105210T, and this strain is accordingly unable to grow anaerobically.

Phylogenomic analyses

The phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene type-strain sequences places together with both and , whereas forms a cluster with and . Both clusters are set apart from each other, but the 16S rRNA gene tree is unresolved and does not allow one to infer the evolutionary interrelationships in this group. Previous results [4] showed that the reported type-strain deposit DSM 17395 belongs to and that CIP 105210T (= DSM 26640T) is the authentic type strain of . Moreover, the genome sequenced strain ANG1 has been referred to as based on 16S rRNA analyses [63], but our recent study revealed a well-supported association with and [4]. The relationships between these strains have not been coroborated using genome sequences. Thus, we used the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (GGDC) [64] to investigate the affiliation of strain ANG1 and the genomic similarities between and strains from available genome sequences and conducted phylogenomic analyses to address the relationship between and . Table 8 shows the results of the calculated digital DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH) similarities of CIP 105210T and DSM 16374T (T5T) to other strains. For DDH values ≤70% the respective query strain would be considered as belonging to a different species than the strain used as a reference [65,66].
Table 8

DDH similarities with standard deviations between CIP 105210T, DSM 16374T (T5T) and other strains calculated in silico with the GGDC server version 2.0 [64]. The numbers in parentheses are IMG Taxon IDs identifying the genome sequence.

Formulareference species        identities/HSP length [%]        P. gallaeciensis DSM 26640T (= CIP 105210T = BS107T)        identities/HSP length [%]        P. inhibens DSM 16374T (T5T)
P. inhibens DSM 24588 (2.10) (2501651220)        38.00% ± 2.49        79.50% ± 2.80
P. inhibens DSM 17395 (2510065029)        38.40% ± 2.50        78.70% ± 2.83
P. gallaeciensis ANG 1 (2526164696)        21.40% ± 2.34        21.10% ± 2.33
P. inhibens DSM 16374T (T5T) (2516653078)        38.20% ± 2.50        100%
P. gallaeciensis DSM 26640T (= CIP 105210T) (2545555837)        100%        38.20% ± 2.50
With the exception of ANG 1, which neither belongs to nor based on DDH values, the analysis supports the current classification. with the type strain DSM 16374T (T5T) includes the strains DSM 17395 and DSM 24588 (2.10), whereas the strain CIP 105210T (= DSM 26640T) is the sole representative of analyzed in the current study. For the phylogenomic analysis, protein sequences from the available genomes were retrieved from the IMG website ( DSM 23566T; ID 2516653081; DSM 24564T (13T), ID 2512047087; DSM 23529T (TF-218T), ID 2516493020; DSM 16374T (T5T), ID 2516653078) or from NCBI ( DSM 24588 (2.10), CP002972 – CP002975; P. sp. ANG1, AFCF00000000; CIP 105210T (= DSM 26640T), AOQA00000000; DSM 17395, CP002976 – CP002979; P. sp. Y4I, ABXF00000000). These sequences were investigated using the DSMZ phylogenomics pipeline as previously described [67-70] using NCBI BLAST [71], TribeMCL [72], OrthoMCL [73], MUSCLE [74], RASCAL [75], GBLOCKS [68] and MARE [76] to generate gene- and ortholog-content matrices as well as concatenated alignments of distinct selections of genes. Maximum likelihood (ML) [77] and maximum-parsimony (MP) [78,79] trees were inferred from the data matrices with RAxML [80,81] and PAUP* [82], respectively, as previously described [68,70,72,83]. The results of the phylogenomic analyses are shown in Figure 5. The “full” and MARE-filtered supermatrix trees were topologically identical and the tree of the latter analysis is shown in Figure 5 together with ML and MP bootstrap support values from all analyses if larger than 60%. The tree inferred from the core-gene matrix showed a distinct grouping within , i.e. DSM 17395 as sister of the clade comprising DSM 16374T (T5T) and DSM 24588 (2.10). The topologies of both MP and ML “full” and MARE-filtered supermatrix trees were identical, whereas the MP core-genes tree was topologically identical to the ML core-genes tree. Both gene-content and ortholog-content MP trees were topologically identical and showed DSM 16374T (T5T) as a sister taxon of DSM 24588 (2.10) and DSM 17395. Only the ML gene-content and ortholog-content trees deviated regarding the species boundaries, showing a clade comprising DSM 16374T (T5T) and CIP 105210T (= DSM 26640T) as well as a clade comprising DSM 24588 (2.10) and DSM 17395.
Figure 5

