Many polyketide natural products exhibit invaluable medicinal properties, yet much remains to be understood regarding the machinery responsible for their biosynthesis. The recently discovered trans-acyltransferase polyketide synthases employ processing enzymes that catalyze modifications unique from those of the classical cis-acyltransferase polyketide synthases. The enoyl-isomerase domains of these megasynthases shift double bonds and are well-represented by an enzyme that helps forge the triene system within the antibiotic produced by the prototypical bacillaene synthase. This first crystal structure of an enoyl-isomerase, at 1.73 Å resolution, not only revealed relationships between this class of enzymes and dehydratases but also guided an investigation into the mechanism of double bond migration. The catalytic histidine, positioned differently from that of dehydratases, was demonstrated to independently shuttle a proton between the γ- and α-positions of the intermediate. This unprecedented mechanism highlights the catalytic diversity of divergent enzymes within trans-acyltransferase polyketide synthases.
Many polyketide natural products exhibit invaluable medicinal properties, yet much remains to be understood regarding the machinery responsible for their biosynthesis. The recently discovered trans-acyltransferase polyketide synthases employ processing enzymes that catalyze modifications unique from those of the classical cis-acyltransferase polyketide synthases. The enoyl-isomerase domains of these megasynthases shift double bonds and are well-represented by an enzyme that helps forge the triene system within the antibiotic produced by the prototypical bacillaene synthase. This first crystal structure of an enoyl-isomerase, at 1.73 Å resolution, not only revealed relationships between this class of enzymes and dehydratases but also guided an investigation into the mechanism of double bond migration. The catalytic histidine, positioned differently from that of dehydratases, was demonstrated to independently shuttle a proton between the γ- and α-positions of the intermediate. This unprecedented mechanism highlights the catalytic diversity of divergent enzymes within trans-acyltransferase polyketide synthases.
Polyketides are a structurally
diverse class of natural products manufactured by a broad spectrum
of bacteria, fungi, and plants. The clinical importance of such polyketides
as the antibiotic erythromycin and the cholesterol-lowering agent
lovastatin has led to the structural, functional, and mechanistic
investigation of the enzymatic machinery responsible for their synthesis.[1] Type I polyketide synthases (PKSs) employ biosynthetic
logic similar to the metazoan fatty acid synthase, which iteratively
condenses and reduces acetate units into fatty acyl chains.[2,3] In contrast to fatty acid synthesis, PKSs operate in an assembly
line fashion, where modules (sets of domains responsible for a single
round of condensation and processing) are structured in a linear arrangement,
each obtaining a ketide extender unit selected by an acyltransferase
domain (AT), condensing that extender unit to a growing polyketide
chain with the ketosynthase domain (KS) and processing the resulting
β-ketoacyl chain depending on which processing domains are associated
with the module. These domains include a ketoreductase (KR) that catalyzes
stereoselective reduction of the β-carbonyl, a dehydratase (DH)
that yields an α,β double bond through the elimination
of water, and an enoylreductase (ER) that reduces the double bond
to yield a completely saturated acyl intermediate.Type I PKSs
have been subdivided into two classes depending on
whether ATs are encoded within modules (cis-AT PKSs)
or discretely encoded as separate polypeptides that dock to the synthase
(trans-AT PKSs).[4] While
each of the domains from cis-AT PKSs have been structurally
characterized, only recently has structural information become available
for domains found within trans-AT PKS assembly lines.[1,5−7] The earliest discovered and archetypal trans-AT PKS is encoded within the Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens genomes (PksX and Bae, respectively)
and is responsible for the biosynthesis of the polyketidebacillaene,
a polyene diamide that inhibits prokaryotic protein synthesis.[8] This PKS is illustrative of the unusual combinatorial
logic in trans-AT PKS systems, which are commonly
fused with nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS) and employ processing
domains such as methyltransferases, enoyl-CoA hydratases, pyran synthases,
and β-branching domains (B), rarely or not observed in cis-AT PKSs.[4] The evolutionary
acquisition of these additional processing domains has permitted trans-AT PKSs to explore a vast realm of possible molecular
configurations, yielding natural products with functionalities not
accessible to PKSs restricted to the traditional processing reactions
employed in fatty acid biosynthesis.One of the additional processing
domains available to trans-AT PKSs is the enoyl-isomerase
domain (EI), which has been previously
annotated as an inactive DH or DH* due to sequence alignments that
predicted a DH double-hotdog fold.[9−11] This domain is located
in what has been termed “shift-modules” that yield intermediates
with β,γ double bonds, in contrast to the classic α,β-unsaturated
products of DH catalysis (Figure 1). Olefins
within polyketides impact the sterically available conformations of
the final product more than any other functional group, and therefore
several studies have recently been conducted to determine if this
domain is responsible for the isomerization of double bonds to positions
“out-of-register” with classical PKS biosynthetic logic.
