Literature DB >> 12069009

Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss.

Candace Bourland Hick1, Anne Marie Tharpe.   

Abstract

Parents, audiologists, and educators have long speculated that children with hearing loss must expend more effort and, therefore, fatigue more easily than their peers with normal hearing when listening in adverse acoustic conditions. Until now, however, very few studies have been conducted to substantiate these speculations. Two experiments were conducted with school-age children with mild-to-moderate hearing loss and with normal hearing. In the first experiment, salivary cortisol levels and a self-rating measure were used to measure fatigue. Neither cortisol measurements nor self-rated measures of fatigue revealed significant differences between children with hearing loss and their normal-hearing peers. In the second experiment, however, a dual-task paradigm used to study listening effort indicated that children with hearing loss expend more effort in listening than children with normal hearing. Results are discussed in terms of clinical application and future research needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12069009     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/046)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  92 in total

1.  The hidden effect of hearing acuity on speech recall, and compensatory effects of self-paced listening.

Authors:  Tepring Piquado; Jonathan I Benichov; Hiram Brownell; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Psychometric Functions of Dual-Task Paradigms for Measuring Listening Effort.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Elizabeth Stangl; Xuyang Zhang; Joanna Perkins; Emily Eilers
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Salivary Cortisol Profiles of Children with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Fred H Bess; Samantha J Gustafson; Blythe A Corbett; E Warren Lambert; Stephen M Camarata; Benjamin W Y Hornsby
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 4.  Unilateral and mild bilateral hearing loss in children: past and current perspectives.

Authors:  Anne Marie Tharpe
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-03

5.  Perceived listening effort for a tonal task with contralateral competing signals.

Authors:  William J Bologna; Monita Chatterjee; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  A Taxonomy of Fatigue Concepts and Their Relation to Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Graham Naylor; Fred H Bess
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Listening Effort in Younger and Older Adults: A Comparison of Auditory-Only and Auditory-Visual Presentations.

Authors:  Mitchell S Sommers; Damian Phelps
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Voice Emotion Recognition by Children With Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Shauntelle A Cannon; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Influence of hearing loss on children's identification of spondee words in a speech-shaped noise or a two-talker masker.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Andrea Hillock-Dunn; Nicole Duncan; Patricia A Roush; Emily Buss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Listening Effort Measured in Adults with Normal Hearing and Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ann E Perreau; Yu-Hsiang Wu; Bailey Tatge; Diana Irwin; Daniel Corts
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.