Literature DB >> 22280587

Experimental investigation of the effects of the acoustical conditions in a simulated classroom on speech recognition and learning in children.

Daniel L Valente1, Hallie M Plevinsky, John M Franco, Elizabeth C Heinrichs-Graham, Dawna E Lewis.   

Abstract

The potential effects of acoustical environment on speech understanding are especially important as children enter school where students' ability to hear and understand complex verbal information is critical to learning. However, this ability is compromised because of widely varied and unfavorable classroom acoustics. The extent to which unfavorable classroom acoustics affect children's performance on longer learning tasks is largely unknown as most research has focused on testing children using words, syllables, or sentences as stimuli. In the current study, a simulated classroom environment was used to measure comprehension performance of two classroom learning activities: a discussion and lecture. Comprehension performance was measured for groups of elementary-aged students in one of four environments with varied reverberation times and background noise levels. The reverberation time was either 0.6 or 1.5 s, and the signal-to-noise level was either +10 or +7 dB. Performance is compared to adult subjects as well as to sentence-recognition in the same condition. Significant differences were seen in comprehension scores as a function of age and condition; both increasing background noise and reverberation degraded performance in comprehension tasks compared to minimal differences in measures of sentence-recognition.
© 2012 Acoustical Society of America.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22280587      PMCID: PMC3283898          DOI: 10.1121/1.3662059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  31 in total

1.  Spondee recognition in a two-talker masker and a speech-shaped noise masker in adults and children.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; John H Grose; Emily Buss; Madhu B Dev
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Effect of noise and occupancy on optimal reverberation times for speech intelligibility in classrooms.

Authors:  Murray Hodgson; Eva-Marie Nosal
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  On the importance of early reflections for speech in rooms.

Authors:  J S Bradley; H Sato; M Picard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speech intelligibility of young school-aged children in the presence of real-life classroom noise.

Authors:  Donald G Jamieson; Garry Kranjc; Karen Yu; William E Hodgetts
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Reception of consonants in a classroom as affected by monaural and binaural listening, noise, reverberation, and hearing aids.

Authors:  A K Nábĕlek; J M Pickett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Room acoustics effects on monosyllabic word discrimination ability for normal and hearing-impaired children.

Authors:  T Finitzo-Hieber; T W Tillman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1978-09

7.  Performance of children aged 9 to 17 years on a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence material with controlled word predictability.

Authors:  L L Elliott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Auditory-visual perception of speech.

Authors:  N P Erber
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1975-11

9.  The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children.

Authors:  J Bench; A Kowal; J Bamford
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1979-08

10.  Background noise levels and reverberation times in unoccupied classrooms: predictions and measurements.

Authors:  Heather A Knecht; Peggy B Nelson; Gail M Whitelaw; Lawrence L Feth
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.493

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Remote Microphone Technology for Children with Hearing Loss or Auditory Processing Issues.

Authors:  Erin C Schafer; Benjamin Kirby; Sharon Miller
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2020-12-16

2.  Effects of Looking Behavior on Listening and Understanding in a Simulated Classroom.

Authors:  Dawna E Lewis; Shannon Wannagot
Journal:  J Educ Audiol       Date:  2014-01-01

3.  Evaluation of the NAL Dynamic Conversations Test in older listeners with hearing loss.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Gitte Keidser; Katrina Freeston; Jörg M Buchholz
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Improving speech-in-noise recognition for children with hearing loss: potential effects of language abilities, binaural summation, and head shadow.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; Eric Tarr; Joanna H Lowenstein; Caitlin Rice; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  The Effects of Noise and Reverberation on Listening Effort in Adults With Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Julia Gordon; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Applying Virtual Reality to Audiovisual Speech Perception Tasks in Children.

Authors:  Maeve Salanger; Dawna Lewis; Timothy Vallier; Tessa McDermott; Andrew Dergan
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 1.493

7.  Auditory Comprehension in School-Aged Children With Normal Hearing and With Unilateral Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Amanda M Griffin; Sarah F Poissant; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Effect of minimal/mild hearing loss on children's speech understanding in a simulated classroom.

Authors:  Dawna E Lewis; Daniel L Valente; Jody L Spalding
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Children's understanding of instructions presented in noise and reverberation.

Authors:  Dawna E Lewis; Crystal M Manninen; Daniel L Valente; Nicholas A Smith
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.493

10.  Rerouting Hearing Aid Systems for Overcoming Simulated Unilateral Hearing in Dynamic Listening Situations.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Dawna Lewis; Gina Angley; Anne Marie Tharpe
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.