Some DH domains contain intrinsic isomerase activity, which has been
shown for DHs from the bacillaene PKS (Figure 1B).[10] Both dehydration and α,β
→ β,γ double bond isomerization for C5–C6
and C7–C8 in bacillaene were demonstrated to occur within the
first two DHs of PksN, without the participation of a dedicated EI
domain. Whether the isomerization of the β,γ double bond
at C3–C4 of bacillaene was also catalyzed by the inherent isomerase
activity of the third DH remained undetermined, and sequence alignments
revealed that the following module could potentially be a shift-module.
Figure 1
Polyketides
with shifted double bonds. (A) Several polyketides
with isomerized double bonds are highlighted with blue circles. The
C3-C4 double bond of bacillaene, isomerized by PksEI14, is annotated.
(B) The last two PKS subunits responsible for the final catalytic
steps of bacillaene biosynthesis are PksN and PksR. The proposed route
involves the installation of β,γ double bonds by the DH
domains of modules 11 and 12 (PksDH11 and PksDH12), while the EI domain
of module 14 is a dedicated isomerase for the α,β double
bond installed by the DH from module 13 (PksDH13). The KS domain of
the terminal module (PksKS15) is not condensationally competent and
likely acts as a gatekeeper to ensure that the isomerization has taken
place before the final product is released from the synthase. The
small red circles appended to the KS domains indicate the presence
of a flanking subdomain.
Polyketides
with shifted double bonds. (A) Several polyketides
with isomerized double bonds are highlighted with blue circles. The
C3-C4 double bond of bacillaene, isomerized by PksEI14, is annotated.
(B) The last two PKS subunits responsible for the final catalytic
steps of bacillaene biosynthesis are PksN and PksR. The proposed route
involves the installation of β,γ double bonds by the DH
domains of modules 11 and 12 (PksDH11 and PksDH12), while the EI domain
of module 14 is a dedicated isomerase for the α,β double
bond installed by the DH from module 13 (PksDH13). The KS domain of
the terminal module (PksKS15) is not condensationally competent and
likely acts as a gatekeeper to ensure that the isomerization has taken
place before the final product is released from the synthase. The
small red circles appended to the KS domains indicate the presence
of a flanking subdomain.The EI domain of the rhizoxin PKS (at the N-terminus of RhiE)
has
been shown to be responsible for α,β → β,γ
double bond isomerization, and a strain with an EI knockout prevented
polyketide transfer downstream of the disruption.[9] Whether this is due to KS selectivity for the properly
isomerized product or interference with docking between RhiD and RhiE
is unclear. A mechanism was proposed for EI-catalyzed isomerization
that involved a histidine conserved between DH and EI domains, as
well as an unknown residue that could act as a general base. More
recently, the EI domain from the corallopyronin A synthase was isolated
and studied.[11]In vitro reconstitution of isomerase activity coupled with site-directed
mutagenesis revealed that the proposed active site histidine is indeed
required for catalysis; however, the unknown residue that acts in
cooperation with this histidine could not be determined through mutagenic
knockouts of proposed active site residues.Here we report the
1.73 Å resolution crystal structure and
reconstituted in vitro activity of the EI domain
from the 14th module of the bacillaene PksX synthase (PksEI14). The
structure reveals how a key active site substitution of a proline
residue conserved among PKS DH domains permits the catalytic histidine
to act as both a general base and general acid in the isomerization
of a double bond. Experiments conducted in deuterated solvent reveal
that the mechanism proceeds through the relocation of a substrate
γ-proton to the α-position without solvent interference,
similar to the mechanism of double bond isomerization catalyzed by
ketosteroid isomerase.[12] The structure
also shows that the EI domains may not contribute significantly to
the dimerization of trans-AT PKS polypeptides, in
contrast to what has been observed for cis-AT PKSs.[13−15] The structural and biochemical evidence presented here reveals an
unprecedented mechanism for double bond isomerization and suggests
that PksEI14 is responsible for the final step in the formation of
the C3–C8 triene system characteristic of bacillaene.
