Literature DB >> 20820964

Investigation of optimal viewing size for detecting nodular ground-glass opacity on high-resolution computed tomography with cine-mode display.

Michihiro Yamaguchi1, Yuichi Bessho, Tatsuro Inoue, Yoshiyuki Asai, Tomoshige Matsumoto, Kenya Murase.   

Abstract

We evaluated the effect of the displayed image sizes on observers' ability to detect nodular ground-glass opacity (n-GGO) on CT and investigated the optimal viewing size for soft-copy reading at CT screening for lung cancer. A total of 46 patients' high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) images (22 patients with one GGO; 24 without GGO) were displayed on a monochromatic liquid crystal display monitor at a resolution of 1,200 × 1,600. HRCT was presented on the screen with cine-mode display. We compared two viewing sizes (original size, i.e., the image displayed with a zoom factor of 1 in which each pixel value in the image is displayed as one pixel on the display: 13 cm × 13 cm; fit size, i.e., by zooming the captured image until it occupies the entire screen: 30 cm × 30 cm) in terms of radiologists' performance for detecting n-GGO on HRCT and the viewing times required for soft-copy reading decisions. Observer performance was analyzed in terms of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. A statistically significant improvement was found with the original size in the average area-under-the-ROC curve values for the accuracy of diagnosis and the viewing times compared to the fit size (P < 0.05). The original size with cine-mode display leads to increased lung GGO detection at CT screening for lung cancer, and the reduced time spent performing the diagnosis offers cost savings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20820964     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-010-0099-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  19 in total

1.  Investigation of optimal display size for detecting ground-glass opacity on high resolution computed tomography using a new digital contrast-detail phantom.

Authors:  Michihiro Yamaguchi; Hideki Fujita; Yuichi Bessho; Tatsuro Inoue; Yoshiyuki Asai; Kenya Murase
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Aldo Badano; Dev Chakraborty; Ken Compton; Craig Cornelius; Kevin Corrigan; Michael J Flynn; Bradley Hemminger; Nick Hangiandreou; Jeffrey Johnson; Donna M Moxley-Stevens; William Pavlicek; Hans Roehrig; Lois Rutz; Jeffrey Shepard; Robert A Uzenoff; Jihong Wang; Charles E Willis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Impact of hard-copy size on observer performance in digital chest radiography.

Authors:  C M Schaefer; M Prokop; J W Oestmann; W Wiesmann; B Haubitz; A Meschede; S Reichelt; E Schirg; H S Stender; M Galanski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Influence of CT image size and format on accuracy of lung nodule detection.

Authors:  S E Seltzer; P F Judy; U Feldman; L Scarff; F L Jacobson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method for statistical analysis of multireader, multimodality receiver operating characteristic data: validation with computer simulation.

Authors:  C A Roe; C E Metz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Impact of image size on effectiveness of digital imaging systems.

Authors:  P D Fisher; G W Brauer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Interpretation time of serial chest CT examinations with stacked-metaphor workstation versus film alternator.

Authors:  D V Beard; P L Molina; K E Muller; K M Denelsbeck; B M Hemminger; J R Perry; M P Braeuning; D H Glueck; W D Bidgood; M Mauro
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Receiver operating characteristic evaluation of computer display of adult portable chest radiographs.

Authors:  E A Krupinski; K Maloney; S C Bessen; M P Capp; K Graham; R Hunt; P Lund; T Ovitt; J R Standen
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography(MDCT). ICRP Publication 102.

Authors:  J Valentin
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

10.  Spiral CT of the chest: comparison of cine and film-based viewing.

Authors:  S E Seltzer; P F Judy; D F Adams; F L Jacobson; P Stark; R Kikinis; R G Swensson; S Hooton; B Head; U Feldman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  1 in total

1.  Does preference influence performance when reading different sizes of cranial computed tomography?

Authors:  Antje C Venjakob; Tim Marnitz; Lavier Gomes; Claudia R Mello-Thoms
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-12-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.