Literature DB >> 26478719

Effects of Looking Behavior on Listening and Understanding in a Simulated Classroom.

Dawna E Lewis1, Shannon Wannagot2.   

Abstract

Audiovisual cues can improve speech perception in adverse acoustical environments when compared to auditory cues alone. In classrooms, where acoustics often are less than ideal, the availability of visual cues has the potential to benefit children during learning activities. The current study evaluated the effects of looking behavior on speech understanding of children (8-11 years) and adults during comprehension and sentence repetition tasks in a simulated classroom environment. For the comprehension task, results revealed an effect of looking behavior (looking required versus looking not required) for older children and adults only. Within the looking-behavior conditions, age effects also were evident. There was no effect of looking behavior for the sentence-repetition task (looking versus no looking) but an age effect also was found. The current findings suggest that looking behavior may impact speech understanding differently depending on the task and the age of the listener. In classrooms, these potential differences should be taken into account when designing learning tasks.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 26478719      PMCID: PMC4607086     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Educ Audiol        ISSN: 1526-6095


  33 in total

Review 1.  Revisiting speech interference in classrooms.

Authors:  M Picard; J S Bradley
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

2.  Bisensory augmentation: a speechreading advantage when speech is clearly audible and intact.

Authors:  P Arnold; F Hill
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2001-05

3.  Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss.

Authors:  Candace Bourland Hick; Anne Marie Tharpe
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Hearing lips and seeing voices.

Authors:  H McGurk; J MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Speech intelligibility of young school-aged children in the presence of real-life classroom noise.

Authors:  Donald G Jamieson; Garry Kranjc; Karen Yu; William E Hodgetts
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Do you see what I am saying? Exploring visual enhancement of speech comprehension in noisy environments.

Authors:  Lars A Ross; Dave Saint-Amour; Victoria M Leavitt; Daniel C Javitt; John J Foxe
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Informational masking of speech in children: auditory-visual integration.

Authors:  Frederic Wightman; Doris Kistler; Douglas Brungart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Children's phoneme identification in reverberation and noise.

Authors:  C E Johnson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Cognitive performance and perceived effort in speech processing tasks: effects of different noise backgrounds in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

Authors:  Birgitta Larsby; Mathias Hällgren; Björn Lyxell; Stig Arlinger
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Is the integration of heard and seen speech mandatory for infants?

Authors:  Renée N Desjardins; Janet F Werker
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.038

View more
  1 in total

1.  Rerouting Hearing Aid Systems for Overcoming Simulated Unilateral Hearing in Dynamic Listening Situations.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Dawna Lewis; Gina Angley; Anne Marie Tharpe
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.