Results
and Discussion
The boundaries chosen for PksEI14 were based
on the boundaries
of domains upstream and downstream within PksR (PksKS14 and PksACP14,
respectively). Crystals provided diffraction data enabling a model
of PksEI14 to be refined to a resolution of 1.73 Å, with phasing
obtained by single-wavelength anomalous dispersion from crystals soaked
in methyl mercury acetate (Table 1). The structure
revealed a double-hotdog fold with an overall architecture very similar
to that of cis-AT PKS DH domains (Cα rmsd: 2.4 Å over 250 Cα when aligned with
the DH from the fourth module of the erythromycin synthase, EryDH4;
PDB code 3EL6) (Figure 2A).[13] In contrast to all known cis-AT DH structures,
PksEI14 crystallized as a monomer, without the ∼20-residue
N-terminal region observed in those DHs that mediates their dimeric
interfaces.
Table 1
Crystallographic Data and Refinement
Statisticsa
native
CH3-Hg derivative
Data Collection
wavelength (Å)
1.0332
0.9763
space group
P212121
P212121
cell dimensions, a, b, c (Å)
48.8, 68.3, 77.8
48.7, 68.2, 78.1
resolution (Å)
35.37–1.73
51.3–1.88
Rmerge
0.113 (0.702)
0.066 (0.520)
I/σ(I)
48.3 (2.5)
26.1 (5.1)
no.
of reflections
25889 (1429)
21801 (3088)
completeness
(%)
97.6 (74.4)
99.5 (98.9)
redundancy
3.5 (2.4)
14 (13.7)
Wilson B value (Å2)
41.3
24.7
no. of heavy atom sites
2
figure of merit
0.37
Refinement
resolution (Å)
35.37–1.73
no. of reflections
25889 (1429)
Rwork/Rfree
0.214/0.239
no. of atoms
protein
1932
water
131
av B factors
(Å2)
protein
41.1
water
50.2
RMS
deviations
bond lengths (Å)
0.010
bond angles (deg)
1.424
Ramachandran statistics
(%)
preferred regions
98.72
allowed regions
1.28
outliers
0.0
Values in parentheses
refer to the
highest resolution shell (1.76–1.73 Å).
Figure 2
Structure of PksEI14. (A) The crystal structure of the PksEI14
monomer is shown in cartoon form, with N- and C-termini labeled with
blue and red spheres, respectively. Flexible loops that could not
be modeled into electron density are shown as dashed lines. The catalytic
histidine (His18) and active site valine (Val27) are modeled as sticks.
(B) A structural alignment of PksEI14 (orange) with the DH domain
from the erythromycin PKS (gray, PDB code 3EL6) reveals that the highly conserved proline
in the PKS DH HX8P motif is replaced with a valine, inducing
a steric repositioning of the catalytic His18 imidazole ring. Asn182
replaces the catalytic aspartic acid of the PKS DH domain. The only
active site residue that could complete a catalytic dyad is Tyr185;
however, mutation to phenylalanine did not abolish isomerase activity.
(C) Stereodiagram of active site 2Fo – Fc electron density contoured at 1.5 Å rmsd.
Yellow dashes indicate hydrogen bonds to ordered waters (each between
2.8 and 3.1 Å). See also Supplementary Figure
S1.
Structure of PksEI14. (A) The crystal structure of the PksEI14
monomer is shown in cartoon form, with N- and C-termini labeled with
blue and red spheres, respectively. Flexible loops that could not
be modeled into electron density are shown as dashed lines. The catalytic
histidine (His18) and active site valine (Val27) are modeled as sticks.
(B) A structural alignment of PksEI14 (orange) with the DH domain
from the erythromycin PKS (gray, PDB code 3EL6) reveals that the highly conserved proline
in the PKS DH HX8P motif is replaced with a valine, inducing
a steric repositioning of the catalytic His18 imidazole ring. Asn182
replaces the catalytic aspartic acid of the PKS DH domain. The only
active site residue that could complete a catalytic dyad is Tyr185;
however, mutation to phenylalanine did not abolish isomerase activity.
(C) Stereodiagram of active site 2Fo – Fc electron density contoured at 1.5 Å rmsd.
