The use of hybrid hemoglobin (Hb), with mesoheme substituted for protoheme, allows separate monitoring of the α or β hemes along the allosteric pathway. Using resonance Raman (rR) spectroscopy in silica gel, which greatly slows protein motions, we have observed that the Fe-histidine stretching frequency, νFeHis, which is a monitor of heme reactivity, evolves between frequencies characteristic of the R and T states, for both α or β chains, prior to the quaternary R-T and T-R shifts. Computation of νFeHis, using QM/MM and the conformational search program PELE, produced remarkable agreement with experiment. Analysis of the PELE structures showed that the νFeHis shifts resulted from heme distortion and, in the α chain, Fe-His bond tilting. These results support the tertiary two-state model of ligand binding (Henry et al., Biophys. Chem. 2002, 98, 149). Experimentally, the νFeHis evolution is faster for β than for α chains, and pump-probe rR spectroscopy in solution reveals an inflection in the νFeHis time course at 3 μs for β but not for α hemes, an interval previously shown to be the first step in the R-T transition. In the α chain νFeHis dropped sharply at 20 μs, the final step in the R-T transition. The time courses are fully consistent with recent computational mapping of the R-T transition via conjugate peak refinement by Karplus and co-workers (Fischer et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108, 5608). The effector molecule IHP was found to lower νFeHis selectively for α chains within the R state, and a binding site in the α1α2 cleft is suggested.
The use of hybrid hemoglobin (Hb), with mesoheme substituted for protoheme, allows separate monitoring of the α or β hemes along the allosteric pathway. Using resonance Raman (rR) spectroscopy in silica gel, which greatly slows protein motions, we have observed that the Fe-histidine stretching frequency, νFeHis, which is a monitor of heme reactivity, evolves between frequencies characteristic of the R and T states, for both α or β chains, prior to the quaternary R-T and T-R shifts. Computation of νFeHis, using QM/MM and the conformational search program PELE, produced remarkable agreement with experiment. Analysis of the PELE structures showed that the νFeHis shifts resulted from heme distortion and, in the α chain, Fe-His bond tilting. These results support the tertiary two-state model of ligand binding (Henry et al., Biophys. Chem. 2002, 98, 149). Experimentally, the νFeHis evolution is faster for β than for α chains, and pump-probe rR spectroscopy in solution reveals an inflection in the νFeHis time course at 3 μs for β but not for α hemes, an interval previously shown to be the first step in the R-T transition. In the α chain νFeHis dropped sharply at 20 μs, the final step in the R-T transition. The time courses are fully consistent with recent computational mapping of the R-T transition via conjugate peak refinement by Karplus and co-workers (Fischer et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108, 5608). The effector molecule IHP was found to lower νFeHis selectively for α chains within the R state, and a binding site in the α1α2 cleft is suggested.
From the earliest days
of Perutz’ crystal structures[1,2] and the celebrated
two-state ligation model of Monod, Changeux and
Wyman,[3] hemoglobin (Hb) has served as a
paradigm for allosteric systems. Our understanding of the complex
mechanism whereby the high-affinity R structure shifts to the low-affinity
T structure continues to advance through new experimental and computational
developments. This shift accounts for the cooperative release of O2 from the four subunits in the Hb tetramer, which is essential
to efficient delivery of O2 from the lungs to tissues.[4]Hb is a tetrameric protein, built as a
dimer of dimers, each containing
two different, though structurally similar chains, α and β.
Superposition of crystal structures shows that the R–T shift
mainly involves a rotation of the α1β1 dimer against α2β2, by ∼15°.[5] The main intersubunit contact changes are at
the α1β2 interface, specifically
contacts between opposing C helices and FG corners of the two chains
(Figure 1). These have been called the “hinge”
and “switch” contacts, the former involving a reorientation
and the latter a shifted interdigitation of the contacting residues.
We note that a range of R structures are seen in different crystal
structures of ligated Hb,[6] and the solution
structure is a dynamical ensemble of these structures.[7] However, the critical quaternary contacts are unaffected
by these variations.
Figure 1
Left: View of the interdimer α1β2 interface of T-state Hb (PDB code 1A3N),[8] emphasizing
the “allosteric core” (E and F helices and FG corner).
Critical H-bonds (highlighted dashes) at tertiary (A–E and
F–H helices) and quaternary (hinge and switch) contacts are
labeled. Top right: Visible absorption spectrum in the Soret band
of αpβm and αmβp hybrids decomposed into protoheme and mesoheme contributions,
showing the much greater absorptivity of protoheme at 440 nm (contribution
from vibronic side bands is in green; data from ref (9)). Lower right: Chain-selective
mesoheme substitution permits selective resonance Raman spectroscopy
(440 nm excitation) of protoheme in the low-frequency region for deoxy
HbA (black), αmβp (red) and αpβm (blue) Hb sol–gels. The positions
of the νFeHis and other heme bands are indicated.
Left: View of the interdimer α1β2 interface of T-state Hb (PDB code 1A3N),[8] emphasizing
the “allosteric core” (E and F helices and FG corner).
Critical H-bonds (highlighted dashes) at tertiary (A–E and
F–H helices) and quaternary (hinge and switch) contacts are
labeled. Top right: Visible absorption spectrum in the Soret band
of αpβm and αmβp hybrids decomposed into protoheme and mesoheme contributions,
showing the much greater absorptivity of protoheme at 440 nm (contribution
from vibronic side bands is in green; data from ref (9)). Lower right: Chain-selective
mesoheme substitution permits selective resonance Raman spectroscopy
(440 nm excitation) of protoheme in the low-frequency region for deoxyHbA (black), αmβp (red) and αpβm (blue) Hb sol–gels. The positions
of the νFeHis and other heme bands are indicated.An important recent finding is that the R–T
shift is not
concerted, but involves separate stages, with 3 and 20 μs time
constants, the first involving the “hinge” and the second
the “switch” contacts, as monitored by UVrR[10] and UV MCD[11] spectroscopies.
WAXS (wide-angle X-ray scattering) measurements[12] indicate that most of the molecular shape alteration occurs
in the first transition. These experimental observations strongly
support the two-stage quaternary pathway that has emerged from computational
mapping of the Hb energy landscape by Karplus and co-workers.[13] This pathway is not an interpolation between
the end-states, but instead, a succession of two separate rotations,
one involving the αβ dimers, and the other involving mainly
the α chains. The first carries most of the conformational change,
consistent with the WAXS results, and involves the “hinge”
contacts, while the second involves the “switch”.In addition to quaternary shifts, there are tertiary structural
differences within ligated and unligated subunits. These can be seen
in the crystal structures of the canonical R and T states, and also
of tetramers that have been trapped, via chemical or mutational modifications,
in partially ligated forms.[6] The occurrence
of tertiary changes along the allosteric pathway has been implicit
in many models of binding cooperativity. These include the Koshland–Nemethy–Filmer
“induced fit” model for successive binding steps,[14] and the “molecular code” model
of Ackers and co-workers, based on microstate thermodynamics derived
from extensive measurements of tetramer-dimer dissociation equilibria.[15] Tertiary as well as quaternary changes have
also been analyzed computationally, starting with Gelin and Karplus’
pioneering description of the “allosteric core”.[16] However, the structures of tertiary intermediates
remain to be defined, and are essential to a mechanistic understanding
of cooperativity. These are the focus of the present study.An important experimental development is the finding that tertiary
and quaternary changes can be separated in time by encapsulating Hb
in silica gel.[17] The protein retains function
in the gel, which permits access to buffer and to ligands,[18−20] but greatly slows protein motion, especially quaternary rearrangement.
The gels are transparent and permit application of optical spectroscopies.[17−25] By monitoring both UVrR and visible rR spectra, we have shown that
the Fe–histidine stretching frequency, νFeHis, undergoes
evolution between high- and low-reactivity values prior to the R–T
quaternary rearrangement, and vice versa in the reverse direction.
The Fe–His bond transmits force from the protein to the heme,
and its stretching frequency has been shown to reflect heme reactivity.[26] Evolution of νFeHis prior to changes in
the quaternary markers seen in UVrR spectra provided direct support
for the tertiary two-state model of Eaton and co-workers,[27] in which both high- and low-affinity tertiary
structures are accessible in either quaternary state. However, these
results represented the average behavior of the α and β
chains, which are known to have differing intrinsic νFeHis values.[9,17,28−30]In the
present work, we use a combined spectroscopic and computational
approach to probe the distinct conformational transitions experienced
by the α and β chains of Hb. In the spectroscopic work,
the two chains are monitored separately by using hybrid Hb’s,
in which the native protoheme is replaced with mesoheme in either
the α or β subunits. The shifted electronic transition
energy of the mesoheme permits selective excitation of the protohemerR spectrum.[9,28] We find that each chain evolves
between high and low νFeHis values. However, the extent of the
νFeHis change is greater in the α chains, while the β
chains evolve faster in the R–T direction. In solution, the
β chain progress curve shows an inflection coincident with the
“hinge” quaternary step, while the α chains evolve
in concert with the “switch”. These results are also
consistent with the computational mapping of Karplus and co-workers.[13]In the computational work, we apply the
PELE method[31] to predict the structural
evolution of the heme
and E and F helices of the α and β chains in response
to removal of CO from a single Hb subunit, with the quaternary structure
fixed in the R state. CO is a chemically stable surrogate for O2, inducing the same electronic and structural changes in the
heme.[32] We previously used this technique
together with a QM/MM treatment of the heme and its surroundings,
to successfully predict the helix displacements in myoglobin, Mb,
in response to heme deligation.[33] νFeHis
is calculated via QM/MM and normal-mode analysis, including benchmark
testing on myoglobin. Remarkably, PELE predicts an evolution from
high to low νFeHis, with the same shifts for each chain as those
observed in the gel experiments. In addition, the PELE structures
showed similar heme perturbations to those observed in the deoxyHb
(T state) crystal structure: out-of-plane distortions of the heme,
and, in the α chains, a tilted Fe–His bond. In other
respects, however, the intermediate structure is distinct from the
tertiary structure in deoxyHb. This result establishes the competency
of computational techniques to monitor force transmission between
the heme and the protein, and gives further insight into the allosteric
mechanism.
