Literature DB >> 8423261

Audibility of partials in inharmonic complex tones.

B C Moore1, K Ohgushi.   

Abstract

These experiments examined the ability of musically trained subjects to hear out individual partials in complex tones with partials uniformly spaced on a scale related to the equivalent rectangular bandwidth (ERB) of the auditory filter. ERB spacings of 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, and 2 were used, and the central component always had a frequency of 1000 Hz. All components had a level of 65 dB SPL. On each trial, subjects heard a pure tone (the "probe") followed by a complex tone. The probe was close in frequency to one of the partials in the complex, but was mistuned downward by 4.5% on half the trials (at random) and mistuned upward by 4.5% on the other half. The task of the subject was to indicate whether the probe was higher or lower in frequency than the nearest partial in the complex. The partial that was "probed" varied randomly from trial to trial. Scores for the highest and lowest components in the complexes were generally high (> 90%) for component spacings greater than 1 ERB, but worsened somewhat for ERB spacings of 0.75 and 1.0. Scores for the inner components were close to chance level at 0.75-ERB spacing, and improved progressively as the ERB spacing was increased from 1 to 2 ERBs. For ERB spacings of 1.25 or less, the scores did not change smoothly with component frequency; marked irregularities were observed, as well as systematic errors. An explanation for these is suggested in terms of irregularities in the middle ear transfer function. Performance for the inner components tended to be worse for component frequencies above 1000 Hz than below 1000 Hz. It is suggested that this happens because the pitches of partials are partly coded in the time patterns of neural impulses (phase locking), and the precision of phase locking deteriorates progressively with increasing frequency above 1000 Hz. The auditory filter shapes of the subjects were measured for a center frequency of 1000 Hz, using the notched noise method. One subject had a broader auditory filter than the other three subjects, and this same subject generally had more difficulty in hearing out partials from complex tones than the other subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8423261     DOI: 10.1121/1.405625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  Inharmonicity detection. Effects of age and contralateral distractor sounds.

Authors:  Manon Grube; D Yves von Cramon; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Pitch perception for mixtures of spectrally overlapping harmonic complex tones.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Michael V Keebler; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of relative and absolute frequency in the spectral weighting of loudness.

Authors:  Suyash Narendra Joshi; Marcin Wróblewski; Kendra K Schmid; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Basic auditory processes involved in the analysis of speech sounds.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Level dominance in sound source identification.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Ching-Ju Liu; Christophe Stoelinga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Pitch discrimination interference: the role of ear of entry and of octave similarity.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Ervin R Hafter; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  On the possibility of a place code for the low pitch of high-frequency complex tones.

Authors:  Sébastien Santurette; Torsten Dau; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Perceptual weights for loudness judgments of six-tone complexes.

Authors:  Walt Jesteadt; Daniel L Valente; Suyash N Joshi; Kendra K Schmid
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Does a pitch rating method converge on the frequencies within tonal stimuli?

Authors:  Jennifer J Lentz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Relative contributions of specific frequency bands to the loudness of broadband sounds.

Authors:  Walt Jesteadt; Sara M Walker; Oluwaseye A Ogun; Brenda Ohlrich; Katyarina E Brunette; Marcin Wróblewski; Kendra K Schmid
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.