Yellow dashes indicate hydrogen bonds to ordered waters (each between
2.8 and 3.1 Å). See also Supplementary Figure
S1.Values in parentheses
refer to the
highest resolution shell (1.76–1.73 Å).A structural alignment of PksEI14
with EryDH4 reveals that the
α-carbon of the catalytic histidine (His18 of PksEI14) conserved
in both PKS DH and EI domains superposes with the α-carbon of
the catalytic histidine of EryDH4; however, the imidazole rings are
offset by ∼1.7 Å (as measured between Nε atoms) (Figure 2B). In PKS DHs, the catalytic
histidine lies in a highly conserved HX8P motif, in which
its imidazole stacks against the proline ring.[13] This motif is HX8V in PksEI14, with the Cγ1 methyl group of the valine sterically repositioning
the imidazole ring. In other PKS EI domains, leucine is observed to
substitute for the proline (Supplementary Figure
S1). The aspartic acid that completes the catalytic dyad of
PKS DHs is often substituted for an asparagine in EI domains, and
the structure reveals that this asparagine (Asn182) is also repositioned
relative to the aspartic acid. A highly conserved glutamine or histidine
in PKS DHs located four residues upstream of the catalytic aspartic
acid is presumably responsible for increasing the pKa of this residue, priming it as a proton donor during
the dehydration reaction.[15] The conservation
of this glutamine/histidine residue is not maintained among EIs and
is substituted by either a valine or leucine (Leu186 in PksEI14, Supplementary Figure S1).The previously
suggested mechanism of α,β →
β,γ double bond isomerization by the EI domain involves
an unknown residue that acts as a general base and abstracts a proton
from the γ-carbon, similar to the isomerization mechanism for
FabA.[9,11,16] However, the
structure reveals an active site pocket dominated by hydrophobic residues
that cannot participate in acid–base catalysis. The only ionizable
residue within the PksEI14 active site in position to play this role
is Tyr185, although it is not conserved among available EI sequences.
To determine whether Tyr185 is involved in catalyzing double bond
isomerization, an assay was developed in which in vitro activity from the isolated PksEI14 domain was reconstituted. As
obtaining an analogue of the natural polyketide substrate to observe
the reaction in the forward direction was challenging natural polyketide
substrate (a long, highly functionalized polyene diamide), an analogue
of the reaction product, (E)-hex-3-enyl-S-pantetheine, was prepared instead. PksEI14-mediated isomerization
yielding (E)-hex-2-enyl-S-pantetheine
would thus resemble the anticipated reverse direction for double bond
migration, namely, β,γ → α,β double
bond isomerization. The reverse of the biological reaction is anticipated
to be thermodynamically more favorable for this analogue since the
double bond of the product is conjugated with the thioester carbonyl.
Incubation of (E)-hex-3-enyl-S-pantetheine
with PksEI14 followed by reversed-phase HPLC analysis revealed substrate
conversion to a distinct species with a retention time equivalent
to that of (E)-hex-2-enyl-S-pantetheine
and UV absorbance maxima of 225 and 263 nm, characteristic of α,β-unsaturated
thioesters (Figure 3 and Supplementary Figure S2).[17] LC–MS
analysis revealed that the generated compound exhibited a molecular
weight also consistent with the anticipated product. Surprisingly,
the active site mutant in which the suspected tyrosine was replaced
with a phenylalanine, PksEI14(Tyr185Phe), catalyzed the isomerization
∼3.1-fold more rapidly, revealing that the tyrosine is not
necessary for catalysis (Figure 3). The enhancement
in rate may reflect a slightly better fit of the substrate analogue
to the altered active site. The tyrosine-to-phenylalanine mutation
is not expected to alter the mechanism for isomerization since a phenylalanine
resides in this position within the Rhizoxin EI domain (Supplementary Figure S1). An N-acetyl-cysteamine (NAC) derivative of the β,γ-unsaturated
substrate ((E)-hex-3-enyl-S-NAC)
was also incubated with PksEI14 under similar conditions; however,
isomerization to (E)-hex-2-enyl-S-NAC was negligible (Supplementary Figure S2b).