Methods
Experimental Section
Materials
Tetramethyl orthosilicate (TMOS), sodium
phosphate buffers, and IHP were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and
were of the highest purity available. Sodium dithionite (Aldrich)
was of technical grade, was stored in a desiccator, and was used within
six months of purchase. All solutions were prepared using Milli-Q
deionized water.The purification of humanHbA and its chain-selective
reconstitution with mesoheme has been described previously.[9] Briefly, Hb was isolated from expired human blood[32,34] and the heme was extracted by acetone-acid treatment.[35,36] The apoHb was then reconstituted and incubated for 3 days with synthetic
iron(III) mesoporphyrin IX.[28,35,36] The α and β chains of native HbA and mesoHb were then
isolated and purified by published procedures,[28,37−39] and α(proto)-β(meso) (αpβm) and α(meso)-β(proto) (αmβp) Hb tetramers were recombined by incubating
a 1.2-fold molar excess of the beta subunit with the corresponding
alpha subunit in 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, overnight at 4 °C
in a CO-containing environment, followed by cation exchange to remove
excess monomeric chains.[28,40−42] Samples were then treated with dithionite to ensure complete reduction
to the ferrous state, and were subject to gel-filtration chromatography
to remove any residual porphyrin. The proto/mesoheme content and concentration
of the hybrid Hb solutions were established by UV–vis absorbance,[43] and the molecular weights of the alpha and beta
chains were verified by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.
Hybrid Hb solutions were stored in the CO-bound form at −80
°C until use.
Sample Preparation
Sol–gel
encapsulation of
Hb was performed as described in our earlier study.[17] COHb solutions were converted to the oxy form by photolysis
on ice under 1 atm O2. These oxyHb solutions were then
used directly for oxyHb gels, or were converted to the deoxy form
by purging with Ar and adding ∼1 mM sodium dithionite for deoxyHb
gels. Equal volumes of TMOS and 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH
6.5) were then mixed in an NMR tube and vortexed until cloudy, at
which point a third volume (i.e., 1/3 of final total volume) of Hb
solution was added and the solution vortexed until homogeneous. The
sol–gel emulsion was then rotated horizontally until hardened
into a film on the inner surface of the sample tube, typically in
5–10 min. The gel was then bathed in O2- or Ar-saturated
phosphate buffer and stored in the dark at 4 °C for 48 h prior
to use, with one change of the bathing buffer (1 mL for 180 μL
of gel) after 24 h to remove methanol and nonencapsulated protein.
These steps were performed under ambient conditions for oxyHb gels
and under 1 atm Ar for deoxyHb gels. The final concentration of Hb
tetramers in the sol–gels was 100 μM (oxyHb) or 50 μM
(deoxyHb). The estimated ferric Hb subunits was <5% under these
conditions.[17] Conversion of oxyHb gels
to deoxyHb was initiated by adding sodium dithionite via needle to
a final concentration of ∼2 mM in the bathing buffer. Conversion
of deoxyHb gels to the CO-bound state was achieved by removing the
degassed bathing buffer and replacing it with CO-saturated buffer.Hb solution samples were prepared as described previously,[9] in 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, at a final
Hb concentration of 100 μM tetramer. About 400 μL of this
solution was transferred by cannula to a sealed, purged NMR tube under
1 atm CO or Ar pressure for COHb or deoxyHb samples, respectively.
Heme-rR Spectroscopy of Hybrid Hb Sol–Gels
Resonance
Raman spectra of Hb sol–gels were obtained using an experimental
apparatus described elsewhere.[17] Excitation
(440 nm) was obtained from the frequency-doubled output of a titanium-sapphire
laser (1 kHz, 20 ns pulse, 5 μJ/pulse) pumped by a Q-switched
(1 kHz), intracavity frequency-doubled Nd:yttrium–lithium–fluoride
laser (Photonics Industries International). Excitation light was focused
through a spherical lens onto the surface of the spinning sample tube,
and backscattered (135°) light was collected through a camera
lens and focused on the 0.200 mm entrance slit of a 0.8 m spectrometer
(Spex 1401) equipped with a liquid N2-cooled charge-coupled
device detector (Roper Scientific). A 442 nm cutoff notch filter (angle
tuned) was placed at the slit to minimize the spectral contribution
of Rayleigh scattering. For experiments on deoxyHb gels with added
CO, the sample tube was vertically translated back and forth through
an 8 mm zone (with a ∼100 μm laser spot size) at a rate
of 1 mm/s during spectral acquisition, using a Thorlabs APT motorized
stage (motor Z812). This step was found to be necessary to prevent
probe-beam photolysis from suppressing the T–R transition in
hybrid Hb sol–gels (data not shown). Experiments were conducted
at 22 ± 0.5 °C. Spectra were calibrated with respect to
standard Raman spectra of dimethylformamide and carbon tetrachloride,
and the νFeHis band was fit by a single Gaussian function and
a linear baseline in the 180–260 cm–1 region
of the spectrum. Error surface analysis on the νFeHis-derived
time constants of tertiary relaxation was performed as described by
Beechem and Haas[44] and our previous paper.[17]
Time-Resolved UVrR Spectroscopy and Heme-rR
of Hybrid Hb Solutions
The experimental setup and the spectral
acquisition scheme has
been described.[9,10] Photolysis pulses at 419 nm (20
ns, 65 μJ/pulse, 1 kHz) were generated by frequency doubling
the output of a Ti-sapphire laser, which was pumped (527 nm, ∼10
mJ/pulse, 70 ns, 1 kHz) by an intracavity frequency-doubled Nd:YLF
laser (GM30, Photonics International Inc.). Probe pulses (20 ns, 1
kHz) at 440 (0.5 μJ/pulse) or 229 (0.5–1 μJ/pulse)
nm were obtained by frequency doubling or quadrupling a second Ti-sapphire
laser. About 0.4 mL of sample solution was contained in a CO-saturated,
septum-sealed 5 mm quartz or glass NMR tube. The solution was stirred
via a stationary stirrer bar/magnet combination through spinning of
the sample tube. The timing between pump and probe pulses was adjusted
with a computer-controlled pulse generator (DG 535, Stanford Research
Systems). The data acquisition sequence subtracts averages of paired
readings, pump–probe minus probe–pump, in order to cancel
effects of slowly changing conditions.[45]For UVrR, the pump and probe beams were spatially overlapped
and focused to a rectangular spot on the sample, matched to the dimensions
of the detector, through a pair of cylindrical quartz lenses. Scattered
light was collected at 135° with a pair of fused quartz lenses,
f-matched to a 1.26 m spectrograph (Spex 1269) equipped with a holographic
grating (3600 groove mm–1) and UV enhanced liquid
nitrogen cooled CCD (back illuminated, Spec-10, Roper Scientific).
Spectra were obtained by averaging three 30 min measurements at each
time delay.For visible rR, the pump and probe beams were spatially
overlapped
and focused at the sample using a spherical lens. Scattered light
was collected at 135° with a camera lens (f # 1.2) and focused
using an f-matched singlet lens at the entrance slit of the 0.8 m
spectrograph equipped with a holographic grating (1800 groove mm–1) and intensified CCD (PI/MAX, Princeton Instruments).
The probe pulse wavelength, 440 nm, was selected to provide selective
resonance enhancement of protoheme in deoxy-HbA and deoxy-proto/meso-hybrids
(Figure 1). Interfering signals from the pump
laser were eliminated by electronically gating the detector. Spectra
were averaged for 4 min at each time delay.The spectral data
were processed with Grams/AI (7.0) software (Thermo
Galactic). The νFeHis band near 220 cm–1 was
fit with a Gaussian peak to obtain the center frequency. Examples
of the νFeHis spectra are presented in reference[9] for seven of the 20 pump–probe delay times plotted
in Figure 3. The time dependence of these deconvoluted
Fe–His stretching frequencies was modeled by a three-exponential
function with fixed time constants obtained from UVRR spectroscopy,
which tracks both tertiary and quaternary changes.
