Literature DB >> 25172111

Gender categorization is abnormal in cochlear implant users.

Christina D Fuller1, Etienne Gaudrain, Jeanne N Clarke, John J Galvin, Qian-Jie Fu, Rolien H Free, Deniz Başkent.   

Abstract

In normal hearing (NH), the perception of the gender of a speaker is strongly affected by two anatomically related vocal characteristics: the fundamental frequency (F0), related to vocal pitch, and the vocal tract length (VTL), related to the height of the speaker. Previous studies on gender categorization in cochlear implant (CI) users found that performance was variable, with few CI users performing at the level of NH listeners. Data collected with recorded speech produced by multiple talkers suggests that CI users might rely more on F0 and less on VTL than NH listeners. However, because VTL cannot be accurately estimated from recordings, it is difficult to know how VTL contributes to gender categorization. In the present study, speech was synthesized to systematically vary F0, VTL, or both. Gender categorization was measured in CI users, as well as in NH participants listening to unprocessed (only synthesized) and vocoded (and synthesized) speech. Perceptual weights for F0 and VTL were derived from the performance data. With unprocessed speech, NH listeners used both cues (normalized perceptual weight: F0 = 3.76, VTL = 5.56). With vocoded speech, NH listeners still made use of both cues but less efficiently (normalized perceptual weight: F0 = 1.68, VTL = 0.63). CI users relied almost exclusively on F0 while VTL perception was profoundly impaired (normalized perceptual weight: F0 = 6.88, VTL = 0.59). As a result, CI users' gender categorization was abnormal compared to NH listeners. Future CI signal processing should aim to improve the transmission of both F0 cues and VTL cues, as a normal gender categorization may benefit speech understanding in competing talker situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25172111      PMCID: PMC4389960          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-014-0483-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  34 in total

1.  Sensitivity to isolated and concurrent intensity and fundamental frequency increments by cochlear implant users under natural listening conditions.

Authors:  Cheryl F Rogers; Eric W Healy; Allen A Montgomery
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spectral-ripple resolution correlates with speech reception in noise in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-21

3.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Breathiness as a feminine voice characteristic: a perceptual approach.

Authors:  John Van Borsel; Joke Janssens; Marc De Bodt
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  T'ain't the way you say it, it's what you say--perceptual continuity of voice and top-down restoration of speech.

Authors:  Jeanne Clarke; Etienne Gaudrain; Monita Chatterjee; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Speech perception in noise with a harmonic complex excited vocoder.

Authors:  Tyler H Churchill; Alan Kan; Matthew J Goupell; Antje Ihlefeld; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-22

7.  Concurrent-vowel and tone recognition by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu; Hung-Pin Wu; Chuan-Jen Hsu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Effects of cooperating and conflicting cues on speech intonation recognition by cochlear implant users and normal hearing listeners.

Authors:  Shu-Chen Peng; Nelson Lu; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 1.854

9.  Morphological variation in the adult hard palate and posterior pharyngeal wall.

Authors:  Adam Lammert; Michael Proctor; Shrikanth Narayanan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Discrimination of speaker sex and size when glottal-pulse rate and vocal-tract length are controlled.

Authors:  David R R Smith; Thomas C Walters; Roy D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  20 in total

1.  Voice gender and the segregation of competing talkers: Perceptual learning in cochlear implant simulations.

Authors:  Jessica R Sullivan; Peter F Assmann; Shaikat Hossain; Erin C Schafer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Accommodation of gender-related phonetic differences by listeners with cochlear implants and in a variety of vocoder simulations.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  [Speaker discrimination in cochlear implant users].

Authors:  R Mühler; M Ziese; J L Verhey
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Perceptual weighting of acoustic cues for accommodating gender-related talker differences heard by listeners with normal hearing and with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Ashley N Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Modulation frequency discrimination with single and multiple channels in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Sandy Oba; Deniz Başkent; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Talker identification: Effects of masking, hearing loss, and age.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Christine R Mason; Elin Roverud; Tyler K Perrachione; Gerald Kidd; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Voice Discrimination by Adults with Cochlear Implants: the Benefits of Early Implantation for Vocal-Tract Length Perception.

Authors:  Yael Zaltz; Raymond L Goldsworthy; Liat Kishon-Rabin; Laurie S Eisenberg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-08

8.  Factors Affecting Speech Reception in Background Noise with a Vocoder Implementation of the FAST Algorithm.

Authors:  Shaikat Hossain; Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-09

9.  Fundamental-frequency discrimination using noise-band-vocoded harmonic complexes in older listeners with normal hearing.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Spectral Contrast Effects Reveal Different Acoustic Cues for Vowel Recognition in Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.