Literature DB >> 3809504

Digital gastrointestinal imaging: the effect of pixel size on detection of subtle mucosal abnormalities.

D J Kastan, L V Ackerman, P J Feczko.   

Abstract

Five radiographs of double-contrast colon examinations demonstrating subtle mucosal changes of inflammatory bowel disease and five radiographs of healthy colonic mucosa were selected and digitized to four levels of resolution. Pixel sizes of 0.1 mm, 0.2 mm, 0.4 mm, and 0.8 mm were used. Ten radiologists interpreted the images, which were displayed on laser-printed film. Analysis of variance with repeated measures was performed and receiver operator characteristic curves were determined. The results demonstrate that the sensitivity in detecting subtle mucosal abnormalities improved as the resolution improved, with the best sensitivity at the highest resolution; more experienced readers detected details well even at the poorer levels of resolution; the resolution necessary for successfully evaluating the colonic mucosa was lower than expected; and given low noise levels, the matrix size used in conventional television fluoroscopy would be adequate for mucosal evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3809504     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.162.3.3809504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  8 in total

Review 1.  Literature review: picture archiving and communication system.

Authors:  U P Schmiedl; A H Rowberg
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Evaluation of teleradiology for interpretation of intravenous urograms.

Authors:  E J Halpern; J H Newhouse; E S Amis; H W Lubetsky; R M Jaffe; P D Esser; P O Alderson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  The digital imaging workstation. 1990.

Authors:  Ronald L Arenson; Dev P Chakraborty; Sridhar B Seshadri; Harold L Kundel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Impact of image size on effectiveness of digital imaging systems.

Authors:  P D Fisher; G W Brauer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Digital videofluorography for direct digital spot filming of gastrointestinal studies.

Authors:  E Steiner; P R Mueller; P F Hahn; J Taaffe; J T Ferrucci
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1989

6.  Digital radiography of the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  P J Feczko; L V Ackerman; D J Kastan; R D Halpert
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1988-07

7.  Double-contrast barium enema study with computed radiography: assessment in detection of colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Y Okada; S Kusano; T Endo
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Diagnostic usefulness of chest computed radiography--film versus cathode-ray tube images.

Authors:  T Ishigaki; S Sakuma; T Endo; M Ikeda
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.056

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.