Figure 3
Time courses for νFeHis for the indicated subunit containing
protoheme in the αpβm (black) and
αmβp (red) hybrid Hbs, following
HbO2 deoxygenation in gels (top) or HbCO photodissociation
in solution (bottom). The effect of IHP addition (open squares) in
gels is also shown. Time courses for HbA (αpβp) under the same conditions are given as dashed lines for
comparison. Dotted horizontal lines indicate frequencies for unrelaxed
deoxy heme, after photolysis of HbO2 in gels, or of HbCO
in solution (bottom). Marked at right are the chain frequencies for
deoxyHb in gels (top) and solution (bottom). Dotted vertical lines
are labeled along the bottom axis showing time constants for tertiary
and quaternary contact changes.
Computational
Methods
Computer simulations involved
the following procedure: (1) systems setup for R, T and oxy/deoxyMb,
(2) initial conformational sampling using molecular dynamics (MD),
(3) QM/MM geometry optimization and frequency calculations, (4) PELE
sampling for the R deligated species, and (5) QM/MM geometry optimization
and frequency calculations for PELE’s intermediates.
System Setup
and Molecular Dynamics
The following structures
were taken from the Protein Data Bank: 1A3N[8] (T, deoxyHb), 1BBB[46] (R2, HbCO), 2 V1K[47] (deoxyMb) and 1MBO[48] (oxyMb), and prepared with Protein Preparation Wizard[49] in the Schrödinger suite of programs.
After appropriate solvation, neutralization and 0.15 M NaCl addition,
a short MD simulation was performed with Desmond[50] for each structure, in order to obtain some conformational
sampling. More in detail, the systems were equilibrated with Desmond’s
default protocol followed by a 1 ns NPT production phase at 300 K
(this short MD was intended to keep the initial quaternary/tertiary
arrangements). Along equilibration and short production, the Cα
RMSD from the initial crystal structures stays below 1.3 Å. The
OPLS-2005 force-field[51] and the SPCwater
model were used. The temperature was regulated with the Nose–Hoover
chain thermostat[52] with a relaxation time
of 1.0 ps, and the pressure was controlled with the Martyna–Tobias–Klein[53] barostat with isotropic coupling and a relaxation
time of 2.0 ps. The RESPA[54] integrator
was employed with bonded, near, and far time steps of 2.0, 2.0, and
6.0 fs, respectively. A 9 Å cutoff was used for nonbonded interactions
together with the smooth particle mesh Ewald method.[55] For each system, six snapshots, at times 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6,
0.8, and 1 ns were selected for the QM/MM study.
QM/MM Calculations
Structures were optimized followed
by frequency calculations using Qsite.[56] The heme, the proximal histidine and the sixth ligand (molecular
oxygen or carbon monoxide, if present) of a given chain subunit (either
α of β) were included in the QM region. The rest of the
subunit containing the QM region, the other chains and a 12 Å
water layer were treated classically (the remainder of the solvent
was removed). The MM minimization included the chain under study,
containing the QM region, plus all other residues within 5 Å.
The density functional method with the B3LYP[57−60] functional and the lacvp*[61] basis set was used for the quantum region, while
the OPLS-AA[51] force field was used for
the classical part. In the case of R and oxyMb, the sixth ligand was
removed after geometry optimization and reoptimized before frequency
calculation. In doing so, the five-coordinated Rα, Rβ, Tα, Tβ,
Mb and “oxy” Mb were obtained, allowing direct comparison
with the Raman data, which is limited to five-coordinate heme. Quintet
and singlet states were used for five- and six-coordinated heme, respectively.
As expected, along the QM/MM optimizations, there were no substantial
structural changes except for residues in direct contact with the
QM region. Thus, significant tertiary changes require a wider level
of sampling, which can be achieved with PELE as shown previously.[62,63] Additionally, a constrained R structure (R*) was modeled by keeping
all backbone frozen along the MM and QM minimization.
PELE Simulation
The five-coordinated Rα and Rβ states obtained after QM/MM geometry optimizations
were used as initial models for the PELE simulation, aiming to reproduce
tertiary changes that accompany deligation of HbCO. PELE involves
three moves, a protein backbone perturbation, side chain sampling
and minimization, in a Monte Carlo step. At the end of each step,
a Metropolis acceptance criterion is applied to accept or reject the
new conformation. The collection of accepted steps forms a stochastic
trajectory in the conformational space. The initial backbone move
is based on α-carbon (Cα) displacements according
to an anisotropic network model (ANM), a simple model for normal-mode
analysis.[64] During side chain sampling,
the algorithm proceeds by optimally arranging the top 25 “hot”
side chains, those with the largest increase in energy as a result
of the Cα-ANM perturbation. Finally a truncated Newton
minimization, using the OPLS all-atom force field[51] and an implicit surface-generalized Born continuum solvent,[64] is performed to obtain a new local structure.
Along this minimization, Cα atoms are constrained
to their final position obtained in the ANM perturbation. Additionally,
side chain perturbation and the implicit solvent model introduce also
entropic contributions, moving away from a minimum energy pathway.
We have recently shown that this level of sampling provides accurate
binding free energies.[65] Importantly, the
Cα-ANM perturbation was applied only to the chain
under study. Furthermore, only residues within 25 Å of the heme
were minimized in order to avoid quaternary rearrangement of the tetramer,
while allowing relaxation of the intersubunit interface. Some intermediates
generated by PELE were than subjected to QM/MM geometry optimization
and frequency calculation to track the dependence on heme reactivity
on tertiary changes.
Cross-Correlation Analysis
A normalized
covariance
matrix, C, of the Cα positional fluctuations along the PELE trajectory was
calculated to assess the extent of correlation between the residues
within a given subunit. C is given bywhere
ΔR is the displacement
vector of the i-th atom from its average position
along the trajectory and the angle
brackets represent an average over the ensemble of structures generated. C ranges from +1 to −1.
Positive values represent correlated motion (i.e., in the same direction),
whereas negative values represent an anticorrelated motion (i.e.,
in opposite directions). Null values indicate no correlation (i.e.,
motion in orthogonal directions).
Results
UVrR Spectra
Establish Kinetic Competency of Meso/Proto-Hb Hybrids
While
mesoheme is a close analogue of protoheme, the electronic
and steric effects of saturating the vinyl substituents do have detectable
effects on function in the reconstituted hybrid hemoglobins. Relative
to native HbA, the meso/proto hybrids have slightly higher O2 affinities, and slightly lower cooperativity.[66−69] Consequently we were concerned
about the integrity of the protein structure, and used UVrR spectroscopy
to confirm that both hybrids in fact retain the key quaternary contacts,
and also the conformational kinetics of HbA.Excitation at 229
nm produced spectra for deoxyHb and HbCO with the same tyrosine and
tryptophan band frequencies and intensities for the hybrids and HbA,
and subtraction gives identical difference spectra (Figure S1, Supporting Information). This difference spectrum
is known to result from the breaking of key H-bonds at the hinge and
switch intersubunit contacts (Figure 1) when
the T structure is converted to R.[10,70,71]Pump–probe UVrR difference spectroscopy
has shown that these
quaternary contacts are formed in two successive time steps following
ligand photodissociation from HbCO, first the hinge (2 μs) and
then the switch (20 μs).[10] We found
(Figure 2) that the difference spectra were
identical for the hybrids and HbA at 3.0 and 50 μs, before and
after the switch contact is formed. Likewise identical spectra were
obtained at 0.15 μs, following the first detectable tertiary
transition (0.07 μs)[10,70−72] and before the quaternary movements. This difference spectrum is
associated with the breaking of interhelical H-bonds due to the concerted
motion of the E and F helices.[33,72,73]
Figure 2
Pump–probe difference
spectra at the indicated delay times,
reflecting alterations in tertiary (0.15 μs) and quaternary
(3 and 50 μs) H-bonds,[10] which reveal
the same dynamics for HbA and the Hb hybrids.
Thus, despite the slight functional alteration associated
with
substitution of meso- for protoheme, the conformational dynamics,
as monitored by UVrR spectroscopy, remain unaffected.Pump–probe difference
spectra at the indicated delay times,
reflecting alterations in tertiary (0.15 μs) and quaternary
(3 and 50 μs) H-bonds,[10] which reveal
the same dynamics for HbA and the Hb hybrids.
Nanosecond–Microsecond νFeHis Evolution in Aqueous
Hybrids
The mesoheme Soret absorption band is blue-shifted
relative to that of protoheme, so that in meso/proto hybrids, one
can achieve selective excitation of protohemerR modes (Figure 1).[74,75] We have previously exploited
this characteristic to monitor the evolution of the Fe–histidine
stretching mode frequency, νFeHis, separately in the α
and β chains, after CO photodissociation from aqueous HbCO,
using pump–probe rR spectroscopy.[9] In the previous work, νFeHis spectra are shown for seven time
points corresponding to important UVrR changes. In the present work,
we show the full time course and reanalyzed these data, using curve-fitting
to extract the band frequency at each time point. The νFeHis
time-course is plotted in Figure 3, for comparison with the gel data (see below).
