Literature DB >> 24448721

Speech perception in noise with a harmonic complex excited vocoder.

Tyler H Churchill1, Alan Kan, Matthew J Goupell, Antje Ihlefeld, Ruth Y Litovsky.   

Abstract

A cochlear implant (CI) presents band-pass-filtered acoustic envelope information by modulating current pulse train levels. Similarly, a vocoder presents envelope information by modulating an acoustic carrier. By studying how normal hearing (NH) listeners are able to understand degraded speech signals with a vocoder, the parameters that best simulate electric hearing and factors that might contribute to the NH-CI performance difference may be better understood. A vocoder with harmonic complex carriers (fundamental frequency, f0 = 100 Hz) was used to study the effect of carrier phase dispersion on speech envelopes and intelligibility. The starting phases of the harmonic components were randomly dispersed to varying degrees prior to carrier filtering and modulation. NH listeners were tested on recognition of a closed set of vocoded words in background noise. Two sets of synthesis filters simulated different amounts of current spread in CIs. Results showed that the speech vocoded with carriers whose starting phases were maximally dispersed was the most intelligible. Superior speech understanding may have been a result of the flattening of the dispersed-phase carrier's intrinsic temporal envelopes produced by the large number of interacting components in the high-frequency channels. Cross-correlogram analyses of auditory nerve model simulations confirmed that randomly dispersing the carrier's component starting phases resulted in better neural envelope representation. However, neural metrics extracted from these analyses were not found to accurately predict speech recognition scores for all vocoded speech conditions. It is possible that central speech understanding mechanisms are insensitive to the envelope-fine structure dichotomy exploited by vocoders.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24448721      PMCID: PMC3946138          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-013-0435-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  33 in total

1.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors:  L M Friesen; R V Shannon; D Baskent; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel; Richard S Tyler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Interaural time sensitivity dominated by cochlea-induced envelope patterns.

Authors:  Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-16       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Temporal properties of responses to broadband noise in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Dries H G Louage; Marcel van der Heijden; Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Simulations of cochlear implant hearing using filtered harmonic complexes: implications for concurrent sound segregation.

Authors:  John M Deeks; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The role of spectral and temporal cues in voice gender discrimination by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; Sherol Chinchilla; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05-20

7.  On the balance of envelope and temporal fine structure in the encoding of speech in the early auditory system.

Authors:  Shihab Shamma; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Physiological considerations in artificial stimulation of the inner ear.

Authors:  N Y Kiang; E C Moxon
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform.

Authors:  G A Studebaker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

10.  Representation of steady-state vowels in the temporal aspects of the discharge patterns of populations of auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  E D Young; M B Sachs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  3 in total

1.  Binaural sensitivity in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Erica Ehlers; Matthew J Goupell; Yi Zheng; Shelly P Godar; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Gender categorization is abnormal in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Christina D Fuller; Etienne Gaudrain; Jeanne N Clarke; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Rolien H Free; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-30

3.  Acoustic richness modulates the neural networks supporting intelligible speech processing.

Authors:  Yune-Sang Lee; Nam Eun Min; Arthur Wingfield; Murray Grossman; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.208

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.