Literature DB >> 32873011

Perceptual weighting of acoustic cues for accommodating gender-related talker differences heard by listeners with normal hearing and with cochlear implants.

Matthew B Winn1, Ashley N Moore2.   

Abstract

Listeners must accommodate acoustic differences between vocal tracts and speaking styles of conversation partners-a process called normalization or accommodation. This study explores what acoustic cues are used to make this perceptual adjustment by listeners with normal hearing or with cochlear implants, when the acoustic variability is related to the talker's gender. A continuum between /ʃ/ and /s/ was paired with naturally spoken vocalic contexts that were parametrically manipulated to vary by numerous cues for talker gender including fundamental frequency (F0), vocal tract length (formant spacing), and direct spectral contrast with the fricative. The goal was to examine relative contributions of these cues toward the tendency to have a lower-frequency acoustic boundary for fricatives spoken by men (found in numerous previous studies). Normal hearing listeners relied primarily on formant spacing and much less on F0. The CI listeners were individually variable, with the F0 cue emerging as the strongest cue on average.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32873011      PMCID: PMC7402726          DOI: 10.1121/10.0001672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  45 in total

1.  Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives.

Authors:  A Jongman; R Wayland; S Wong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Youri Maryn; Nelson Roy; Marc De Bodt; Paul Van Cauwenberge; Paul Corthals
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Acoustic parameters in speaker height and weight identification: sex-specific behaviour.

Authors:  W A van Dommelen; B H Moxness
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1995 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.500

4.  Accommodation of gender-related phonetic differences by listeners with cochlear implants and in a variety of vocoder simulations.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  An investigation of the systematic use of spectral information in the determination of apparent-talker height.

Authors:  Santiago Barreda
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Allard Jongman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Charles C Finley; Jill B Firszt; Timothy A Holden; Christine Brenner; Lisa G Potts; Brenda D Gotter; Sallie S Vanderhoof; Karen Mispagel; Gitry Heydebrand; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  The use of auditory and visual context in speech perception by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Ariane E Rhone; Monita Chatterjee; William J Idsardi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-05

9.  Discrimination of Voice Pitch and Vocal-Tract Length in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Etienne Gaudrain; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Acoustic-phonetic and auditory mechanisms of adaptation in the perception of sibilant fricatives.

Authors:  Eleanor Chodroff; Colin Wilson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.