Comparable data for native Hb (dotted line)[17] is seen to be an intensity-weighted average of the two chains, confirming
that the hybrids provide a faithful representation of the Fe–histidine
dynamics in the native protein. The νFeHis intensity is greater
for α than for β chains (Figure 1); thus the Hb data are closer to those of the α than the β
chains.Time courses for νFeHis for the indicated subunit containing
protoheme in the αpβm (black) and
αmβp (red) hybrid Hbs, following
HbO2 deoxygenation in gels (top) or HbCO photodissociation
in solution (bottom). The effect of IHP addition (open squares) in
gels is also shown. Time courses for HbA (αpβp) under the same conditions are given as dashed lines for
comparison. Dotted horizontal lines indicate frequencies for unrelaxed
deoxyheme, after photolysis of HbO2 in gels, or of HbCO
in solution (bottom). Marked at right are the chain frequencies for
deoxyHb in gels (top) and solution (bottom). Dotted vertical lines
are labeled along the bottom axis showing time constants for tertiary
and quaternary contact changes.νFeHis evolves differently in the two chains, as noted
previously.[9] The α chain value is
nearly constant at
early times, but drops dramatically at ∼20 μs, coincident
with the formation of the final quaternary contact (switch),[10] after which it descends to the value seen in
deoxyHb (Figure 1; this value is somewhat arbitrary,
as the deoxyHb band is asymmetric, and has two components ∼204
and ∼214 cm–1).[9,28−30,76] The β chain νFeHis
begins its decline earlier than the α chain, although the final
value is considerably higher, as it is in deoxyHb (Figure 1). There is a clear inflection in the β chain
time course at ∼3 μs, coincident with formation of the
first quaternary contact (hinge).[10]
Prompt
Evolution of νFeHis after Ligand Dissociation
It has
long been known that HbCO photodissociation produces a prompt
deoxy-hemerR spectrum with significantly elevated νFeHis, relative
to that observed at later times.[70,77−80] We have previously attributed this elevation to Fe–His bond
compression due to protein resistance to heme relaxation after the
Fe–CO bond breaks,[70] an effect confirmed
by the computational results described below.However, the reported
frequency of this prompt signal has been somewhat variable. We discovered
that one reason for this variability is that the measured frequency
decreases with the increasing incident laser power. Figure 4 shows the power-dependent νFeHis values obtained
from rR spectra produced by our 16 ns laser pulses (which act as simultaneous
pump and probe). At low power levels only a fraction of the HbCO is
photodissociated; this fraction (calculated from the normalized intensity
ratio of the separate ν4 porphyrin bands of deoxy
and CO-heme[9,80]) is also plotted in Figure 4. The νFeHis values were determined by Guassian
peak fitting, after subtraction of the CO-heme spectrum (there is
a weak 238 cm–1 CO-heme band), using the isolated
508 cm–1 Fe–CO stretching band[81] for normalization. At 1 μJ/pulse, where
the photolyzed fraction is <5%, νFeHis = 228.5 cm–1, but drops rapidly to a plateau value of 225.5 cm–1 beyond 5 μJ/pulse. Importantly, this effect is much weaker
for myoglobin (Mb), which shows only a 1 cm–1 initial
drop, to 220.5 cm–1, which is the equilibrium deoxyMb
value. An even larger νFeHis difference between Hb and Mb was
reported by Mizutani and Nagai,[82,83] using picosecond pump–probe
spectroscopy. A few ps after HbCO photolysis, νFeHis was 232
cm–1 for Hb, while for Mb it was 221 cm–1.
Figure 4
νFeHis (filled circles) and CO saturation (open circles)
in HbCO (black) and MbCO (red) solutions, as functions of the incident
16 ns laser pulse energy.
νFeHis (filled circles) and CO saturation (open circles)
in HbCO (black) and MbCO (red) solutions, as functions of the incident
16 ns laser pulse energy.Thus, there is a protein-specific νFeHis elevation
in the
prompt HbCO photoproduct, which remains largely conserved out to 16
ns (our laser pulse width). Our nanosecond pump–probe data
gave νFeHis = 224 cm–1 at the earliest time
point, 70 ns (Figure 3), slightly lower than
the 225.5 cm–1, obtained within the 16 ns pump pulse
at laser power levels above 5 μJ/pulse. The pump power exceeds
this value in the pump–probe experiments, in order to photolyze
all of the HbCO molecules. Consequently, most of the frequency drop
at early times is attributable to the laser power effect. We attribute
this effect to relaxation of the heme pocket due to energy transfer
from multiple excitations of the heme chromophore. The effect is not
seen for Mb because full relaxation of its heme occurs in picoseconds.
We infer that the heme pocket is considerably more constrained in
Hb than in Mb, retarding heme relaxation into the nanosecond time
regime.
Hybrid νFeHis Evolution in Silica Gel
As in our
study of native Hb embedded in silica gel,[17] the protoheme νFeHis evolution of the hybrid Hb’s was
monitored in the R–T and T–R directions by deoxygenating
gel-encapsulated HbO2 (R–T), and by adding CO to
gel-encapsulated deoxyHb (T–R). Figure 3 shows that in the R–T direction νFeHis falls to the
final deoxyHb values within 2 days for both the α and β
chains, whereas the UVrR markers of quaternary change were previously
found to become detectable only after a week.[17] The final values are, of course, quite different in the two chains,
as they are in equilibrium deoxyHb.[9,28] The corresponding
gel data for native Hb (dashed line)[17] tracks
the α chain data more closely than the β chain data, as
in solution. In addition, the Hb time course showed an early phase
(τ = 0.1 h), which is missing in the hybrids. The starting νFeHis
in the hybrids is that of the second Hb phase (τ = 3 h). This
difference between native Hb and the hybrids is not seen in solution
(Figure 3, bottom). We infer that the gel slightly
perturbs the local heme environment in the hybrids, allowing the hemes
to relax further than they do in native Hb at the earliest times.The T–R direction (Figure 5) is induced
in gels by adding CO to encapsulated deoxyHb just prior to data collection.
The rR probe beam transiently photodissociates bound CO to produce
the five-coordinate heme complex required for νFeHis detection.
Consequently, the 16 ns, 5 μJ laser pulses used in this experiment
probe unrelaxed heme in the photoproduct, as discussed above, and
therefore, the measured νFeHis values are expected to be elevated
from those seen in the R–T gels. If roughly 6 to 7 cm–1 is subtracted from the T–R frequencies, then νFeHis
evolution is seen to be just the reverse of the R–T direction
(Figure 3), with α chains starting out
at somewhat lower frequencies than β chains in deoxyHb, and
converging to similar R state deoxy frequencies. These results are
mirrored in encapsulated native Hb,[17] where
νFeHis rises to values characteristic of the R state photoproduct
(measured in HbCO gel) within 2 days. In both hybrids and native Hb,
these events occur long before the full establishment of the UVrR
markers of the T–R quaternary transition.[17]
Figure 5
Time courses
for protoheme νFe–His in the αpβm (top panel) and αmβp (bottom
panel) hybrid Hbs following addition of CO to deoxyHb
gels. The addition of IHP (open squares) has only a minor effect,
as shown. The insets are examples of rR νFeHis peaks for selected
-IHP time points. Fitted time courses are shown as solid lines. (The
first αpβm time point was excluded
from the fit.).
Adding the effector molecule
IHP (inositol hexaphosphate) was previously
found to strongly affect νFeHis in the R–T direction.[17] The current results show that this effect is
largely localized in the α chains. The initial value of νFeHis
is strongly depressed in the α chains, and the depression is
maintained throughout the time course, whereas the effect on the β
chains is minimal. In the T–R direction, there is little effect
of IHP on either chain.The time courses could be fit to two
or three successive exponentials.
Time constants and amplitudes are given in Table 1. Figure S2 (Supporting Information) shows the error surface analysis used to determine uncertainties.
Table 1
Time Constants
for νFeHis Relaxation
from Sol–Gel Vis-rR Spectraa
τ1, h
τ2, h
oxyHb −O2
αpβm -IHP
4.1 (5.5 cm–1)b
26 (2.6 cm–1)
αpβm +IHP
0.63 (2.7 cm–1)b
25 (3.6 cm–1)
αmβp -IHP
0.8 (1.5 cm–1)b
13.9 (1.1 cm–1)
αmβp +IHP
0.6 (1.1 cm–1)b
22 (1.2 cm–1)
deoxyHb +CO (photoproduct)
αpβm -IHP
0.15 (1.9 cm–1)
3.6 (3.1 cm–1)
αpβm +IHP
0.33 (1.5 cm–1)
3.8 (2.9 cm–1)
αmβp -IHP
0.23 (1.7 cm–1)
7.2 (1.7 cm–1)
αmβp +IHP
0.37 (1.5 cm–1)
8.8 (1.4 cm–1)
The amplitudes
are given in parentheses.
Amplitude includes an unresolved
rapid phase.
Time courses
for protoheme νFe–His in the αpβm (top panel) and αmβp (bottom
panel) hybrid Hbs following addition of CO to deoxyHb
gels. The addition of IHP (open squares) has only a minor effect,
as shown. The insets are examples of rR νFeHis peaks for selected
-IHP time points. Fitted time courses are shown as solid lines. (The
first αpβm time point was excluded
from the fit.).The amplitudes
are given in parentheses.Amplitude includes an unresolved
rapid phase.
