Literature DB >> 98003

Detection accuracy in chest radiography.

J E Gray, K W Taylor, B B Hobbs.   

Abstract

The detection accuracy of the diagnostic radiologist is important in everyday medical decision making. However, little work has been done relating the detection accuracy of the radiologist to the quality of the image. This study, using a thorax and lung phantom, simulated tissue-equivalent 6.4 mm lesions, and a 183 cm source-to-image distance, shows that the detection accuracy is not dependent on the focal spot size (over a range of 0.3-2.0 mm). However, the false positive rate increases when using small focal spots. In addition, the detection accuracy decreases with increasing root-mean-square (RMS) noise (a measure of the amount of quantum mottle in the image), while the false positive rate and intraobserver disagreement increase with increasing RMS noise. It is also shown that the nonradiologist responds to changes in noise in exactly the same way as the radiologist.

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 98003     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.131.2.247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  4 in total

1.  Impact of image size on effectiveness of digital imaging systems.

Authors:  P D Fisher; G W Brauer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Signal detection in digital chest-phantom images acquired with an image intensifier.

Authors:  G W Brauer; P D Fisher; J A Hanley; G W Ritchie
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  Diagnostic imaging in metastatic lung disease.

Authors:  E Dinkel; A Mundinger; D Schopp; G Grosser; K H Hauenstein
Journal:  Lung       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.584

4.  Causes of error in gastrointestinal radiology. II. Barium enema examination.

Authors:  D J Ott; D W Gelfand; N A Ramquist
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1980-04-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.