Literature DB >> 25170780

Effect of minimal/mild hearing loss on children's speech understanding in a simulated classroom.

Dawna E Lewis1, Daniel L Valente, Jody L Spalding.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: While classroom acoustics can affect educational performance for all students, the impact for children with minimal/mild hearing loss (MMHL) may be greater than for children with normal hearing (NH). The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of MMHL on children's speech recognition comprehension and looking behavior in a simulated classroom environment. It was hypothesized that children with MMHL would perform similarly to their peers with NH on the speech recognition task but would perform more poorly on the comprehension task. Children with MMHL also were expected to look toward talkers more often than children with NH.
DESIGN: Eighteen children with MMHL and 18 age-matched children with NH participated. In a simulated classroom environment, children listened to lines from an elementary-age-appropriate play read by a teacher and four students reproduced over LCD monitors and loudspeakers located around the listener. A gyroscopic headtracking device was used to monitor looking behavior during the task. At the end of the play, comprehension was assessed by asking a series of 18 factual questions. Children also were asked to repeat 50 meaningful sentences with three key words each presented audio-only by a single talker either from the loudspeaker at 0 degree azimuth or randomly from the five loudspeakers.
RESULTS: Both children with NH and those with MMHL performed at or near ceiling on the sentence recognition task. For the comprehension task, children with MMHL performed more poorly than those with NH. Assessment of looking behavior indicated that both groups of children looked at talkers while they were speaking less than 50% of the time. In addition, the pattern of overall looking behaviors suggested that, compared with older children with NH, a larger portion of older children with MMHL may demonstrate looking behaviors similar to younger children with or without MMHL.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that, under realistic acoustic conditions, it is difficult to differentiate performance among children with MMHL and children with NH using a sentence recognition task. The more cognitively demanding comprehension task identified performance differences between these two groups. The comprehension task represented a condition in which the persons talking change rapidly and are not readily visible to the listener. Examination of looking behavior suggested that, in this complex task, attempting to visualize the talker may inefficiently utilize cognitive resources that would otherwise be allocated for comprehension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25170780      PMCID: PMC4272681          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  44 in total

Review 1.  Revisiting speech interference in classrooms.

Authors:  M Picard; J S Bradley
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

2.  Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss.

Authors:  Candace Bourland Hick; Anne Marie Tharpe
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Experimental investigation of the effects of the acoustical conditions in a simulated classroom on speech recognition and learning in children.

Authors:  Daniel L Valente; Hallie M Plevinsky; John M Franco; Elizabeth C Heinrichs-Graham; Dawna E Lewis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  On the perception of speech in primary school classrooms: ranking of noise interference and of age influence.

Authors:  Nicola Prodi; Chiara Visentin; Alice Feletti
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of reverberation on speech recognition in stationary and modulated noise by school-aged children and young adults.

Authors:  Marcin Wróblewski; Dawna E Lewis; Daniel L Valente; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Children's phoneme identification in reverberation and noise.

Authors:  C E Johnson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Children's perception of speech in multitalker babble.

Authors:  M Fallon; S E Trehub; B A Schneider
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The effects of limited bandwidth and noise on verbal processing time and word recall in normal-hearing children.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Effect of minimal hearing loss on children's ability to multitask in quiet and in noise.

Authors:  Brittany McFadden; Andrea Pittman
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Children's use of semantic cues in degraded listening environments.

Authors:  Marianne Fallon; Sandra E Trehub; Bruce A Schneider
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  22 in total

1.  Effects of Self-Generated Noise on Estimates of Detection Threshold in Quiet for School-Age Children and Adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Heather L Porter; Lori J Leibold; John H Grose; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Salivary Cortisol Profiles of Children with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Fred H Bess; Samantha J Gustafson; Blythe A Corbett; E Warren Lambert; Stephen M Camarata; Benjamin W Y Hornsby
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Effects of Looking Behavior on Listening and Understanding in a Simulated Classroom.

Authors:  Dawna E Lewis; Shannon Wannagot
Journal:  J Educ Audiol       Date:  2014-01-01

4.  Remote Microphone System Use at Home: Impact on Child-Directed Speech.

Authors:  Carlos R Benítez-Barrera; Emily C Thompson; Gina P Angley; Tiffany Woynaroski; Anne Marie Tharpe
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Evaluation of the NAL Dynamic Conversations Test in older listeners with hearing loss.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Gitte Keidser; Katrina Freeston; Jörg M Buchholz
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Looking Behavior and Audiovisual Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing and Children With Mild Bilateral or Unilateral Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Dawna E Lewis; Nicholas A Smith; Jody L Spalding; Daniel L Valente
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Speech-in-Noise and Quality-of-Life Measures in School-Aged Children With Normal Hearing and With Unilateral Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Amanda M Griffin; Sarah F Poissant; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Voice Emotion Recognition by Children With Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Shauntelle A Cannon; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  The Influence of Hearing Aid Use on Outcomes of Children With Mild Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Walker; Lenore Holte; Ryan W McCreery; Meredith Spratford; Thomas Page; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Speech Recognition and Parent Ratings From Auditory Development Questionnaires in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Elizabeth A Walker; Meredith Spratford; Jacob Oleson; Ruth Bentler; Lenore Holte; Patricia Roush
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.