Figure 3
PksEI14 activity assay. Reversed-phase HPLC chromatograph of reconstituted in vitro isomerase activity observed after a 24 h incubation
of the β,γ-unsaturated substrate analogue with isolated
PksEI14. The black line represents a control reaction that did not
include any enzyme, revealing a single peak for (E)-hex-3-enyl-S-pantetheine. The blue line represents
the same reaction with the addition of wild-type PksEI14, revealing
a new peak with properties consistent with a synthetic standard of
(E)-hex-2-enyl-S-pantetheine, the
β,γ → α,β isomerized product. An identical
reaction replacing wild-type PksEI14 with the Tyr185Phe mutant is
shown in red, exhibiting increased isomerase activity over the same
time course. See also Supplementary Figure S2.
PksEI14 activity assay. Reversed-phase HPLC chromatograph of reconstituted in vitro isomerase activity observed after a 24 h incubation
of the β,γ-unsaturated substrate analogue with isolated
PksEI14. The black line represents a control reaction that did not
include any enzyme, revealing a single peak for (E)-hex-3-enyl-S-pantetheine. The blue line represents
the same reaction with the addition of wild-type PksEI14, revealing
a new peak with properties consistent with a synthetic standard of
(E)-hex-2-enyl-S-pantetheine, the
β,γ → α,β isomerized product. An identical
reaction replacing wild-type PksEI14 with the Tyr185Phe mutant is
shown in red, exhibiting increased isomerase activity over the same
time course. See also Supplementary Figure S2.Since the structure does not reveal
any other active site residues
that could catalyze acid–base chemistry, the general base in
the biological reaction could simply be a solvent-supplied water molecule,
similar to the isomerization mechanism proposed for the crotonase
domain of multifunctional enzyme, type-1.[18] The reverse in vitro reaction described herein
would require water to play the role of a general acid in donating
a proton to the γ-carbon. The PksEI14-catalyzed reaction described
above was conducted in D2O (with the more catalytically
proficient Tyr185Phe mutant) to observe whether a solvent-supplied
deuteron would label the γ-carbon in the product, (E)-4-deutero-hex-3-enyl-S-pantetheine. The reaction
afforded sufficient (∼3 mg) isomerized product for analysis
by 1H NMR, revealing a characteristic β-carbon proton
splitting pattern that corresponded to a completely protonated methylene
γ-carbon (Figure 4). As the α,β-unsaturated
reaction product was not purified from the β,γ-unsaturated
substrate before 1H NMR analysis, (E)-hex-3-enyl-S-pantetheine was still clearly visible in the spectrum
(1:0.52 molar ratio by proton signal integration). Greater than 95%
of the α-protons of (E)-hex-3-enyl-S-pantetheine had exchanged for deuterons during the course
of the reaction, confirming that the degree of contamination by residual
solvent protons was insignificant (Supplementary
Figure S3C). The rate of solvent-catalyzed α-proton exchange
is on approximately the same time scale as the concurrent background
hydrolysis of the labile thioester in both substrate and product,
complicating the analysis of reactions incubated longer than 24 h
(Supplementary Figure S3D).
Figure 4
PksEI14-catalyzed isomerization
in D2O. To determine
whether PksEI14 shuttles a proton within the substrate or employs
water in the catalytic mechanism, (E)-hex-3-enyl-S-pantetheine (1) was incubated with PksEI14
in D2O, and the reaction was analyzed by NMR. The negative
control (top spectrum), in which PksEI14 was not added, shows only
uncatalyzed α-hydrogen exchange. When PksEI14 is supplied (middle
spectrum), isomerization to (E)-hex-2-enyl-S-pantetheine (2) is observed. If the mechanism
of isomerization involved a solvent- or enzyme-donated proton, the
γ-position would be monodeuterated, and different splitting
patterns would be observed. The bottom spectrum is of synthetically
prepared (E)-hex-2-enyl-S-pantetheine
(2). Each of the four possible olefinic proton signals
are aligned with the corresponding region of the spectrum and denoted
with red circles. Pantetheine moieties are represented by “Pant”.
See also Supplementary Figure S3.
PksEI14-catalyzed isomerization
in D2O. To determine
whether PksEI14 shuttles a proton within the substrate or employs
water in the catalytic mechanism, (E)-hex-3-enyl-S-pantetheine (1) was incubated with PksEI14
in D2O, and the reaction was analyzed by NMR. The negative
control (top spectrum), in which PksEI14 was not added, shows only
uncatalyzed α-hydrogen exchange. When PksEI14 is supplied (middle
spectrum), isomerization to (E)-hex-2-enyl-S-pantetheine (2) is observed. If the mechanism
of isomerization involved a solvent- or enzyme-donated proton, the
γ-position would be monodeuterated, and different splitting
patterns would be observed. The bottom spectrum is of synthetically
prepared (E)-hex-2-enyl-S-pantetheine
(2). Each of the four possible olefinic proton signals
are aligned with the corresponding region of the spectrum and denoted
with red circles. Pantetheine moieties are represented by “Pant”.
