Literature DB >> 29495693

Talker identification: Effects of masking, hearing loss, and age.

Virginia Best1, Jayne B Ahlstrom2, Christine R Mason1, Elin Roverud1, Tyler K Perrachione1, Gerald Kidd1, Judy R Dubno2.   

Abstract

The ability to identify who is talking is an important aspect of communication in social situations and, while empirical data are limited, it is possible that a disruption to this ability contributes to the difficulties experienced by listeners with hearing loss. In this study, talker identification was examined under both quiet and masked conditions. Subjects were grouped by hearing status (normal hearing/sensorineural hearing loss) and age (younger/older adults). Listeners first learned to identify the voices of four same-sex talkers in quiet, and then talker identification was assessed (1) in quiet, (2) in speech-shaped, steady-state noise, and (3) in the presence of a single, unfamiliar same-sex talker. Both younger and older adults with hearing loss, as well as older adults with normal hearing, generally performed more poorly than younger adults with normal hearing, although large individual differences were observed in all conditions. Regression analyses indicated that both age and hearing loss were predictors of performance in quiet, and there was some evidence for an additional contribution of hearing loss in the presence of masking. These findings suggest that both hearing loss and age may affect the ability to identify talkers in "cocktail party" situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29495693      PMCID: PMC5820061          DOI: 10.1121/1.5024333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  30 in total

1.  The role of sequential stream segregation and frequency selectivity in the perception of simultaneous sentences by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  C L Mackersie; T L Prida; D Stiles
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Lexical and indexical cues in masking by competing speech.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Talker-specific learning in speech perception.

Authors:  L C Nygaard; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-04

4.  Effects of masker type, sentence context, and listener age on speech recognition performance in 1-back listening tasks.

Authors:  Jaclyn Schurman; Douglas Brungart; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Human recognition of familiar voices.

Authors:  Stanley J Wenndt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform.

Authors:  G A Studebaker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

7.  Adult age differences in memory for sex of voice.

Authors:  D H Kausler; J M Puckett
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1981-01

8.  Enhancing perceptual learning by combining practice with periods of additional sensory stimulation.

Authors:  Beverly A Wright; Andrew T Sabin; Yuxuan Zhang; Nicole Marrone; Matthew B Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Gender identification in younger and older adults: use of spectral and temporal cues in noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Speaker perception.

Authors:  Stefan R Schweinberger; Hideki Kawahara; Adrian P Simpson; Verena G Skuk; Romi Zäske
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-10-24
View more
  11 in total

1.  A test of model classes accounting for individual differences in the cocktail-party effect.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Briana Rodriguez; Jungmee Lee; Torben Pastore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Word Identification With Temporally Interleaved Competing Sounds by Younger and Older Adult Listeners.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Sarah F Poissant; Gabrielle R Merchant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Implicit and explicit learning in talker identification.

Authors:  Jayden J Lee; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 2.157

4.  Additivity of segregation cues in simulated cocktail-party listening.

Authors:  Briana Rodriguez; Jungmee Lee; Robert Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Best Practices and Advice for Using Pupillometry to Measure Listening Effort: An Introduction for Those Who Want to Get Started.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Dorothea Wendt; Thomas Koelewijn; Stefanie E Kuchinsky
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Assessing the benefit of acoustic beamforming for listeners with aphasia using modified psychoacoustic methods.

Authors:  Sarah Villard; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of Adaptive Non-linear Frequency Compression in Hearing Aids on Mandarin Speech and Sound-Quality Perception.

Authors:  Shuang Qi; Xueqing Chen; Jing Yang; Xianhui Wang; Xin Tian; Hsuanyun Huang; Julia Rehmann; Volker Kuehnel; Jingjing Guan; Li Xu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  The Listener Effect in Multitalker Speech Segregation and Talker Identification.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Briana Rodriguez; Jungmee Lee
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Effects of Spatial Speech Presentation on Listener Response Strategy for Talker-Identification.

Authors:  Stefan Uhrig; Andrew Perkis; Sebastian Möller; U Peter Svensson; Dawn M Behne
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Contributions of Voice Expectations to Talker Selection in Younger and Older Adults With Normal Hearing.

Authors:  William J Bologna; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.