Literature DB >> 18247770

Discrimination of speaker sex and size when glottal-pulse rate and vocal-tract length are controlled.

David R R Smith1, Thomas C Walters, Roy D Patterson.   

Abstract

A recent study [Smith and Patterson, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 3177-3186 (2005)] demonstrated that both the glottal-pulse rate (GPR) and the vocal-tract length (VTL) of vowel sounds have a large effect on the perceived sex and age (or size) of a speaker. The vowels for all of the "different" speakers in that study were synthesized from recordings of the sustained vowels of one, adult male speaker. This paper presents a follow-up study in which a range of vowels were synthesized from recordings of four different speakers--an adult man, an adult woman, a young boy, and a young girl--to determine whether the sex and age of the original speaker would have an effect upon listeners' judgments of whether a vowel was spoken by a man, woman, boy, or girl, after they were equated for GPR and VTL. The sustained vowels of the four speakers were scaled to produce the same combinations of GPR and VTL, which covered the entire range normally encountered in every day life. The results show that listeners readily distinguish children from adults based on their sustained vowels but that they struggle to distinguish the sex of the speaker.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18247770      PMCID: PMC2346563          DOI: 10.1121/1.2799507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Acoustic correlates of talker sex and individual talker identity are present in a short vowel segment produced in running speech.

Authors:  J A Bachorowski; M J Owren
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length changes on attention to one of two simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  Christopher J Darwin; Douglas S Brungart; Brian D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Gender recognition from speech. Part II: Fine analysis.

Authors:  D G Childers; K Wu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Gender recognition from speech. Part I: Coarse analysis.

Authors:  K Wu; D G Childers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Identification of the speaker's sex from voiceless fricatives.

Authors:  F Ingemann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels.

Authors:  J Hillenbrand; L A Getty; M J Clark; K Wheeler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Longitudinal research on adolescent voice change in males.

Authors:  H Hollien; R Green; K Massey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The interaction of glottal-pulse rate and vocal-tract length in judgements of speaker size, sex, and age.

Authors:  David R R Smith; Roy D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Discrimination of speaker size from syllable phrases.

Authors:  D Timothy Ives; David R R Smith; Roy D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The processing and perception of size information in speech sounds.

Authors:  David R R Smith; Roy D Patterson; Richard Turner; Hideki Kawahara; Toshio Irino
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  8 in total

1.  Identification of speaker sex from one vowel across a range of fundamental frequencies.

Authors:  Douglas N Honorof; D H Whalen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Gender categorization is abnormal in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Christina D Fuller; Etienne Gaudrain; Jeanne N Clarke; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Rolien H Free; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-30

3.  Voice Discrimination by Adults with Cochlear Implants: the Benefits of Early Implantation for Vocal-Tract Length Perception.

Authors:  Yael Zaltz; Raymond L Goldsworthy; Liat Kishon-Rabin; Laurie S Eisenberg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-08

4.  Stimulation Rate and Voice Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Damir Kovačić; Chris J James
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-02

5.  Preferences for very low and very high voice pitch in humans.

Authors:  Daniel E Re; Jillian J M O'Connor; Patrick J Bennett; David R Feinberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Children With Normal Hearing Are Efficient Users of Fundamental Frequency and Vocal Tract Length Cues for Voice Discrimination.

Authors:  Yael Zaltz; Raymond L Goldsworthy; Laurie S Eisenberg; Liat Kishon-Rabin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

7.  Difficulties Experienced by Older Listeners in Utilizing Voice Cues for Speaker Discrimination.

Authors:  Yael Zaltz; Liat Kishon-Rabin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-03

8.  Development of voice perception is dissociated across gender cues in school-age children.

Authors:  Leanne Nagels; Etienne Gaudrain; Deborah Vickers; Petra Hendriks; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.