Computation
Produces Accurate Variations in νFeHis for
Equilibrium Structures
QM/MM computation on equilibrium deoxyMb
and deoxyHb structures (Table 2), gave reasonable
values for the Fe–His bond distances and the νFeHis frequencies.
The computed frequencies are somewhat below the experimental values
(4 cm–1 for deoxyMb, 14 cm–1 for
deoxyHb). Importantly, however, the 7 cm–1 frequency
difference between the β and α chains in deoxyHb is in
quantitative agreement with the experimental difference.
Table 2
Average QM/MM Fe–His Bond Distances
(d) and Stretching Frequencies (νFeHis) for
Five-Coordinated α (Rα and Tα) and β (Rβ and Tβ) Hb Subunits,
DeoxyMb and MbO2 (with Removal of O2)a
structure
d, Å
νFeHis,
cm–1
νFeHis,
cm–1 (expt.)c
R*α
2.132
223
224d
R*β
2.140
220
224d
Rα
2.20(1)b
213(2)b
220
Tα
2.24(1)b
197(2)b
212
Rβ
2.22(1)b
210(2)b
221
Tβ
2.21(1)b
204(2)b
218
oxyMb
2.19(2)b
217(2)b
Mb
2.17(1)b
216(4)b
220e
Relevant experimental values
are also shown.
Values averaged
over six snapshots
taken from the 1 ns molecular dynamics simulation. The number in parentheses
is the uncertainty of the mean, estimated as σ/N1/2, where σ is the standard deviation and N is the number of values used to calculate the mean values
(6).
Experimental data from
rR of sol–gel
encapsulated Hbs.
OxyHb
photoproduct values.
Sol–gel
encapsulated deoxyMb
from Samuni et al.[84]
Relevant experimental values
are also shown.Values averaged
over six snapshots
taken from the 1 ns molecular dynamics simulation. The number in parentheses
is the uncertainty of the mean, estimated as σ/N1/2, where σ is the standard deviation and N is the number of values used to calculate the mean values
(6).Experimental data from
rR of sol–gel
encapsulated Hbs.OxyHb
photoproduct values.Sol–gel
encapsulated deoxyMb
from Samuni et al.[84]When the oxyMb structure was reoptimized
after removal of the ligand,
the computed νFeHis was essentially the same as for the deoxyMb
structure. Thus, the starting protein structure has no effect on the
deoxy-heme in Mb. However, this is not the case for Hb. Both the α
and β chains give elevated values, compared to those of deoxyHb,
when the HbCO structure is deligated. As observed experimentally,
the elevation is much larger for the α than for the β
chains, 16 vs 6 cm–1, respectively. These differences
are similar to those seen for the meso/proto hybrid Hb’s over
the deligation time course in the solution pump–probe experiments
(Figure 2; the differences seen in the gels
are somewhat lower, because of prompt relaxation at early times, as
discussed above). In order to verify that these results are not biased
by the initial structure, we repeated the calculations with 2dn1 (R,
oxyHb) and 2dn2 (T, deoxyHb).[85] As expected,
the frequency values obtained with these crystals are comparable (the
R–T shifts are 11 and 7 cm–1 in α and
β respectively).Interestingly, when the protein backbone
was kept frozen during
geometry optimization of deligated Hb, we obtained significantly higher
frequencies in both chains, shown as R* in Table 2. This difference, 10 cm–1, is the same
as that observed between HbCO and MbCO in the 2 ps photodissociation
experiments of Mizutani and Nagai.[82,83] The corresponding
Fe–His distance is shorter than in the fully optimized structure,
2.13 vs 2.20 Å for the α chains, and 2.14 vs 2.22 Å
for the β chains, and only slightly longer than in the initial
6-coordinate CO-heme adduct, 2.12 Å. Thus, modeling an unrelaxed
subunit structure confirms our earlier conjecture:[70] the elevated νFeHis observed for early HbCO photoproduct
results from bond compression associated with protein resistance to
heme relaxation. Together, these results show that the QM/MM methodology
is sufficiently accurate to monitor the evolution of the individual
chain frequencies following deligation.
Computational Modeling
of νFeHis Evolution in α
and β Chains
When PELE is applied to a single deligated
chain within the HbCO structure the computed νFeHis decreases,
just as it does in the time-resolved rR experiments. Moreover, the
effect is greater for the α than the β chains, again as
observed experimentally.Table 3 shows
the νFeHis trend with successive PELE steps. Twenty steps are
sufficient to reach a value around which it subsequently fluctuates.
This value is essentially the same as that computed for the T structure,
197 and 204 cm–1 for the α and β chains.
Thus, in striking agreement with the gel experiments, νFeHis
evolves from the R-state to the T-state values, solely as a result
of tertiary forces initiated by deligation, in the absence of quaternary
change.
Table 3
Evolution of Structure and the QM/MM-Derived
νFeHis of the Deligated α and β Subunits during
the PELE Simulation
α
chain
β chain
step
νFeHisa
db
θc
RMSDTd
RMSDRe
νFeHisa
db
θc
RMSDTd
RMSDRe
R*
223
2.132
92.0
–
–
220
2.140
92.3
–
–
R
213
2.198
94.6
1.59
0.00
215
2.194
96.4
3.68
0.00
1
210
2.212
99.4
1.62
0.77
213
2.191
100.7
3.77
0.84
10
205
2.233
102.1
1.48
0.74
203
2.201
96.9
3.67
0.88
20
200
2.232
104.5
1.46
0.93
204
2.199
100.0
3.68
0.94
30
199
2.234
103.2
1.53
0.87
204
2.200
98.8
3.70
0.80
40
201
2.218
102.4
1.46
0.88
205
2.209
98.4
3.65
0.90
50
195
2.251
105.0
1.45
0.89
206
2.199
101.0
3.69
0.82
T
197(2)
2.24(1)
102(2)
0.00
1.59
204(2)
2.21(1)
102(2)
0.00
3.68
Fe–His
stretching frequency
(cm–1).
Fe–His bond length (Å).
Heme-His tilting angle (“C”
pyrrole nitrogen–iron–His Nε angle in degrees).
RMSD of α carbon displacements
(Å) between the PELE intermediate and the deoxyHb crystal structure
(1A3N)[8] for the α1 (left)
or β1 (right) subunits.
RMSD of α carbon displacements
(Å) between the PELE intermediate and the initial R structure
for the α1 (left) or β1 (right)
subunits.
Fe–His
stretching frequency
(cm–1).Fe–His bond length (Å).Heme-His tilting angle (“C”
pyrrolenitrogen–iron–His Nε angle in degrees).RMSD of α carbon displacements
(Å) between the PELE intermediate and the deoxyHb crystal structure
(1A3N)[8] for the α1 (left)
or β1 (right) subunits.RMSD of α carbon displacements
(Å) between the PELE intermediate and the initial R structure
for the α1 (left) or β1 (right)
subunits.However, the tertiary
structure itself does not evolve very far
in the direction of the tertiary structure found in the T state. For
each chain, the root-mean square deviation (RMSD) between the evolving
PELE structures and the initial deligated structure never exceeds
0.94 Å (Table 3). The RMSD between the
initial structure and the structure in the T state is much larger,
1.59 and 3.68 Å in the α and β chains. More importantly,
the RMSD of successive PELE structures relative to the T state diminishes
very little from these values, fluctuating around 1.47 Å (α)
and 3.67 (β) (Table 3). It is clear that
the PELE intermediates, although displaying νFeHis frequencies
characteristics of the T state, have protein conformations that are
distinct from the T conformations. The factors controlling νFeHis
must therefore be of local nature.For the same reason stated
above, the calculations were repeated
with 2dn1 and 2dn2 crystal structures.
Consistently, νFeHis shifted after PELE from 210 to 199 cm–1 for the α chain, and from 212 to 206 cm–1 in the β chain.
Structural Determinants
of νFeHis Evolution from Computational
Modeling
In searching for local determinants of νFeHis,
we found that two structural parameters of the heme were most consistently
correlated (Figure 6) in the successive PELE
steps: the Fe–His bond length, and the out-of-plane distortion
of the heme, measured as the average displacement of heme’s
atoms from their least-squares plane.[86] Both parameters have been directly related to oxygen affinity by
quantum mechanical calculations.[87,88]
Figure 6
Dependence
of the computed Fe–His stretching frequency (values
in cm–1) on the Fe–His bond distance and
tilt angle (NC–Fe–Nε angle, where NC is in heme pyrrole “C” and Nε is in the
proximal histidine), and with the heme out-of-plane distortion (measured
as the average displacement of heme’s atoms from their least-squares
plane), for Hb α chains (red diamonds) and β chains (blue
circles).
