Literature DB >> 35918501

Stimulation Rate and Voice Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implants.

Damir Kovačić1, Chris J James2.   

Abstract

The stimulation rate in cochlear implant (CI) sound coding, or the "carrier" rate in pulses per second (pps), is known to influence pitch perception, as well as loudness perception and sound quality. Our main objective was to investigate the effects of reduced carrier rate on the loudness and pitch of coded speech samples. We describe two experiments with 16 Nucleus® CI users, where we controlled modulation characteristics and carrier rate using Spectral and Temporal Enhanced Processing (STEP), a novel experimental multichannel sound coder. We used a fixed set of threshold and comfortable stimulation levels for each subject, obtained from clinical MAPs. In the first experiment, we determined equivalence for voice pitch ranking and voice gender categorization between the Advanced Combination Encoder (ACE), a widely used clinical strategy in Nucleus® recipients, and STEP for fundamental frequencies (F0) 120-250 Hz. In the second experiment, loudness was determined as a function of the input amplitude of speech samples for carrier rates of 1000, 500, and 250 pps per channel. Then, using equally loud sound coder programs, we evaluated the effect of carrier rate on voice pitch perception. Although nearly all subjects could categorize voice gender significantly above chance, pitch ranking varied across subjects. Overall, carrier rate did not substantially affect voice pitch ranking or voice gender categorization: as long as the carrier rate was at least twice the fundamental frequency, or when stimulation pulses for the lowest, 250 pps carrier were aligned to F0 peaks. These results indicate that carrier rates as low as 250 pps per channel are sufficient to support functional voice pitch perception for those CI users sensitive to temporal pitch cues; at least when temporal modulations and pulse timings in the coder output are well controlled by novel strategies such as STEP.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear implants; loudness; sound coding strategy; stimulation rate; voice gender categorization; voice pitch

Year:  2022        PMID: 35918501     DOI: 10.1007/s10162-022-00854-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  27 in total

1.  Temporal pitch mechanisms in acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Astrid van Wieringen; Christopher J Long; John M Deeks; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of stimulation rate on modulation detection and speech recognition by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Komal Arora; Andrew Vandali; Richard Dowell; Pam Dawson
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Electrical stimulation rate effects on speech perception in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Komal Arora; Pam Dawson; Richard Dowell; Andrew Vandali
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Detection and rate discrimination of amplitude modulation in electrical hearing.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Cherish Oberzut
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Speech perception with F0mod, a cochlear implant pitch coding strategy.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Alejandro Osses; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  The effect of presentation level and stimulation rate on speech perception and modulation detection for cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Tim Brochier; Hugh J McDermott; Colette M McKay
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Influence of stimulation rate and loudness growth on modulation detection and intensity discrimination in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  A method to dynamically control unwanted loudness cues when measuring amplitude modulation detection in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Sandy Oba; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Variations in carrier pulse rate and the perception of amplitude modulation in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Tim Green; Andrew Faulkner; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Temporal modulation transfer functions in cochlear implantees using a method that limits overall loudness cues.

Authors:  Matthew Fraser; Colette M McKay
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.