See also Supplementary Figure S3.To determine if the remarkable
decrease (>10-fold) in catalytic
rate of the reaction in D2O was the result of an abnormally
large kinetic isotope effect, (E)-2,2-dideutero-hex-3-enyl-S-pantetheine was incubated with PksEI14 in H2O. Although isomerization to (E)-hex-2-enyl-S-pantetheine was observed, it could not be excluded that
the product was generated primarily from a substrate species that
had first undergone background exchange of α-deuterons for solvent
protons, compromising any conclusions drawn from analysis of the product.
The reduced catalytic rate observed for the reaction conducted in
D2O may have resulted from an alteration of the PksEI14
active site geometry caused by deuteration, as observed for haloalkane
dehalogenase.[19]To our knowledge,
the only polyketide from cis-AT PKSs that contains
a β,γ double bond is ansamitocin
(Figure 1A). Intriguingly, the ansamitocin
PKS does not contain an EI domain, yet studies have shown that the
formation of the β,γ double bond occurs while the polyketide
is tethered to the synthase, and the positioning of this double bond
is critical for downstream transfer of the growing intermediate.[20] A sequence alignment of DH domains reveals that
the highly conserved catalytic aspartic acid in the responsible DH
(AsmDH3) is replaced by a glutamic acid, which may help enable an
unusual β,ε-dehydration of the substrate. Although the
migration of double bonds by polyunsaturated fatty acid synthases
has also been proposed to be catalyzed by dedicated shift modules,
no cis-AT PKS pathway has been discovered that employs
a dedicated EI domain to catalyze α,β → β,γ
double bond isomerization.[21]As suggested
by the results presented here, the forward biological
reaction (α,β → β,γ double bond isomerization)
would be thermodynamically unfavorable if the substrate did not harbor
a moiety at the δ-position available for conjugation with a
β,γ double bond (e.g., double bond, amide, carbonyl).
For PksEI14, this functional group is supplied by the δ,ε
double bond installed by PksDH12. This δ,ε double bond
is in conjugation with the double bond installed by PksDH11, which
is in conjugation with the amide formed by the preceding NRPS module.
While the amide likely sets a thermodynamically favorable foundation
for the three subsequent double bond shifts, sequence alignments do
not provide a clear explanation for how PksDH11 and PksDH12 are able
to catalyze both dehydration and isomerization without a dedicated
EI domain. These DHs could mediate isomerization after normal α,β-dehydration,
similar to the mechanism proposed for FabA.[16] Also possible is that the DHs of these modules directly dehydrate
the β,γ-positions through the elimination of a γ-proton
and β-hydroxyl; this type of dehydration may be facilitated
by the increased acidity of the γ-proton adjacent to the amide
or double bond at the δ,ε-position. In addition to the
bacillaene EI domain, the EIs of both the rhizoxin and corallopyronin
PKSs isomerize double bonds into conjugation with preexisting functional
groups at the δ,ε-position (a double bond and amide, respectively).
Whether PksDH13 is capable of catalyzing isomerization is unknown;
perhaps PksEI14 is more compatible with the substrate (e.g., due to
its geometry or presence of an α-substituent).Our results
suggest that the mechanism for double bond isomerization
by the EI domain proceeds via the shuttling of a substrate proton
by a single active site histidine, similar to the mechanism of triose
phosphate isomerase.[22] An alignment of
the six crystal structures of cis-AT PKS DHs solved
to date reveal that the imidazole groups of the catalytic histidines
superpose nearly perfectly,[15] yet the imidazole
group of PksEI14 is relatively shifted ∼1.7 Å (as measured
between Nε atoms) (Figure 2B). Since the EI domain possesses the same double-hotdog fold as
the DH domain, the ACP-bound substrate may be presented to the active
site residues of these two domains in a similar manner. The shifting
of the catalytic histidine from its position in DH domains is approximately
the distance of a carbon–carbon bond and could position the
imidazole group between the sites of proton abstraction and donation.