Dependence
of the computed Fe–His stretching frequency (values
in cm–1) on the Fe–His bond distance and
tilt angle (NC–Fe–Nε angle, where NC is in hemepyrrole “C” and Nε is in the
proximal histidine), and with the heme out-of-plane distortion (measured
as the average displacement of heme’s atoms from their least-squares
plane), for Hb α chains (red diamonds) and β chains (blue
circles).For the α chains, the frequency
also correlates with the
tilt angle of the Fe–His bond with respect to the heme plane
(Figure 6, bottom). This angle is as large
in the PELE intermediate as it is in the T state, 102°, while
the Fe–His bond is nearly normal to the heme (92°) in
HbCO. Friedman and co-workers linked νFeHis to the Fe–His
bond tilt within a general model for allostery.[78,80] A tilted Fe–His bond has long been noted as a feature of
the T-state α chain.[5,89] However, this correlation
does not hold for the β chain, for which the tilt is lower along
the PELE trajectory. In the β chain, the heme distortion, enforced
by the packing interactions with nearby side chains, is the likely
determinant of the slight Fe–His bond lengthening.Figure 7 illustrates the differing heme-associated
changes between the two chains, and the similar local structures in
the PELE intermediate and deoxyHb.
Figure 7
Overlay of heme, the proximal histidine,
and relevant contacting
residues for the initial (light brown) and intermediate (green) PELE
structures, and for deoxyHb (PDB 1A3N;[8] cyan).
Overlay of heme, the proximal histidine,
and relevant contacting
residues for the initial (light brown) and intermediate (green) PELE
structures, and for deoxyHb (PDB 1A3N;[8] cyan).To investigate the origin of these
structural differences between
the evolving α and β chains, we turned to correlation
analysis. The Cα correlation maps between the PELE
intermediate and the initial structure show quite different patterns
for the two chains (Figure 8). In the α
chains, the displacements are positively correlated for the first
75 residues (A, B, C and E helices and the EF corner), but they correlate
poorly with the next 25 residues, which contain the F and part of
the G helices. In particular the correlation between the E (55–70)
and F (75–90) helices is essentially null, meaning that they
move in orthogonal directions. In contrast, the E and F helix displacements
are positively correlated in the β chains, while the E and B
helices are anticorrelated with the A helix.
Figure 8
Covariance matrix for successive residue Cα displacements
along the trajectory between initial and intermediate PELE structures.
The bar at the right shows the color scale from positive (white) to
negative (black) correlation. Orthogonal movements result in correlations
with values near 0.0 (green). Successive helices are indicated by
black bars with letter labels.
Figure 9 illustrates the differing displacements
of the E and F helices, which sandwich the heme group. Two orientations
are shown, in the EF plane (left), and perpendicular to it (right),
with the hemes superposed. In the β chain, the E and F helices
move in the same direction between the initial (light brown) and intermediate
(green) PELE structures, toward the protein exterior (right view)
and also toward the EF corner (left view). However, they move oppositely
in the α chain, the F helix again moving out and toward the
EF corner, while the E helix moves in and away from the EF corner.
This difference may be partly due to packing constraints in the EF
corner, which are more pronounced for the β chain (represented
in Figure 9 by the Pheβ85 and Leuβ81
side chains) than for the α chain. In addition, the H helix
may play a role, via H-bonds from the penultimate residue, Tyrα140
and Tyrβ145 to the F helix residues Proα77 and Valβ98,
respectively, and salt-bridges from Gluα116 and Gluβ121
to the A helix residues Lysα16 and Lysβ17, respectively.
Indeed, these regions are significantly correlated in the α
chain (Figure 8). The differing orientations
of these connections (Figure 9) may guide the
E and F helices in different directions, as reflected in the E and
A helices being correlated for the α chains but anticorrelated
in the β chains.
Figure 9
Ribbon diagram of the E and F helices for the PELE intermediate
(green helices; Valα62/β67 in cyan) and initial (light
brown helices; Valα62/β67 in orange) structures with hemes
superposed. The remaining helices are represented by cylinders. Also
shown are packing residues (blue) at the EF corner, and residues (magenta)
forming key interhelical H-bonds and salt-bridges.
Covariance matrix for successive residue Cα displacements
along the trajectory between initial and intermediate PELE structures.
The bar at the right shows the color scale from positive (white) to
negative (black) correlation. Orthogonal movements result in correlations
with values near 0.0 (green). Successive helices are indicated by
black bars with letter labels.In the β chain, the concerted helix displacements lead
to
steric contacts with the heme that induce out-of-plane distortions,
especially Pheβ103, which presses against one of the pyrrole
rings (Figure 7). This residue was identified
in earlier QM/MM computations as making an important contribution
to T–Roxygen affinity difference in Hb.[90] Corresponding contacts are attenuated in the α chain,
although the α heme also distorts, perhaps due to contacts of
the peripheral substituents. Displacements of the heme are strongly
correlated with those of the E helix in the β chain, but less
so for the α chain (Figure S3, Supporting
Information).In the α chain, the orthogonal motion
of the E and F helices
induces tilting of the Fe–His bond, due to the proximal His
residue, Hisα87, becoming displaced relative to the heme. We
found that the tilting is largely mediated by the H-bond connecting
Hisα87 with the backbone carbonyl of the upstream residue, Leuα83
(see Figure 7). When the strength of this H-bond
was lowered in silico, by reducing the atomic charge of the donor
(from 0.42 to 0.1) and increasing that of the acceptor (from −0.5
to −0.1), the Fe–His tilt was reduced by half. An important
role of this H-bond in regulation of oxygen affinity has previously
been found for other globins and on the basis of computational studies.[87]Ribbon diagram of the E and F helices for the PELE intermediate
(green helices; Valα62/β67 in cyan) and initial (light
brown helices; Valα62/β67 in orange) structures with hemes
superposed. The remaining helices are represented by cylinders. Also
shown are packing residues (blue) at the EF corner, and residues (magenta)
forming key interhelical H-bonds and salt-bridges.
Discussion
A central issue in understanding
allostery is to establish the
connection between function and structure, both tertiary and quaternary.
For hemoglobin, crystallography has established allosteric end-state
structures, as well as structures of variants and derivatives which
plausibly represent intermediate states on the allosteric pathway.[6] However, the details of this pathway, and the
forces that guide the protein along it, remain to be determined.In this work, we focus on the frequency of the Fe–His stretching
vibration as a monitor of heme reactivity. Ligation of heme by O2, or by its surrogate CO, requires Fe to be drawn into the
heme plane from its out-of-plane position in deoxy-heme. Forces that
retard this motion lower the binding affinity. They also weaken the
Fe–His bond in deoxy-heme, and lower its vibrational frequency.
νFeHis has been correlated with the affinities[26] and binding rates[91] of ligands
in various Hb preparations. In addition, we have shown[17] that the HbCO photolysis yield declines in parallel
with increasing νFeHis of the photoproduct as T-state Hb gels
evolve toward the R state; the decline in yield reflects a corresponding
increase in the rate of geminate recombination.Heme reactivity
is the not the sole determinant of ligand affinity,
as is clearly seen in the differing νFeHis for α and β
chains, despite their having essentially the same O2 affinities.[92] On the basis of early crystal structures, Perutz
proposed that oxygen affinity is reduced in T-state β chains
by movement of the E helix residues His(E7) and Val(E11) over the
hemeiron.[89] Removal of steric hindrance
with His(E7)Gly and Val(E11)Ala mutations confirmed this idea for
β chains.[93,94] These same mutations in α
chains showed that crowding of the binding site is relatively unchanged
between the R and T states,[95] indicating
a dominant role for proximal control of affinity.[92,95]A high level of Fe–His strain for T-state α chains
was initially found by the appearance of spectral signatures of pentacoordinate
heme upon reaction of NO, which exerts a strong trans effect, with
Hb stabilized in the T state.[96−98] The assignment of α-specific
rupture of the Fe–His bond was later confirmed in crystallographic
studies.[99] In another approach, Barrick
et al. severed the heme-protein link by replacing the proximal histidine,
His(F8), with glycine and adding imidazole to serve as the proximal
ligand.[100] Binding of CO to these constructs
fully disrupted the T-state quaternary contacts when the link was
severed only in the β chains, but not when it was severed only
in the α chains. Thus, the proximal linkage in the α but
not the β chains is critical to the T–R transition, consistent
with the greater proximal effect on heme reactivity in the α
chains. Barrick et al. also reported that CO affinity is controlled
entirely by proximal effects in α chains.[100]The compensation of heme reactivity and steric factors
produce
similar oxygen equilibria for both chains; chain equivalence is a
fundamental requirement for maximum cooperativity in binding to the
tetramer.[92] This compensation is illuminated
by our previous QM/MM computation of the structural factors contributing
to the ligation energy differences between the R and T states.[90] When protein constraints were relaxed in silico,
the contribution of the proximal imidazole to T-state destabilization
of the heme-CO adduct was found to be 1.3 kcal/mol greater in the
α than the β chains (consistent with the νFeHis
shifts reported here) while the contribution of the heme plus the
CO (reflecting nonbonded contacts) was 1.4 kcal/mol greater in the
β than the α chains, suggesting compensation between proximal
strain and nonbonded forces (see Supporting Information Table S3 in
ref (90)).Here,
we monitor the evolution of νFeHis, an indicator of
heme reactivity, independently for each chain through the R/T conformational
evolution and likewise find a larger effect in the α chain.
