Literature DB >> 26731160

Speech Recognition and Parent Ratings From Auditory Development Questionnaires in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.

Ryan W McCreery1, Elizabeth A Walker, Meredith Spratford, Jacob Oleson, Ruth Bentler, Lenore Holte, Patricia Roush.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Progress has been made in recent years in the provision of amplification and early intervention for children who are hard of hearing. However, children who use hearing aids (HAs) may have inconsistent access to their auditory environment due to limitations in speech audibility through their HAs or limited HA use. The effects of variability in children's auditory experience on parent-reported auditory skills questionnaires and on speech recognition in quiet and in noise were examined for a large group of children who were followed as part of the Outcomes of Children with Hearing Loss study.
DESIGN: Parent ratings on auditory development questionnaires and children's speech recognition were assessed for 306 children who are hard of hearing. Children ranged in age from 12 months to 9 years. Three questionnaires involving parent ratings of auditory skill development and behavior were used, including the LittlEARS Auditory Questionnaire, Parents Evaluation of Oral/Aural Performance in Children rating scale, and an adaptation of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing scale. Speech recognition in quiet was assessed using the Open- and Closed-Set Test, Early Speech Perception test, Lexical Neighborhood Test, and Phonetically Balanced Kindergarten word lists. Speech recognition in noise was assessed using the Computer-Assisted Speech Perception Assessment. Children who are hard of hearing were compared with peers with normal hearing matched for age, maternal educational level, and nonverbal intelligence. The effects of aided audibility, HA use, and language ability on parent responses to auditory development questionnaires and on children's speech recognition were also examined.
RESULTS: Children who are hard of hearing had poorer performance than peers with normal hearing on parent ratings of auditory skills and had poorer speech recognition. Significant individual variability among children who are hard of hearing was observed. Children with greater aided audibility through their HAs, more hours of HA use, and better language abilities generally had higher parent ratings of auditory skills and better speech-recognition abilities in quiet and in noise than peers with less audibility, more limited HA use, or poorer language abilities. In addition to the auditory and language factors that were predictive for speech recognition in quiet, phonological working memory was also a positive predictor for word recognition abilities in noise.
CONCLUSIONS: Children who are hard of hearing continue to experience delays in auditory skill development and speech-recognition abilities compared with peers with normal hearing. However, significant improvements in these domains have occurred in comparison to similar data reported before the adoption of universal newborn hearing screening and early intervention programs for children who are hard of hearing. Increasing the audibility of speech has a direct positive effect on auditory skill development and speech-recognition abilities and also may enhance these skills by improving language abilities in children who are hard of hearing. Greater number of hours of HA use also had a significant positive impact on parent ratings of auditory skills and children's speech recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26731160      PMCID: PMC4703361          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  51 in total

1.  Audibility and speech perception of children using wide dynamic range compression hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.493

2.  Lexical effects on spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  K I Kirk; D B Pisoni; M J Osberger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  The Parents' Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children (PEACH) scale: normative data.

Authors:  Teresa Y C Ching; Mandy Hill
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Longitudinal changes in real-ear to coupler difference measurements in infants.

Authors:  Kristina Bingham; Lorienne M Jenstad; Navid Shahnaz
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Validation of the LittlEARS((R)) Auditory Questionnaire in children with normal hearing.

Authors:  F Coninx; V Weichbold; L Tsiakpini; E Autrique; G Bescond; L Tamas; A Compernol; M Georgescu; I Koroleva; G Le Maner-Idrissi; W Liang; J Madell; B Mikić; A Obrycka; A Pankowska; A Pascu; R Popescu; L Radulescu; T Rauhamäki; P Rouev; Z Kabatova; J Spitzer; Ch Thodi; F Varzic; M Vischer; L Wang; J S Zavala; J Brachmaier
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 1.675

6.  Effect of minimal/mild hearing loss on children's speech understanding in a simulated classroom.

Authors:  Dawna E Lewis; Daniel L Valente; Jody L Spalding
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Relationships between speech perception abilities and spoken language skills in young children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Jean L Desjardin; Sophie E Ambrose; Amy S Martinez; Laurie S Eisenberg
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Tracking development of speech recognition: longitudinal data from hierarchical assessments in the Childhood Development after Cochlear Implantation Study.

Authors:  Nae-Yuh Wang; Laurie S Eisenberg; Karen C Johnson; Nancy E Fink; Emily A Tobey; Alexandra L Quittner; John K Niparko
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Karyn Louise Galvin; Mansze Mok; Richard C Dowell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Consistency of hearing aid use in infants with early-identified hearing loss.

Authors:  Mary Pat Moeller; Brenda Hoover; Barbara Peterson; Pat Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 1.493

View more
  36 in total

1.  Effect of Context and Hearing Loss on Time-Gated Word Recognition in Children.

Authors:  Dawna Lewis; Judy Kopun; Ryan McCreery; Marc Brennan; Kanae Nishi; Evan Cordrey; Pat Stelmachowicz; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Masking Release for Speech-in-Speech Recognition Due to a Target/Masker Sex Mismatch in Children With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Jenna M Browning; Emily Buss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Medical Referral Patterns and Etiologies for Children With Mild-to-Severe Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Paul D Judge; Erik Jorgensen; Monica Lopez-Vazquez; Patricia Roush; Thomas A Page; Mary Pat Moeller; J Bruce Tomblin; Lenore Holte; Craig Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Vocabulary Facilitates Speech Perception in Children With Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Kelsey E Klein; Elizabeth A Walker; Benjamin Kirby; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Individual differences in language and working memory affect children's speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Meredith Spratford; Benjamin Kirby; Marc Brennan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Remote Microphone System Use at Home: Impact on Child-Directed Speech.

Authors:  Carlos R Benítez-Barrera; Emily C Thompson; Gina P Angley; Tiffany Woynaroski; Anne Marie Tharpe
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  False Belief Development in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing Compared With Peers With Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Walker; Sophie E Ambrose; Jacob Oleson; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Longitudinal Predictors of Aided Speech Audibility in Infants and Children.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Elizabeth A Walker; Meredith Spratford; Ruth Bentler; Lenore Holte; Patricia Roush; Jacob Oleson; John Van Buren; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Epilogue: Conclusions and Implications for Research and Practice.

Authors:  Mary Pat Moeller; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 10.  An Introduction to the Outcomes of Children with Hearing Loss Study.

Authors:  Mary Pat Moeller; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.