Literature DB >> 2488151

Impact of image size on effectiveness of digital imaging systems.

P D Fisher1, G W Brauer.   

Abstract

Radiologists detect small diagnostic signals in radiographic film images by altering the distance between the eye and the image, effectively zooming in on a particular detail. Details thus enlarged are more perceptible to the viewer. Considering that conventional film images are nearly life-size, the potential for increasing the detection of small signals in this manner is high. Digital images, however, presented in video format are usually smaller than life-size, sometimes more than 50% smaller. While local enlargements using computer-based imaging systems are extremely useful, the radiologist cannot examine a whole, life-size image. The importance of the latter in the diagnostic process is revealed in detection studies using the same images of a chest phantom with small nodular inclusions, in different size formats. A clear positive correlation exists between overall image size and the detection of signals that are of a diagnostically-relevant size. While it is widely accepted that image fidelity is an important determinant in the clinical acceptability of digital radiography, digital image displays should also be large enough to display life-size images.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2488151     DOI: 10.1007/bf03168014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  8 in total

1.  Detection accuracy in chest radiography.

Authors:  J E Gray; K W Taylor; B B Hobbs
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Signal detection in digital chest-phantom images acquired with an image intensifier.

Authors:  G W Brauer; P D Fisher; J A Hanley; G W Ritchie
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Digital gastrointestinal imaging: the effect of pixel size on detection of subtle mucosal abnormalities.

Authors:  D J Kastan; L V Ackerman; P J Feczko
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 8. Detection of simulated low-contrast objects in digital subtraction angiographic images.

Authors:  K Ohara; H P Chan; K Doi; M L Giger; H Fujita
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1986 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Total digital radiology department: spatial resolution requirements.

Authors:  G W Seeley; H D Fisher; M O Stempski; M Borgstrom; J Bjelland; M P Capp
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Spatial resolution requirements for digital chest radiographs: an ROC study of observer performance in selected cases.

Authors:  P M Lams; M L Cocklin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Medical imaging, vision, and visual psychophysics.

Authors:  C C Jaffe
Journal:  Med Radiogr Photogr       Date:  1984

8.  Effect of size and position on chest lesion detection.

Authors:  C A Kelsey; R D Moseley; B G Brogdon; D G Bhave; J Hallberg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 3.959

  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  Investigation of optimal viewing size for detecting nodular ground-glass opacity on high-resolution computed tomography with cine-mode display.

Authors:  Michihiro Yamaguchi; Yuichi Bessho; Tatsuro Inoue; Yoshiyuki Asai; Tomoshige Matsumoto; Kenya Murase
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2010-08-19

Review 2.  Literature review: picture archiving and communication system.

Authors:  U P Schmiedl; A H Rowberg
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  A design for a picture archiving communication system central storage facility.

Authors:  G E Houtekamer; L J Franken; G L Reijns; W J Stut
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Digital chest imaging using a 57-cm image intensifier: a receiver-operating characteristic study of user performance.

Authors:  G W Brauer; P D Fisher; D B Pengelly; G W Ritchie
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Digital image display station performance requirements based on physician experience with a prototype system.

Authors:  P Fisher; B Grover; G Brauer; G Ritchie
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Double-contrast barium enema study with computed radiography: assessment in detection of colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Y Okada; S Kusano; T Endo
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Investigation of optimal display size for viewing T1-weighted MR images of the brain using a digital contrast-detail phantom.

Authors:  Hideki Fujita; Nao Kuwahata; Hiroyuki Hattori; Hiroshi Kinoshita; Haruyuki Fukuda
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.