The shuttling of a substrate proton catalyzed by a single residue
to isomerize a double bond has been proposed for several other isomerases,
including ketosteroid isomerase, human mitochondrial enoyl-CoA isomerase,
cyclohexenylcarbonyl-CoA isomerase, and Δ3,5,Δ2,4-dienoyl-CoA isomerase.[12,23−25]The possible intermediate of the mechanism proposed here involves
either the transient protonation of the thioester carbonyl to an enol
or the formation of an enolate that is stabilized by an oxyanion hole.
To better understand how the single active site histidine catalyzes
isomerization unaided and what the intermediate may be, substrate
and product analogues were modeled into the active site of PksEI14.
The location of the substrate and product were subjected to several
restraints. First, a conserved positively charged residue and phenylalanine
have been suggested to form the ACP-docking site for cis-AT PKS DHs, and these residues are retained in PksEI14 (Lys257 and
Phe204).[13] The modeled substrate and product
were therefore oriented so that the phosphopantetheinyl arm would
be in close proximity to these residues. Second, since the active
site histidine must interact with both the α- and γ-carbons
of the polyketide, a second restraint limited the distance of these
carbons to within 3.0 Å of the ε-nitrogen of the catalytic
histidine. Finally, the remaining atoms were manually adjusted to
minimize steric clash. These restraints revealed that the thioester
carbonyl would be positioned to replace Wat2, forming hydrogen bonds
with both the backbone amide of Gly28 and Wat3 (Figure 5). Gly28 is located on the N-terminal end of the first central
α-helix, which contributes a partial positive charge from the
helix dipole. Wat3 is coordinated by the carboxamide side chain of
Asn182 (which replaces the catalytic aspartic acid of PKS DHs) and
the backbone amide of Ala29, the second residue of this central helix
(Figure 2C). An oxyanion hole formed by these
two interactions could stabilize the thioester in an enolate form.
No ionizable side chain is available in this region to donate a proton
to the thioester carbonyl to form an enol intermediate. The participation
of water molecules as oxyanion hole hydrogen bond donors is quite
common among enolizing enzymes.[26] If the
model presented in Figure 5 is an accurate
representation of how the substrate binds to the active site of PksEI14,
the stereoselectivity of the in vivo reaction would
generate an S stereochemistry at the methyl-bearing
α-carbon (C2 of bacillaene).
Figure 5
Proposed mechanism for double bond migration.
Shown in three panels
is the proposed mechanism for the biological reaction catalyzed by
the PKS EI domain. Bacillaene carbon atoms are modeled in cyan, “R”
represents bacillaene atoms not shown in the figure, and “R′”
represents the ACP phosphopantetheinyl arm. Each yellow dashed line
indicates a distance of 2.8–3.1 Å, and the red dashed
lines indicate a distance of 2.2 Å. (A) The substrate modeled
contains an α-methyl branch and is unsaturated at the α,β
and δ,ε positions to resemble the biological intermediate.
The thioester oxygen atom is modeled in the place of water W2 (see
Figure 2C). Catalysis is initiated by the abstraction
of a γ-proton by the catalytic histidine. (B) The enolate is
stabilized by the polarization of the thioester carbonyl, which forms
interactions with the positive dipole of a central α-helix.
(C) In the final panel, the proton abstracted from the γ-position
has been shuttled to the α-position.
Proposed mechanism for double bond migration.
Shown in three panels
is the proposed mechanism for the biological reaction catalyzed by
the PKS EI domain. Bacillaenecarbon atoms are modeled in cyan, “R”
represents bacillaene atoms not shown in the figure, and “R′”
represents the ACP phosphopantetheinyl arm. Each yellow dashed line
indicates a distance of 2.8–3.1 Å, and the red dashed
lines indicate a distance of 2.2 Å. (A) The substrate modeled
contains an α-methyl branch and is unsaturated at the α,β
and δ,ε positions to resemble the biological intermediate.
The thioester oxygen atom is modeled in the place of water W2 (see
Figure 2C). Catalysis is initiated by the abstraction
of a γ-proton by the catalytic histidine. (B) The enolate is
stabilized by the polarization of the thioester carbonyl, which forms
interactions with the positive dipole of a central α-helix.
(C) In the final panel, the proton abstracted from the γ-position
has been shuttled to the α-position.In contrast to each of the structures of cis-AT
PKS DHs that have been solved to date, PksEI14 crystallized as a monomer.
