Literature DB >> 28826285

Evaluation of the NAL Dynamic Conversations Test in older listeners with hearing loss.

Virginia Best1, Gitte Keidser2, Katrina Freeston2, Jörg M Buchholz2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The National Acoustic Laboratories Dynamic Conversations Test (NAL-DCT) is a new test of speech comprehension that incorporates a realistic environment and dynamic speech materials that capture certain features of everyday conversations. The goal of this study was to assess the suitability of the test for studying the consequences of hearing loss and amplification in older listeners.
DESIGN: Unaided and aided comprehension scores were measured for single-, two- and three-talker passages, along with unaided and aided sentence recall. To characterise the relevant cognitive abilities of the group, measures of short-term working memory, verbal information-processing speed and reading comprehension speed were collected. STUDY SAMPLE: Participants were 41 older listeners with varying degrees of hearing loss.
RESULTS: Performance on both the NAL-DCT and the sentence test was strongly driven by hearing loss, but performance on the NAL-DCT was additionally related to a composite cognitive deficit score. Benefits of amplification were measurable but influenced by individual test SNRs.
CONCLUSIONS: The NAL-DCT is sensitive to the same factors as a traditional sentence recall test, but in addition is sensitive to the cognitive factors required for speech processing. The test shows promise as a tool for research concerned with real-world listening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Speech comprehension; hearing aids; hearing loss; realistic tests

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28826285      PMCID: PMC6114171          DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1365275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  26 in total

1.  Experimental investigation of the effects of the acoustical conditions in a simulated classroom on speech recognition and learning in children.

Authors:  Daniel L Valente; Hallie M Plevinsky; John M Franco; Elizabeth C Heinrichs-Graham; Dawna E Lewis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Evaluating the effort expended to understand speech in noise using a dual-task paradigm: the effects of providing visual speech cues.

Authors:  Sarah Fraser; Jean-Pierre Gagné; Majolaine Alepins; Pascale Dubois
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Long-term signal-to-noise ratio at the input and output of amplitude-compression systems.

Authors:  Graham Naylor; René Burmand Johannesson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Theoretical Issues of Validity in the Measurement of Aided Speech Reception Threshold in Noise for Comparing Nonlinear Hearing Aid Systems.

Authors:  Graham Naylor
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  A Dynamic Speech Comprehension Test for Assessing Real-World Listening Ability.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Gitte Keidser; Katrina Freeston; Jörg M Buchholz
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  An evaluation of the performance of two binaural beamformers in complex and dynamic multitalker environments.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Jorge Mejia; Katrina Freeston; Richard J van Hoesel; Harvey Dillon
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Evaluation of a cognitive test battery in young and elderly normal-hearing and hearing-impaired persons.

Authors:  M Hällgren; B Larsby; B Lyxell; S Arlinger
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Monaural versus binaural hearing: ease of listening, word recognition, and attentional effort.

Authors:  J F Feuerstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Effect of minimal/mild hearing loss on children's speech understanding in a simulated classroom.

Authors:  Dawna E Lewis; Daniel L Valente; Jody L Spalding
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Listening effort and fatigue: what exactly are we measuring? A British Society of Audiology Cognition in Hearing Special Interest Group 'white paper'.

Authors:  Ronan McGarrigle; Kevin J Munro; Piers Dawes; Andrew J Stewart; David R Moore; Johanna G Barry; Sygal Amitay
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  4 in total

1.  Recognition of foreign-accented speech in noise: The interplay between talker intelligibility and linguistic structure.

Authors:  Dorina Strori; Ann R Bradlow; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Animal-to-Human Translation Difficulties and Problems With Proposed Coding-in-Noise Deficits in Noise-Induced Synaptopathy and Hidden Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Sara Ripley; Li Xia; Zhen Zhang; Steve J Aiken; Jian Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 5.152

Review 3.  Listening-Based Communication Ability in Adults With Hearing Loss: A Scoping Review of Existing Measures.

Authors:  Katie Neal; Catherine M McMahon; Sarah E Hughes; Isabelle Boisvert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-10

4.  The Concurrent OLSA Test: A Method for Speech Recognition in Multi-talker Situations at Fixed SNR.

Authors:  Jan Heeren; Theresa Nuesse; Matthias Latzel; Inga Holube; Volker Hohmann; Kirsten C Wagener; Michael Schulte
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.