Literature DB >> 11033251

The neuronal response to electrical constant-amplitude pulse train stimulation: evoked compound action potential recordings.

A J Matsuoka1, P J Abbas, J T Rubinstein, C A Miller.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to gain a greater understanding of the electrically evoked compound action potential (EAP) responses to pulse train stimulation. Analysis of EAP amplitude responses suggested that an alternating pattern varied depending upon stimulus level, interpulse interval (IPI), stimulus waveform, and stimulus polarity. Stimulus level-dependent recovery was seen in the cat and the guinea pig: higher stimulus level tended to provide faster recovery. Both polarity-dependent recovery and polarity-dependent adaptation were observed in the cat and these stimulus polarity effects were less consistent in the guinea pig. The polarity-dependent recovery effect supports the hypothesis that anodal and cathodal stimuli excite different sites along auditory nerve fibers. Amplitude differences between the response to the second pulse and the steady-state response at the same IPI are significantly greater for anodal stimuli than for cathodal stimuli in all cats. These data suggest that there is a cumulative refractory effect in the auditory nerve of cats, especially in response to anodal stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11033251     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(00)00172-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  21 in total

1.  Discharge properties of identified cochlear nucleus neurons and auditory nerve fibers in response to repetitive electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Alexander L Babalian; David K Ryugo; Eric M Rouiller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Sarah A Laurello
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Electrical excitation of the acoustically sensitive auditory nerve: single-fiber responses to electric pulse trains.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Barbara K Robinson; Kirill V Nourski; Fawen Zhang; Fuh-Cherng Jeng
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-16

4.  Temporal Response Properties of the Auditory Nerve in Implanted Children with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder and Implanted Children with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Shuman He; Paul J Abbas; Danielle V Doyle; Tyler C McFayden; Stephen Mulherin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  How electrically evoked compound action potentials in chronically implanted guinea pigs relate to auditory nerve health and electrode impedance.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Deborah J Colesa; Christopher J Buswinka; Andrew M Rabah; Donald L Swiderski; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Forward Masking in Cochlear Implant Users: Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Data Using Pulse Train Maskers.

Authors:  Youssef Adel; Gaston Hilkhuysen; Arnaud Noreña; Yves Cazals; Stéphane Roman; Olivier Macherey
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-21

7.  Characterization of the electrically evoked compound action potential of the vestibular nerve.

Authors:  Kaibao Nie; Steven M Bierer; Leo Ling; Trey Oxford; Jay T Rubinstein; James O Phillips
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  The relation between auditory-nerve temporal responses and perceptual rate integration in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Jenny L Goehring
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Detection of acoustic temporal fine structure by cochlear implant listeners: behavioral results and computational modeling.

Authors:  Nikita S Imennov; Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Elyse Jameyson; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Acoustic-electric interactions in the guinea pig auditory nerve: simultaneous and forward masking of the electrically evoked compound action potential.

Authors:  Kirill V Nourski; Paul J Abbas; Charles A Miller; Barbara K Robinson; Fuh-Cherng Jeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.