This raises questions regarding the architecture of trans-AT PKS shift-modules, represented by module 14 of PksX (generally
composed of a condensation-incompetent KS, an EI, and an ACP domain). cis-AT PKS DHs dimerize primarily through interactions between
their 20 N-terminal residues.[13−15] However, an equivalent N-terminal
stretch is absent in both PksEI14 and the homologous domain from the
Bae synthase. The recently published structure of the KS-B didomain
from the rhizoxin trans-AT PKS reveals that the B
domain, structurally homologous to a DH domain, dimerizes quite differently
from cis-AT PKS DHs with a less extensive interface.[5] This smaller interface may also be the only interaction
between the EI domains of shift modules.This study reports
the first structure of the trans-AT PKS EI domain,
revealing how divergent evolution of the double-hotdog
fold has rendered an additional PKS domain capable of distinct chemistry.[27−29] The results presented here strongly suggest that a key active site
modification between PKS DH and EI domains enables the EI histidine
to shuttle a proton between the α- and γ-carbons of an
enoyl intermediate. Characterization of the reconstituted in vitro activity catalyzed by PksEI14 in deuterated solvent
supports a mechanism whereby a γ-proton (C4 of bacillaene) is
abstracted by the active site histidine and is relocated to the α-position
(C2) without the participation of solvent protons. To our knowledge,
this enzymatic mechanism is the first example of a histidine independently
shuttling a substrate proton to catalyze α,β →
β,γ double bond isomerization.
Methods
Cloning,
Expression, and Purification
The gene corresponding
to PksEI14 was amplified from B. subtilis ssp. 168,
cloned into the LIC expression vector pGAY28b, and expressed heterologously
in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3).[30] Hexahistidine-tagged PksEI14 was purified from cell lysate
using immobilized metal affinity and size-exclusion chromatography.
The mutation of the active site tyrosine to phenylalanine (Tyr185Phe)
was accomplished using standard gene mutation techniques, and the
resulting protein was purified in a similar manner to the wild-type.
Crystallization and Structure Determination
Crystals
of PksEI14 grew over 1–4 days by sitting drop vapor diffusion
at 22 °C in a condition composed of ammonium sulfate and Tris-HCl.
The structure was initially solved by single-wavelength anomalous
dispersion using crystals soaked in a solution containing methyl mercuric
acetate. The experimental phases provided an initial map, which was
used to construct a model that was further refined with a 1.73 Å
resolution native data set. The coordinates for PksEI14 have been
deposited in the Protein Data Bank, accession code 4U3V.
Authors: Severin Sasso; Georg Pohnert; Martin Lohr; Maria Mittag; Christian Hertweck Journal: FEMS Microbiol Rev Date: 2011-09-27 Impact factor: 16.408
Authors: Jana Moldenhauer; Daniel C G Götz; Christian R Albert; Sebastian K Bischof; Kathrin Schneider; Roderich D Süssmuth; Marianne Engeser; Harald Gross; Gerhard Bringmann; Jörn Piel Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2010-02-15 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Sanna T Partanen; Dmitry K Novikov; Alexander N Popov; Anu M Mursula; J Kalervo Hiltunen; Rik K Wierenga Journal: J Mol Biol Date: 2004-09-24 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: Lucile Moynié; Stuart M Leckie; Stephen A McMahon; Fraser G Duthie; Alessa Koehnke; James W Taylor; Magnus S Alphey; Ruth Brenk; Andrew D Smith; James H Naismith Journal: J Mol Biol Date: 2012-11-19 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: Jeremy R Lohman; Ming Ma; Jerzy Osipiuk; Boguslaw Nocek; Youngchang Kim; Changsoo Chang; Marianne Cuff; Jamey Mack; Lance Bigelow; Hui Li; Michael Endres; Gyorgy Babnigg; Andrzej Joachimiak; George N Phillips; Ben Shen Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-09-29 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Drew T Wagner; Jia Zeng; Constance B Bailey; Darren C Gay; Fang Yuan; Hannah R Manion; Adrian T Keatinge-Clay Journal: Structure Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Irimpan I Mathews; Kim Allison; Thomas Robbins; Artem Y Lyubimov; Monarin Uervirojnangkoorn; Axel T Brunger; Chaitan Khosla; Hasan DeMirci; Scott E McPhillips; Michael Hollenbeck; Michael Soltis; Aina E Cohen Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: William D Fiers; Greg J Dodge; David H Sherman; Janet L Smith; Courtney C Aldrich Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 15.419