Literature DB >> 26428806

Fundamental-frequency discrimination using noise-band-vocoded harmonic complexes in older listeners with normal hearing.

Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac1, Monita Chatterjee1.   

Abstract

Voice-pitch cues provide detailed information about a talker that help a listener to understand speech in complex environments. Temporal-envelope based voice-pitch coding is important for listeners with hearing impairment, especially listeners with cochlear implants, as spectral resolution is not sufficient to provide a spectrally based voice-pitch cue. The effect of aging on the ability to glean voice-pitch information using temporal envelope cues is not completely understood. The current study measured fundamental frequency (f0) discrimination limens in normal-hearing younger and older adults while listening to noise-band vocoded harmonic complexes with varying numbers of spectral channels. Age-related disparities in performance were apparent across all conditions, independent of spectral degradation and/or fundamental frequency. The findings have important implications for older listeners with normal hearing and hearing loss, who may be inherently limited in their ability to perceive f0 cues due to senescent decline in auditory function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26428806      PMCID: PMC4592424          DOI: 10.1121/1.4929938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  35 in total

1.  Age-related alterations in the neural coding of envelope periodicities.

Authors:  Joseph P Walton; Henry Simon; Robert D Frisina
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Shu-Chen Peng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Effect of age on F0 difference limen and concurrent vowel identification.

Authors:  Tara Vongpaisal; Margaret Kathleen Pichora-Fuller
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Modulation rate detection and discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  K W Grant; V Summers; M R Leek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A neural basis of speech-in-noise perception in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Han-Gyol Yi; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Human temporal auditory acuity as assessed by envelope following responses.

Authors:  David W Purcell; Sasha M John; Bruce A Schneider; Terence W Picton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Gender identification in younger and older adults: use of spectral and temporal cues in noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Speech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu; Chao-Gang Wei; Ke-Li Cao
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Distortion products and their influence on representation of pitch-relevant information in the human brainstem for unresolved harmonic complex tones.

Authors:  Christopher J Smalt; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Gavin M Bidelman; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  10 in total

1.  Speech masking release in Hybrid cochlear implant users: Roles of spectral and temporal cues in electric-acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Voice Discrimination by Adults with Cochlear Implants: the Benefits of Early Implantation for Vocal-Tract Length Perception.

Authors:  Yael Zaltz; Raymond L Goldsworthy; Liat Kishon-Rabin; Laurie S Eisenberg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-08

3.  Age-Related Differences in Listening Effort During Degraded Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Kristina M Ward; Jing Shen; Pamela E Souza; Tina M Grieco-Calub
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Age-Related Changes in Voice Emotion Recognition by Postlingually Deafened Listeners With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Shauntelle A Cannon; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

5.  Accuracy and cue use in word segmentation for cochlear-implant listeners and normal-hearing listeners presented vocoded speech.

Authors:  Christopher C Heffner; Brittany N Jaekel; Rochelle S Newman; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

6.  Age-Related Differences in the Processing of Temporal Envelope and Spectral Cues in a Speech Segment.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Casey R Gaskins; Maureen J Shader; Erin P Walter; Samira Anderson; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Spectral-Temporal Modulated Ripple Discrimination by Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Monica Padilla; Amy S Martinez; Laurie S Eisenberg
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Frequency Following Response and Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid.

Authors:  David M Kessler; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Spencer B Smith; Kristen D'Onofrio; René H Gifford
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Age-Related Temporal Processing Deficits in Word Segments in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; Casey R Gaskins; Maureen J Shader; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Samira Anderson; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Difficulties Experienced by Older Listeners in Utilizing Voice Cues for Speaker Discrimination.

Authors:  Yael Zaltz; Liat Kishon-Rabin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.