Literature DB >> 7948175

Double-contrast barium enema study with computed radiography: assessment in detection of colorectal polyps.

Y Okada1, S Kusano, T Endo.   

Abstract

Feasibility and diagnostic performance of digital radiography in gastrointestinal imaging have not been fully investigated. We performed double-contrast barium enema study with computed radiography (CR-DCBE) on a routine basis, and the efficacy of this system for detection of colorectal polyps was investigated. The files of 76 patients, who had undergone both CR-DCBE and colonoscopy, were reviewed by two observers who were blinded to the colonoscopic findings. The radiation dose of CR-DCBE was reduced to 50% of conventional film-screen system. By using colonoscopic findings as a reference, the sensitivity and positive predictive value for colorectal polyps were 66% to 71% and 32% to 41%, respectively. There was no significant interobserver difference. The use of postprocessing with gray-scale reversal and edge enhancement did not significantly improve the results. The sensitivity for polyps smaller than 1 cm was comparable with published data of conventional film-screen systems. Our preliminary results show that CR-DCBE has an acceptable sensitivity for detection of colorectal polyps. It is suggested that the use of CR is a promising approach to digital gastrointestinal radiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7948175     DOI: 10.1007/bf03168509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  17 in total

1.  Gastrointestinal examinations with digital radiography.

Authors:  M Takahashi; S Ueno; S Yoshimatsu; Y Higashida; T Tsuchigame; K Ito; M Hara; T Takada; M Kamiya; A Yoshida
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Impact of hard-copy size on observer performance in digital chest radiography.

Authors:  C M Schaefer; M Prokop; J W Oestmann; W Wiesmann; B Haubitz; A Meschede; S Reichelt; E Schirg; H S Stender; M Galanski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Matchmaking and McNemar in the comparison of diagnostic modalities.

Authors:  A J Dwyer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Comparison of barium enema nad colonoscopy in the detection of small colonic polyps.

Authors:  R F Thoeni; L Menuck
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Impact of image size on effectiveness of digital imaging systems.

Authors:  P D Fisher; G W Brauer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Digital radiography of subtle pulmonary abnormalities: an ROC study of the effect of pixel size on observer performance.

Authors:  H MacMahon; C J Vyborny; C E Metz; K Doi; V Sabeti; S L Solomon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Sensitivity of double-contrast barium study for left-colon polyps.

Authors:  D K Rex; G A Lehman; J C Lappas; R E Miller
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Computed radiography utilizing scanning laser stimulated luminescence.

Authors:  M Sonoda; M Takano; J Miyahara; H Kato
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Plain and computed radiography for detecting experimentally induced pneumothorax in cadavers: implications for detection in patients.

Authors:  J J Carr; J C Reed; R H Choplin; T L Pope; L D Case
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Double contrast enema and colonoscopy in polyp detection.

Authors:  F T Fork
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.