Literature DB >> 23446226

The effects of limited bandwidth and noise on verbal processing time and word recall in normal-hearing children.

Ryan W McCreery1, Patricia G Stelmachowicz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Understanding speech in acoustically degraded environments can place significant cognitive demands on school-age children who are developing the cognitive and linguistic skills needed to support this process. Previous studies suggest the speech understanding, word learning, and academic performance can be negatively impacted by background noise, but the effect of limited audibility on cognitive processes in children has not been directly studied. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of limited audibility on speech understanding and working memory tasks in school-age children with normal hearing.
DESIGN: Seventeen children with normal hearing between 6 and 12 years of age participated in the present study. Repetition of nonword consonant-vowel-consonant stimuli was measured under conditions with combinations of two different signal to noise ratios (SNRs; 3 and 9 dB) and two low-pass filter settings (3.2 and 5.6 kHz). Verbal processing time was calculated based on the time from the onset of the stimulus to the onset of the child's response. Monosyllabic word repetition and recall were also measured in conditions with a full bandwidth and 5.6 kHz low-pass cutoff.
RESULTS: Nonword repetition scores decreased as audibility decreased. Verbal processing time increased as audibility decreased, consistent with predictions based on increased listening effort. Although monosyllabic word repetition did not vary between the full bandwidth and 5.6 kHz low-pass filter condition, recall was significantly poorer in the condition with limited bandwidth (low pass at 5.6 kHz). Age and expressive language scores predicted performance on word recall tasks, but did not predict nonword repetition accuracy or verbal processing time.
CONCLUSIONS: Decreased audibility was associated with reduced accuracy for nonword repetition and increased verbal processing time in children with normal hearing. Deficits in free recall were observed even under conditions where word repetition was not affected. The negative effects of reduced audibility may occur even under conditions where speech repetition is not impacted. Limited stimulus audibility may result in greater cognitive effort for verbal rehearsal in working memory and may limit the availability of cognitive resources to allocate to working memory and other processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23446226      PMCID: PMC3681878          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828576e2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  31 in total

1.  Speech recognition with reduced spectral cues as a function of age.

Authors:  L S Eisenberg; R V Shannon; A S Martinez; J Wygonski; A Boothroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Sublexical or lexical effects on serial recall of nonwords?

Authors:  Steven Roodenrys; Melinda Hinton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss.

Authors:  Candace Bourland Hick; Anne Marie Tharpe
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  An online calculator to compute phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on the basis of child corpora of spoken American English.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Jill R Hoover
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-05

5.  Impact of auditory selective attention on verbal short-term memory and vocabulary development.

Authors:  Steve Majerus; Lucie Heiligenstein; Nathalie Gautherot; Martine Poncelet; Martial Van der Linden
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2008-09-07

6.  Word-frequency effects on short-term memory tasks: evidence for a redintegration process in immediate serial recall.

Authors:  C Hulme; S Roodenrys; R Schweickert; G D Brown; M Martin; G Stuart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Effect of stimulus bandwidth on the perception of /s/ in normal- and hearing-impaired children and adults.

Authors:  P G Stelmachowicz; A L Pittman; B M Hoover; D E Lewis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.

Authors:  Arlene C Neuman; Marcin Wroblewski; Joshua Hajicek; Adrienne Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Children's phoneme identification in reverberation and noise.

Authors:  C E Johnson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Performance-intensity functions for normal-hearing adults and children using computer-aided speech perception assessment.

Authors:  Ryan McCreery; Rindy Ito; Merry Spratford; Dawna Lewis; Brenda Hoover; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  8 in total

1.  Interactions Between Item Set and Vocoding in Serial Recall.

Authors:  Adam K Bosen; Mary C Luckasen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Speech-Processing Fatigue in Children: Auditory Event-Related Potential and Behavioral Measures.

Authors:  Alexandra P Key; Samantha J Gustafson; Lindsey Rentmeester; Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Fred H Bess
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  On the use of the TIMIT, QuickSIN, NU-6, and other widely used bandlimited speech materials for speech perception experiments.

Authors:  Brian B Monson; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.482

4.  Effect of minimal/mild hearing loss on children's speech understanding in a simulated classroom.

Authors:  Dawna E Lewis; Daniel L Valente; Jody L Spalding
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Children's understanding of instructions presented in noise and reverberation.

Authors:  Dawna E Lewis; Crystal M Manninen; Daniel L Valente; Nicholas A Smith
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.493

6.  Listening Effort and Speech Recognition with Frequency Compression Amplification for Children and Adults with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Dawna Lewis; Ryan McCreery; Judy Kopun; Joshua M Alexander
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Are Experienced Hearing Aid Users Faster at Grasping the Meaning of a Sentence Than Inexperienced Users? An Eye-Tracking Study.

Authors:  Julia Habicht; Birger Kollmeier; Tobias Neher
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Extended High Frequencies Provide Both Spectral and Temporal Information to Improve Speech-in-Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Allison Trine; Brian B Monson
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.