Literature DB >> 3940365

Spatial resolution requirements for digital chest radiographs: an ROC study of observer performance in selected cases.

P M Lams, M L Cocklin.   

Abstract

Thirty-eight selected clinical radiographs were digitized and displayed on a 1,024-line monitor at pixel sizes of 1.6, 0.8, 0.4, and 0.2 mm. Eighteen experienced radiologists assessed the radiographs and digital images, which included 12 examples of abnormal solitary nodular density, ten examples of septal lines, and 16 controls, six of which showed diffuse lung abnormalities. For each level of spatial resolution and for film reading, observers gave their decision confidence on a sliding scale of probability. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated from these data. It was found that while spatial resolution requirements for solitary nodules were not critical for pixel sizes at or below 0.8 mm, the requirement for septal lines was likely to be 0.4 mm (1.25 line pairs/mm).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3940365     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.158.1.3940365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  15 in total

Review 1.  Literature review: picture archiving and communication system.

Authors:  U P Schmiedl; A H Rowberg
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Computed radiography in neonatal intensive care.

Authors:  L Merlo; S Bighi; P M Cervi; L Lupi
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1991

Review 3.  Chest imaging within the radiology department by means of photostimulable phosphor computed radiography: a review.

Authors:  H Blume; R G Jost
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Two K versus 4 K storage phosphor chest radiography: detection performance and image quality.

Authors:  Claus Koelblinger; Mathias Prokop; Michael Weber; Johannes Sailer; Fabiola Cartes-Zumelzu; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Digital image analysis of radio-opacities in the paranasal sinuses using computed radiography.

Authors:  H Suzaki; K Abbey; Y Nomura
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  The digital imaging workstation. 1990.

Authors:  Ronald L Arenson; Dev P Chakraborty; Sridhar B Seshadri; Harold L Kundel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Radiology services for remote communities: cost minimisation study of telemedicine.

Authors:  P A Halvorsen; I S Kristiansen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-25

8.  Clinical assessment of Hokkaido University PACS.

Authors:  K Miyasaka; T Kudo
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Impact of image size on effectiveness of digital imaging systems.

Authors:  P D Fisher; G W Brauer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Signal detection in digital chest-phantom images acquired with an image intensifier.

Authors:  G W Brauer; P D Fisher; J A Hanley; G W Ritchie
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.