Phylogenetic tree inferred from the MARE-filtered supermatrix under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion [77] and rooted using the midpoint rooting approach [84]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above the branches (from left to right) are bootstrap support values [85] (if greater than 60%) from ML/MP MARE-filtered supermatrix; ML/MP unfiltered (full) supermatrix; ML/MP core-genes supermatrix; ML/MP gene-content matrix; ML/MP ortholog-content matrix. Values larger than 95% are shown in bold; dots indicate branches with maximum support under all settings. Genomes marked with stars have been renamed according to this study and [3].

Phylogenetic tree inferred from the MARE-filtered supermatrix under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion [77] and rooted using the midpoint rooting approach [84]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above the branches (from left to right) are bootstrap support values [85] (if greater than 60%) from ML/MP MARE-filtered supermatrix; ML/MP unfiltered (full) supermatrix; ML/MP core-genes supermatrix; ML/MP gene-content matrix; ML/MP ortholog-content matrix. Values larger than 95% are shown in bold; dots indicate branches with maximum support under all settings. Genomes marked with stars have been renamed according to this study and [3]. Thus, the analyses supported the earlier conclusion [3] that DSM 17395 belongs to . The analyses also confirmed that P. “gallaeciensis” ANG1 belongs neither to nor to and might therefore represent a novel, not yet named seventh species in the genus . Further, the analysis confirms CIP 105210T (= DSM 26640T) as the sole representative of the species .
  72 in total

Review 1.  The plasmid prophage N15: a linear DNA with covalently closed ends.

Authors:  V N Rybchin; A N Svarchevsky
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.501

2.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models.

Authors:  Alexandros Stamatakis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Genome sequence of Phaeobacter caeruleus type strain (DSM 24564(T)), a surface-associated member of the marine Roseobacter clade.

Authors:  Paul G Beyersmann; Olga Chertkov; Jörn Petersen; Anne Fiebig; Amy Chen; Amrita Pati; Natalia Ivanova; Alla Lapidus; Lynne A Goodwin; Patrick Chain; John C Detter; Manfred Rohde; Sabine Gronow; Nikos C Kyrpides; Tanja Woyke; Meinhard Simon; Markus Göker; Hans-Peter Klenk; Thorsten Brinkhoff
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2013-07-30

5.  Crystal structure of the ATP-binding subunit of an ABC transporter.

Authors:  L W Hung; I X Wang; K Nikaido; P Q Liu; G F Ames; S H Kim
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-12-17       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Genetic dissection of tropodithietic acid biosynthesis by marine roseobacters.

Authors:  Haifeng Geng; Jesper Bartholin Bruhn; Kristian F Nielsen; Lone Gram; Robert Belas
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; I-Min A Chen; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Philip Hugenholtz; Victor M Markowitz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  The genome sequence of Methanohalophilus mahii SLP(T) reveals differences in the energy metabolism among members of the Methanosarcinaceae inhabiting freshwater and saline environments.

Authors:  Stefan Spring; Carmen Scheuner; Alla Lapidus; Susan Lucas; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Hope Tice; Alex Copeland; Jan-Fang Cheng; Feng Chen; Matt Nolan; Elizabeth Saunders; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Athanasios Lykidis; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Lynne Goodwin; John C Detter; Thomas Brettin; Manfred Rohde; Markus Göker; Tanja Woyke; Jim Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Archaea       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.273

9.  PHAST: a fast phage search tool.

Authors:  You Zhou; Yongjie Liang; Karlene H Lynch; Jonathan J Dennis; David S Wishart
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Genome sequence of Phaeobacter daeponensis type strain (DSM 23529(T)), a facultatively anaerobic bacterium isolated from marine sediment, and emendation of Phaeobacter daeponensis.

