Literature DB >> 28964048

Relative contributions of specific frequency bands to the loudness of broadband sounds.

Walt Jesteadt1, Sara M Walker1, Oluwaseye A Ogun1, Brenda Ohlrich1, Katyarina E Brunette1, Marcin Wróblewski1, Kendra K Schmid2.   

Abstract

Listeners with normal hearing (NH) and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) were asked to compare pairs of noise stimuli and choose the louder noise in each pair. Each noise was made up of 15, two-ERBN (equivalent rectangular bandwidth) wide frequency bands that varied independently over a 12-dB range from one presentation to the next. Mean levels of the bands followed the long-term average speech spectrum (LTASS) or were set to 43, 51, or 59 dB sound pressure level (SPL). The relative contribution of each band to the total loudness of the noise was determined by computing the correlation between the difference in levels for a given band on every trial and the listener's decision on that trial. Weights for SNHL listeners were governed by audibility and the spectrum of the noise stimuli, with bands near the spectral peak of the LTASS noise receiving greatest weight. NH listeners assigned greater weight to the lowest and highest bands, an effect that increased with overall level, but did not assign greater weight to bands near the LTASS peak. Additional loudness-matching and paired-comparison studies using stimuli missing one of the 15 bands showed a significant contribution by the highest band, but properties other than loudness may have contributed to the decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28964048      PMCID: PMC5612800          DOI: 10.1121/1.5003778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  34 in total

1.  A measure of internal noise based on sample discrimination.

Authors:  Walt Jesteadt; Lance Nizami; Kim S Schairer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Contributions of individual components to the overall loudness of a multitone complex.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Hongyang Tan; Samar Khaddam; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Observer efficiency and weights in a multiple observation task.

Authors:  B G Berg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A comparison of the temporal weighting of annoyance and loudness.

Authors:  Kerstin Dittrich; Daniel Oberfeld
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. IV. Fitting hearing aids with multi-channel compression so as to restore 'normal' loudness for speech at different levels.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  2000-06

6.  Categorical loudness scaling and equal-loudness contours in listeners with normal hearing and hearing loss.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Andrea C Trevino; Jessa N Gombert; Lauren Liebig-Trehearn; Judy G Kopun; Walt Jesteadt; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Audibility of partials in inharmonic complex tones.

Authors:  B C Moore; K Ohgushi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  A signal-detection-theory measure of pitch shifts in sinusoids as a function of intensity.

Authors:  W Jesteadt; D L Neff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Spectral weights for sample discrimination as a function of overall level.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Hongyang Tan; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Modeling binaural loudness.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Brian R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  2 in total

1.  Contribution of frequency bands to the loudness of broadband sounds: Tonal and noise stimuli.

Authors:  Walt Jesteadt; Marcin Wróblewski; Robin High
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Cross-frequency weights in normal and impaired hearing: Stimulus factors, stimulus dimensions, and associations with speech recognition.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Judy R Dubno; Virginia M Richards; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.