Although we cannot monitor steric factors spectroscopically, it is
likely that they evolve in concert with the observed νFeHis
shifts, due to the associated E helix motions, as discussed below.
Figure 10 provides a summary of νFeHis
values in various deligated states: the photoproduct, prior to local
relaxation; the R state and the T state for each chain; and the effect
of adding IHP.
Figure 10
Schematic diagram of νFeHis values (gel data) following
HbCO
photolysis. The value is elevated in the prompt photoproduct (R*,
top right) because of FeHis bond compression. Relaxation of the local
environment permits heme relaxation in the R state (lower left) with
similar νFeHis values in the two chains. In the T state (lower
right), νFeHis is lowered markedly in the α chains due
to Fe–His tilting. IHP has a large effect on νFeHis for
the α, but not the β chains in the R state or either chain
in the T state.
Schematic diagram of νFeHis values (gel data) following
HbCO
photolysis. The value is elevated in the prompt photoproduct (R*,
top right) because of FeHis bond compression. Relaxation of the local
environment permits heme relaxation in the R state (lower left) with
similar νFeHis values in the two chains. In the T state (lower
right), νFeHis is lowered markedly in the α chains due
to Fe–His tilting. IHP has a large effect on νFeHis for
the α, but not the β chains in the R state or either chain
in the T state.
Tertiary Structure Controls
Heme Reactivity within the Tetramer
Our previous gel encapsulation
study of native HbA established
that, following ligation or deligation, νFeHis evolved to values
characteristic of the eventual quaternary structure, R or T, well
before the quaternary transition itself took place.[17] The present work extends these results to the individual
chains, α and β, which evolve separately to the eventual
R and T νFeHis values, prior to the quaternary transition. Furthermore,
these observations are supported by computational modeling where protein
relaxation following deligation in one chain is coupled with QM/MM
frequency calculations. Along the simulations, the other three chains
remain ligated, and the quaternary structure remains R. For both α
and β chains, the QM/MM-computed νFeHis decreases by a
similar amount to that observed in the gel experiments.Together,
these results establish that heme reactivity is controlled exclusively
by tertiary forces within the Hb tetramer. Once the ligand is bound
or released, the tertiary forces induce a structure change that switches
the reactivity to the high and low values that have classically been
associated with the R and T states. Subsequently, the subunits rearrange
to the R and T quaternary structures.The local forces initiated
by ligation and deligation of the heme
are readily understood. The downward displacement of the Fe atom as
it loses the ligand and becomes 5-coordinate and high-spin, impels
displacement of the F-helix, to which the proximal histidine ligand
is attached. Resistance to this displacement can be seen in the elevated
νFeHis frequency of the immediate CO-heme photoproduct; this
frequency elevation is well modeled in the present QM/MM calculation
where we constrained the backbone motion. Releasing this constraint
lowers νFeHis by 10 cm–1, due to the relief
of Fe–His bond compression. This lowering is the same as the
νFeHis difference seen experimentally between the immediate
photoproducts for HbCO and MbCO.[9,26,70,82] For Mb, the subsequent νFeHis
evolution is very small, 1 cm–1, but in Hb νFeHis
drops by ∼6 cm–1 within ∼70 ns, corresponding
to the lifetime of the first tertiary intermediate detected by UVrR
spectroscopy,[70,71,101] designated Rdeoxy. This intermediate is associated with
the breaking of interhelical H-bonds involving the E and F helices.
Thus, Hb has a built-in resistance to heme relaxation, which is absent
in Mb (which does not have the same interhelical H-bonds[102]).From previous studies, it is known
that an invariant valine residue
on the E helix (Valα62 and Valβ67, Figure 9) provides the main steric contact with ligands bound to the
heme, and that loss of this contact upon deligation impels E helix
displacement.[73,103] Our previous UVrR study in gels
showed that the E helix displacement precedes the F helix displacement.[17] These two displacements are associated with
successive stages of νFeHis lowering. Thus, the deligation-induced
Fe out-of-plane movement begins in concert with the E helix displacement,
and then increases as the F helix is displaced.While the helix
displacements are common to both chains (as evidenced
by separate UVrR signal disappearances when the interhelical H-bond
partners are separately mutated in the two chains[104−106]), the PELE computations reveal that they are guided in different
directions within the tetramer. In the β chain, the E and F
helices move in the same direction, so that the Fe–His bond
orientation is unaltered. The modest νFeHis lowering associated
with this shift can be attributed to enhanced heme out-of-plane distortion,
due to steric contacts. In contrast the E and F helices move in orthogonal
directions for the α chain, producing heme distortion and tilting
of the Fe–His bond, and a more pronounced lowering of νFeHis.
These differing relative displacements may be guided by differing
packing arrangements in the EF corner, and with differing orientations
of H-bonds and salt bridges connecting the H helix with the F and
A helices (Figure 9).
Coupling of Tertiary and
Quaternary Motions
Gel encapsulation
shows that the β chain νFeHis evolves faster in the β
than in the α chains, when the quaternary structure is frozen
(Figure 3). The two time constants are 5×
and 2× shorter for β than for α (Table 1). The solution pump–probe measurements (Figure 3) show that, when the constraint on quaternary motion
is removed, the α chain νFeHis remains at its R state
value until the final stage (20 μs) of the quaternary transition
(the switch), whereas the β chain time course shows an inflection
at the time (3 μs) of the first quaternary stage (the hinge),
before finishing the β νFeHis shift to its low affinity
value, in concert with the switch.These results are in remarkable
accord with the allosteric pathway computed by Fischer et al.,[13] using the conjugate peak refinement (CPR) method.[107] In this pathway, the quaternary transition
occurs in two steps, as anticipated by the UVrR results.[10] In the R–T direction, the first step,
Q2 (numbered in the reverse direction), produces a much larger change
in quaternary structure than the second step, Q1. This prediction
accords with the results of time-resolved WAXS (wide-angle X-ray scattering)
measurements,[12] in which the main shape
change of the Hb tetramers was found at 3 μs, coincident with
the UVrR-detected hinge step. Q2 is found by CPR to involve a 6°
rotation of one αβ dimer against the other, with altered
α1β2 contacts in the hinge region. The β chains
move apart.Q2 is preceded by significant alteration in the
β chain tertiary
structure, with little tertiary change in the α chains.[8] This prediction is in accord with our findings
that in gels, νFeHis evolves faster in β than in α
chains, while in solution, the νFeHis progress curve shows an
inflection at 3 μs (Q2) for β but not for α chains.In the second step, Q1, the α chains move farther apart,
and rotate 3° relative to the β chains, bringing the switch
contacts into register at the α1β2 interface, consistent with the UVrR switch signal at 20 μs.[5] Q1 is accompanied by a major change in the α
chain tertiary structure, consistent with the large change in α
chain νFeHis at 20 μs.The picture that emerges
from these experimental and computational
results is that deligation within the R structure induces a faster
tertiary response in the β than in the α chains, whether
the quaternary motion is constrained or not. A possible reason is
that the β chain has a longer CD loop at the end of the E helix
(Figure 9), providing flexibility, and perhaps
allowing a faster E helix response to deligation than in the more
restricted α chain. The role of the CD loop in the dynamics
of Mb, whose chain movements are similar to those of the Hb β
chain has been discussed in previous work.[33] In solution, without external restraint on the quaternary motion,
the β chain tertiary motion drives rotation of the αβ
dimers around the hinge. Subsequently, the slower tertiary motion
of the α chains drives reorientation of the α chains,
closing the switch and completing the R–T transition.In the T–R direction, the CPR-computed trajectory is reversed.
Experimentally, the T–R sequence has not been monitored in
solution, because ligation is slower than the protein structure changes.
In gels, these changes are slowed sufficiently to allow spectroscopic
observation following ligation of deoxyHb with CO. There are small
but prompt UVrR signal changes associated with both the switch and
hinge contacts, indicating that ligation immediately loosens the T-state
quaternary contacts.[17] The small UVrR signals
only approach the amplitude expected for the quaternary transition
after about a week,[17] while much earlier
changes are seen in the photoproduct νFeHis, which evolve from
low to high values on the same time scale as the opposite changes
seen upon deligation of HbO2 gels. In the T–R direction,
however, there is no significant rate difference between the α
and β chains.Thus, the experimentally monitored T–R
changes in the gels
are not quite the reverse of the R–T changes. Ligation-induced
forces first weaken the quaternary contacts, then impel tertiary evolution
within both chains, more-or-less simultaneously, after which the quaternary
transition is completed. The discrepancy with the CPR trajectory is
understandable, since the CPR method does not permit changes in heme
ligation. The trajectory was computed for unligated Hb transitioning
between T and R quaternary structure. The gel experiments indicate
that ligation within the T structure requires loosening of the quaternary
contacts before evolution toward the R structure. This inference is
strongly supported by the reported structure of a deoxyHb crystal
that is oxygenated at low temperature.[108] All four hemes are ligated by O2, and quaternary contacts
are strained at both the switch and the hinge. Moreover, the Fe–His
bond is lengthened in the α chains, while the heme is buckled
in the β chains, providing a structural explanation of the initially
low photoproduct νFeHis values in the freshly ligated gels.