Authors:  Marco Dogs; Hazuki Teshima; Jörn Petersen; Anne Fiebig; Olga Chertkov; Hajnalka Dalingault; Amy Chen; Amrita Pati; Lynne A Goodwin; Patrick Chain; John C Detter; Natalia Ivanova; Alla Lapidus; Manfred Rohde; Sabine Gronow; Nikos C Kyrpides; Tanja Woyke; Meinhard Simon; Markus Göker; Hans-Peter Klenk; Thorsten Brinkhoff
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2013-10-03
View more
  9 in total

1.  Genome-scale data suggest reclassifications in the Leisingera-Phaeobacter cluster including proposals for Sedimentitalea gen. nov. and Pseudophaeobacter gen. nov.

Authors:  Sven Breider; Carmen Scheuner; Peter Schumann; Anne Fiebig; Jörn Petersen; Silke Pradella; Hans-Peter Klenk; Thorsten Brinkhoff; Markus Göker
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  Complete genome sequence of DSM 30083(T), the type strain (U5/41(T)) of Escherichia coli, and a proposal for delineating subspecies in microbial taxonomy.

Authors:  Jan P Meier-Kolthoff; Richard L Hahnke; Jörn Petersen; Carmen Scheuner; Victoria Michael; Anne Fiebig; Christine Rohde; Manfred Rohde; Berthold Fartmann; Lynne A Goodwin; Olga Chertkov; Tbk Reddy; Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Victor Markowitz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Tanja Woyke; Markus Göker; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2014-12-08

3.  Draft genome sequence of the marine Rhodobacteraceae strain O3.65, cultivated from oil-polluted seawater of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

Authors:  Helge-Ansgar Giebel; Franziska Klotz; Sonja Voget; Anja Poehlein; Katrin Grosser; Andreas Teske; Thorsten Brinkhoff
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2016-10-13

4.  Phylogenomics of Rhodobacteraceae reveals evolutionary adaptation to marine and non-marine habitats.

Authors:  Meinhard Simon; Carmen Scheuner; Jan P Meier-Kolthoff; Thorsten Brinkhoff; Irene Wagner-Döbler; Marcus Ulbrich; Hans-Peter Klenk; Dietmar Schomburg; Jörn Petersen; Markus Göker
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  The limits to growth - energetic burden of the endogenous antibiotic tropodithietic acid in Phaeobacter inhibens DSM 17395.

Authors:  Sabine Eva Will; Meina Neumann-Schaal; Raymond Leopold Heydorn; Pascal Bartling; Jörn Petersen; Dietmar Schomburg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Fatal affairs - conjugational transfer of a dinoflagellate-killing plasmid between marine Rhodobacterales.

Authors:  Jürgen Tomasch; Victoria Ringel; Hui Wang; Heike M Freese; Pascal Bartling; Henner Brinkmann; John Vollmers; Michael Jarek; Irene Wagner-Döbler; Jörn Petersen
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2022-03

7.  Bacterial Community Assembly, Succession, and Metabolic Function during Outdoor Cultivation of Microchloropsis salina.

Authors:  Megan M Morris; Jeffrey A Kimbrel; Haifeng Geng; Mary Bao Tran-Gyamfi; Eizadora T Yu; Kenneth L Sale; Todd W Lane; Xavier Mayali
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 5.029

8.  Trajectories and Drivers of Genome Evolution in Surface-Associated Marine Phaeobacter.

Authors:  Heike M Freese; Johannes Sikorski; Boyke Bunk; Carmen Scheuner; Jan P Meier-Kolthoff; Cathrin Spröer; Lone Gram; Jörg Overmann
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Colonization of Non-biodegradable and Biodegradable Plastics by Marine Microorganisms.

Authors:  Claire Dussud; Cindy Hudec; Matthieu George; Pascale Fabre; Perry Higgs; Stéphane Bruzaud; Anne-Marie Delort; Boris Eyheraguibel; Anne-Leïla Meistertzheim; Justine Jacquin; Jingguang Cheng; Nolwenn Callac; Charlène Odobel; Sophie Rabouille; Jean-François Ghiglione
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 5.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.