| Literature DB >> 35254236 |
Jürgen Tomasch1, Victoria Ringel2, Hui Wang3, Heike M Freese2, Pascal Bartling2,4, Henner Brinkmann2, John Vollmers5, Michael Jarek6, Irene Wagner-Döbler3, Jörn Petersen2.
Abstract
The roseobacter group of marine bacteria is characterized by a mosaic distribution of ecologically important phenotypes. These are often encoded on mobile extrachromosomal replicons. So far, conjugation had only been experimentally proven between the two model organisms Phaeobacter inhibens and Dinoroseobacter shibae. Here, we show that two large natural RepABC-type plasmids from D. shibae can be transferred into representatives of all known major Rhodobacterales lineages. Complete genome sequencing of the newly established Phaeobacter inhibens transconjugants confirmed their genomic integrity. The conjugated plasmids were stably maintained as single copy number replicons in the genuine as well as the new host. Co-cultivation of Phaeobacter inhibens and the transconjugants with the dinoflagellate Prorocentrum minimum demonstrated that Phaeobacter inhibens is a probiotic strain that improves the yield and stability of the dinoflagellate culture. The transconjugant carrying the 191 kb plasmid, but not the 126 kb sister plasmid, killed the dinoflagellate in co-culture.Entities:
Keywords: Roseobacter; bacteria–algae interaction; conjugation; horizontal gene transfer
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35254236 PMCID: PMC9176285 DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000787
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Genom ISSN: 2057-5858
Fig. 1.Conjugational transfer of 126 and 191 kb plasmids within the roseobacter group. Phylogenomic tree of clades 1 to 10 (as defined by Bartling et al. [30]); the branches for the clades hve been collapsed and the complete tree is shown in Fig. S1. Naturally occurring homologues of the 126 and 191 kb plasmids are indicated in blue beside the respective leaf. Successful experimental conjugation of either plasmid is indicated in red. and are according to their natural pigmentation highlighted in brown and pink, respectively. Branch lengths show substitutions per site. Bootstrap values are shown near the branch nodes.
Fig. 2.Genome organization and ECR copy number of and strains. (a) Genome organization of and strains used for comparative analyses. Host cell and replicon affiliation is colour-coded in brown and pink for and , respectively. X indicates absence of the respective replicon. Chr, chromosome. ECRs are indicated by their size in kb. (b) The mean coverage was calculated via mapping of Illumina sequences on the different replicons. The coverage range of each replicon is illustrated in violin plots on the left-hand side and the chromosomal median indicated by a solid line. The 191 kb killer plasmid and the 126 kb sister plasmid are highlighted in red and orange, respectively.
Fig. 3.Co-cultivation of Prorocentrum minimum and . Axenic cultures of Prorocentrum minimum were inoculated with control strains ( Δ65kb and Δ65kbΔ262kb) or transconjugants carrying either the 191 kb killer plasmid of ( Δ65kbΔ262kb+191kb) or the 126 kb sister plasmid of ( Δ65kbΔ262kb+126kb). Cultures of Prorocentrum minimum in vitamin B12-replete and -limited medium (L1+B12, L1−B12) served as positive and negative controls, respectively. Mean values and standard deviations of eight replicates are shown. Control experiments without bacteria are shown in blue, co-cultivation experiments with reference strains and transconjugants are indicated in green and red/orange, respectively. d, Days. A.U.: arbitrary units