Literature DB >> 24875279

Influences on domestic well water testing behavior in a Central Maine area with frequent groundwater arsenic occurrence.

Sara V Flanagan1, Robert G Marvinney2, Yan Zheng3.   

Abstract

In 2001 the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) adopted a new standard for arsenic (As) in drinking water of 10 μg/L, replacing the old standard of 50 μg/L. However, for the 12% of the U.S. population relying on unregulated domestic well water, including half of the population of Maine, it is solely the well owner's responsibility to test and treat the water. A mailed household survey was implemented in January 2013 in 13 towns of Central Maine with the goal of understanding the population's testing and treatment practices and the key behavior influencing factors in an area with high well-water dependency and frequent natural groundwater As. The response rate was 58.3%; 525 of 900 likely-delivered surveys to randomly selected addresses were completed. Although 78% of the households reported that their well has been tested, half of it was more than 5 years ago. Among the 58.7% who believe they have tested for As, most do not remember the results. Better educated, higher income homeowners who more recently purchased their homes are most likely to have included As when last testing. While households agree that water and As-related health risks can be severe, they feel low personal vulnerability and there are low testing norms overall. Significant predictors of including As when last testing include: having knowledge that years of exposure increases As-related health risks (risk knowledge), knowing who to contact to test well water (action knowledge), believing that regular testing does not take too much time (instrumental attitude), and having neighbors who regularly test their water (descriptive norm). Homeowners in As-affected communities have the tendency to underestimate their As risks compared to their neighbors. The reasons for this optimistic bias require further study, but low testing behaviors in this area may be due to the influence of a combination of norm, ability, and attitude factors and barriers.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arsenic; Drinking water; Health behavior; Maine; Private well; Well testing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24875279      PMCID: PMC4245378          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  12 in total

Review 1.  Promoting the management and protection of private water wells.

Authors:  Hugh Simpson
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2004 Oct 22-Nov 26

2.  A systematic approach to behavior change interventions for the water and sanitation sector in developing countries: a conceptual model, a review, and a guideline.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Mosler
Journal:  Int J Environ Health Res       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Optimistic biases in public perceptions of the risk from radon.

Authors:  N D Weinstein; M L Klotz; P M Sandman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Predictors of home radon testing and implications for testing promotion programs.

Authors:  P M Sandman; N D Weinstein
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1993

Review 5.  Contamination of drinking-water by arsenic in Bangladesh: a public health emergency.

Authors:  A H Smith; E O Lingas; M Rahman
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.408

6.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of arsenic screening promotion in private wells: a quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Jolianne Renaud; Fabien Gagnon; Cécile Michaud; Sonia Boivin
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 2.483

7.  The effectiveness of educational interventions to enhance the adoption of fee-based arsenic testing in Bangladesh: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Christine Marie George; Jennifer Inauen; Sheikh Masudur Rahman; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.345

8.  Arsenic exposure in US public and domestic drinking water supplies: a comparative risk assessment.

Authors:  Arun Kumar; Probas Adak; Patrick L Gurian; John R Lockwood
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 5.563

9.  Public perceptions of drinking water: a postal survey of residents with private water supplies.

Authors:  Andria Q Jones; Catherine E Dewey; Kathryn Doré; Shannon E Majowicz; Scott A McEwen; Waltner-Toews David; Mathews Eric; Deborah J Carr; Spencer J Henson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Uranium and radon in private bedrock well water in Maine: geospatial analysis at two scales.

Authors:  Qiang Yang; Paul Smitherman; C T Hess; Charles W Culbertson; Robert G Marvinney; Andrew E Smith; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  28 in total

1.  Improve private well testing outreach efficiency by targeting households based on proximity to a high arsenic well.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Nicholas A Procopio; Steven E Spayd; Jessie A Gleason; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Effectiveness of table top water pitcher filters to remove arsenic from drinking water.

Authors:  Roxanna Barnaby; Amanda Liefeld; Brian P Jackson; Thomas H Hampton; Bruce A Stanton
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 6.498

3.  Health protective behavior following required arsenic testing under the New Jersey Private Well Testing Act.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Jessie A Gleason; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Megan Rockafellow-Baldoni; Stuart Braman; Steven N Chillrud; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.840

4.  Trends in urinary arsenic among the U.S. population by drinking water source: Results from the National Health and Nutritional Examinations Survey 2003-2014.

Authors:  Barrett Welch; Ellen Smit; Andres Cardenas; Perry Hystad; Molly L Kile
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  State-Level Policies Concerning Private Wells in the United States.

Authors:  Kristina Bowen; Tara Krishna; Lorraine Backer; Kate Hodgins; Lance A Waller; Matthew O Gribble
Journal:  Water Policy       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.434

Review 6.  Lessons Learned from Arsenic Mitigation among Private Well Households.

Authors:  Yan Zheng
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-09

7.  Private-well stewardship among a general population based sample of private well-owners.

Authors:  Kristen M C Malecki; Amy A Schultz; Dolores J Severtson; Henry A Anderson; James A VanDerslice
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Arsenic in private well water part 2 of 3: Who benefits the most from traditional testing promotion?

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Steven N Chillrud; James Ross; Stuart Braman; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  MDI Biological Laboratory Arsenic Summit: Approaches to Limiting Human Exposure to Arsenic.

Authors:  Bruce A Stanton; Kathleen Caldwell; Clare Bates Congdon; Jane Disney; Maria Donahue; Elizabeth Ferguson; Elsie Flemings; Meredith Golden; Mary Lou Guerinot; Jay Highman; Karen James; Carol Kim; R Clark Lantz; Robert G Marvinney; Greg Mayer; David Miller; Ana Navas-Acien; D Kirk Nordstrom; Sonia Postema; Laurie Rardin; Barry Rosen; Arup SenGupta; Joseph Shaw; Elizabeth Stanton; Paul Susca
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-09

10.  Arsenic in private well water part 3 of 3: Socioeconomic vulnerability to exposure in Maine and New Jersey.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Robert G Marvinney; Andrew E Smith; Steven N Chillrud; Stuart Braman; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 7.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.