Literature DB >> 27080687

Individual Differences in Behavioural Decision Weights Related to Irregularities in Cochlear Mechanics.

Jungmee Lee1, Inseok Heo2, An-Chieh Chang2, Kristen Bond2, Christophe Stoelinga2, Robert Lutfi2, Glenis Long3.   

Abstract

An unexpected finding of previous psychophysical studies is that listeners show highly replicable, individualistic patterns of decision weights on frequencies affecting their performance in spectral discrimination tasks--what has been referred to as individual listening styles. We, like many other researchers, have attributed these listening styles to peculiarities in how listeners attend to sounds, but we now believe they partially reflect irregularities in cochlear micromechanics modifying what listeners hear. The most striking evidence for cochlear irregularities is the presence of low-level spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) measured in the ear canal and the systematic variation in stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs), both of which result from back-propagation of waves in the cochlea. SOAEs and SFOAEs vary greatly across individual ears and have been shown to affect behavioural thresholds, behavioural frequency selectivity and judged loudness for tones. The present paper reports pilot data providing evidence that SOAEs and SFOAEs are also predictive of the relative decision weight listeners give to a pair of tones in a level discrimination task. In one condition the frequency of one tone was selected to be near that of an SOAE and the frequency of the other was selected to be in a frequency region for which there was no detectable SOAE. In a second condition the frequency of one tone was selected to correspond to an SFOAE maximum, the frequency of the other tone, an SFOAE minimum. In both conditions a statistically significant correlation was found between the average relative decision weight on the two tones and the difference in OAE levels.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavioural decision weights; Level discrimination; Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions; Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27080687      PMCID: PMC5079619          DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25474-6_48

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  20 in total

1.  Effects of a limited class of nonlinearities on estimates of relative weights.

Authors:  Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Fine structure of hearing threshold and loudness perception.

Authors:  Manfred Mauermann; Glenis R Long; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Interrelationships between spontaneous and low-level stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Analydia Fulcher; Susan Richmond; David Velenovsky; Jungmee Lee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Informational masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners: sensation level and decision weights.

Authors:  Joshua M Alexander; Robert A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Molecular analysis of the effect of relative tone level on multitone pattern discrimination.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory and psychological factors in 'auditory disability with normal hearing'.

Authors:  K King; D Stephens
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1992

7.  A new approach to sound source segregation.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Ching-Ju Liu; Christophe N J Stoelinga
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  Observer efficiency and weights in a multiple observation task.

Authors:  B G Berg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Investigations into the nature of the association between threshold microstructure and otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  G R Long; A Tubis
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  2 in total

1.  A test of model classes accounting for individual differences in the cocktail-party effect.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Briana Rodriguez; Jungmee Lee; Torben Pastore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Molecular analysis of individual differences in talker search at the cocktail-party.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Torben Pastore; Briana Rodriguez; William A Yost; Jungmee Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.482

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.