Implications for the Tertiary Two State Model
The tertiary
two-state (TTS) model posits that low- and high-affinity tertiary
structures, t and r, can coexist within each quaternary structure,
which bias the tertiary populations.[27] The
r and t structures are favored in the R and T states, respectively,
but both are present in each state, their populations determining
the ligand binding partition function.The model was inspired
by the finding that when CO was bound to deoxyHb gels, recombination
following photolysis showed two phases, with rates that matched those
that had been associated with R- and T-state tetramers.[20] Since the gel kept the protein in the T state,
the faster R-like rate must have resulted from a reactive tertiary
structure.Our finding that νFeHis, a marker of heme reactivity,
evolves
toward an R-like value while the gel-constrained protein remains in
the T state, fully supports this view. Likewise its evolution toward
a T-like value while the protein remains in the R state supports the
basic tenet of the TTS model that both quaternary states harbor high-
and low-reactivity tertiary structures. The α and β subunit
νFeHis frequencies are essentially the same in the R state,
and although they differ substantially in the T state, the ligation
rate is similar, because of differing steric factors, as discussed
above. Consequently, it is not surprising that single R-like and T-like
rates were observed in the gel CO recombination experiments, despite
differing subunit structures.However, our computations indicate
that the intermediate tertiary
structure resulting from deligation of a single subunit only partially
resembles the tertiary structure found in the T state, even though
the correct νFeHis frequency shift is predicted. Thus, the R-state
t structure (tR) of the TTS model is quite different from
the T-state t structure (tT), although the two structures
are functionally equivalent. That the complete tertiary change is
not likely to occur within a given quaternary structure seems reasonable.
The monomers are not independent but interact with intermolecular
contacts; therefore, their structural change should be correlated
to the whole tetramer rearrangement in space. A recent MD study[109] showed that during the T → R transition,
the Hb subunits approach the R-like conformation only in the final
stage of the quaternary change. Most likely the R- and T-state r (rR and rT) structures are also different. It appears
that the Hb architecture is designed to allow ligation and deligation
to induce tertiary changes in the heme surroundings that shift the
subunit reactivity between low and high values, while leaving the
subunit as a whole in an intermediate tertiary configuration. These
surroundings, the E and F helices and the FG corner, correspond to
the “allosteric core” identified many years ago by Gelin
and Karplus[16] in their pioneering molecular
mechanics study of Hb.Subsequent rearrangement of the tertiary
configuration accompanies
the quaternary shift between R and T, but is without further effect
on heme reactivity. This separation of functional response between
the two phases of tertiary change is what makes the TTS model viable.
Role of Effectors
Polyanionic effectors like BPG (2,3-bisphosphoglycerate)
and IHP stabilize the T quaternary structure of Hb by binding to its
central cavity, which is lined with cationic sites.[110] This cavity narrows in the R state, expelling the effector.
IHP addition to deoxyHb has little effect on νFeHis, in either
the α or β chain. It also has minimal effects on the kinetics
of νFeHis evolution for the HbCO photoproduct in T-state gels,
again for either chain. Thus, in the T state, IHP does not alter heme
reactivity and must exert its influence on ligand affinity through
other structural mechanisms. (Viapianni et al.[20] reported that a combination of strong effector molecules,
IHP and bezafibrate, suppressed the faster R-like CO recombination
rate in T-state HbCO gels. We were unable to explore this combination
in our experiments because of strong Raman scattering from bezafibrate.)In the R state, however, IHP dramatically lowers νFeHis and
accelerates its evolution following deligation. This effect is consistent
with Yonetani’s observations of large effector-induced affinity
lowering within the R state.[111] Long ago,
Marden et al. showed that effectors lower the last of the four ligand
binding equilibrium constants when Hb is clearly in the R state. Marden
concluded that while effectors influence the T-state affinity and
the allosteric equilibrium, they have an even larger effect on R state
affinity.We now find that the R state IHP effect on νFeHis
is largely
localized to the α chains. Consistent with this finding, an
NMR study of HbCO (R state) by Ho and co-workers[112] found that IHP greatly increases conformational dynamics
around the interdimer interface, especially in the F helix and FG
corner of the α chains. What accounts for these α-specific
effects? No crystal structure is available for IHP bound near the
α subunits in an R state Hb tetramer. However, we note that
when HbO2 was crystallized from phosphate buffer at pH
8.5, a phosphate ion was bound in the cleft between the α chains,
bridging the two Lysα99 side chains (PDB 1HHO),[113] which are near the FG corner (Figure 11). This is also one of the sites that Fan et al.[114] found to be consistent with their NMR study
of IHP binding to HbCO.
Figure 11
Superposition of the Hb structures with bound phosphate,
aligned
via the Cα atoms of both α chains, showing the displacement
of the FG region and the F helix between native HbO2 (orange;
PDB 1HHO(113)) and the Lysα99-fructosyl derivative
(cyan; PDB 3B75(115)).
Another crystal structure, in which
Lysα99 has been derivatized
with fructose (PDB 3B75),[115] shows displacement of the FG corner
and the F helix (Figure 11), resulting in tilting
of the Fe–His bond (the “C” pyrrolenitrogen–iron–His
Nε angle decreasing to 82° from 92° in the HbO2 structure) and also of the proximal imidazole ring with respect
to the Fe–His bond, the Fe–N–Cδ(imidazole)
angle increasing from 127° in the HbO2 structure (essentially
its normal 126° value) to 144° in the fructosyl derivative.
We speculate that the combination of phosphate and a nearby fructose
mimics binding of the bulky IHP molecule in the R state α cleft,
resulting in similar helix displacement and proximal His tilting,
with consequent lowering of the α chain νFeHis. Thus,
the availability of the inter-Lysα99 binding site may account
for the strong α-specific IHP influence on heme reactivity in
the R state.Superposition of the Hb structures with bound phosphate,
aligned
via the Cα atoms of both α chains, showing the displacement
of the FG region and the F helix between native HbO2 (orange;
PDB 1HHO(113)) and the Lysα99-fructosyl derivative
(cyan; PDB 3B75(115)).
Conclusions
Combining the available experimental and
computational results,
we obtain the following view of the mechanism of Hb allostery:(1) Ligand detachment from R-state ligated protein produces unrelaxed
deoxy-heme, with a compressed Fe–His bond in Hb, but not in
Mb. The immediate protein environment relaxes in tens of nanoseconds
in Hb, but is already relaxed by 2 ps in Mb.(2) Subsequent
evolution within the R state produces an intermediate
tertiary structure, with functional properties that are associated
with the T state. In the β chains, the packing of surrounding
residues enhances the out-of-plane distortion of the deoxy-heme, while
in the α chains, orthogonal motions of the E and F helices produce
Fe–His bond tilting as well as heme distortion.(3) Structural
evolution is faster for the β than the α
chains. In solution, the β chain evolution induces the main
quaternary transition, at 3 μs, during which the αβ
dimers rotate, and establish the T “hinge” contacts
between the β1 C helix and the α2 FG corner. The α
chain evolution induces the second transition, at 20 μs, during
which the α chains rotate into their final position, establishing
the T “switch” contacts between the α2 C helix
and the β1 FG corner.(4) In the reverse direction, ligation
in the gel-encapsulated
T state requires loosening of quaternary contacts, but tertiary structures
then evolve from low to high-affinity function, in this case at essentially
the same rate for α and β chains, before the quaternary
transitions. The structure sequence has not been monitored in solution
because ligation is slower than protein structure change.(5)
The finding that intermediate tertiary structures can have
low or high heme reactivity within both quaternary states supports
the tertiary two-state model of ligand binding, although it is clear
that the intermediate structures are not the same as the end-state
tertiary structures. In other word, rR and tR are not the same as rT and tT.(6) The
allosteric effector IHP has a large effect on R state heme
reactivity, specifically in the α chains. This effect is suggested
to result from IHP binding to the two facing Lysα99 residues
in the cleft between the α chains, resulting in displacement
of the F helix and FG corner that tilt the Fe–imidazole linkage,
and weaken the Fe–His bond. IHP has little effect on heme reactivity
in the T state, but instead stabilizes the T structure.Many
pieces of the allosteric puzzle are still missing, particularly
the role of partially ligated states, and the mechanisms by which
the intermediate tertiary structures induce the quaternary transitions.Historically, hemoglobin has served as a model for other allosteric
proteins. It may be that access to intermediate tertiary structures
with functional properties characteristic of end-state quaternary
structures is a general property of allosteric systems.
Authors: Gurusamy Balakrishnan; Xiaojie Zhao; Edyta Podstawska; Leonard M Proniewicz; James R Kincaid; Thomas G Spiro Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2009-04-14 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Raymond M Esquerra; Bushra M Bibi; Pooncharas Tipgunlakant; Ivan Birukou; Jayashree Soman; John S Olson; David S Kliger; Robert A Goldbeck Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Cristiano Viappiani; Stefania Abbruzzetti; Luca Ronda; Stefano Bettati; Eric R Henry; Andrea Mozzarelli; William A Eaton Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 11.205