Literature DB >> 8307767

Predictors of home radon testing and implications for testing promotion programs.

P M Sandman1, N D Weinstein.   

Abstract

Four data sets (total N = 3,329) are examined to identify the predictors of home radon testing. The data, interpreted in terms of a stage model of radon testing behavior, reveal that the variables predicting transitions between stages change as people move from one stage to the next. Thinking about radon testing (vs. never having even considered testing) is best predicted by general radon knowledge and by knowing other people who are concerned or have tested. Once contemplating testing, the decision to test is most closely related to the perceived likelihood of a home radon problem. Finally, there are few differences between people who say they have decided to test and those who have already tested. Instead situational factors--including difficulties in locating and choosing among test kits--appear to constitute the final barrier to testing. The ways in which these findings might assist the design of radon outreach programs are discussed, and specific outreach recommendations are advanced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8307767     DOI: 10.1177/109019819302000408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Q        ISSN: 0195-8402


  8 in total

1.  Protective eyewear promotion: applying principles of behaviour change in the design of a squash injury prevention programme.

Authors:  Rochelle Eime; Neville Owen; Caroline Finch
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Rural parents' perceptions of risks associated with their children's exposure to radon.

Authors:  Wade G Hill; Patricia Butterfield; Laura S Larsson
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.462

3.  The Household Risk Perception instrument and the Self-Efficacy in Environmental Risk Reduction instrument: psychometric testing using principal component analysis.

Authors:  Gail Oneal; Tamara Odom-Maryon; Julie Postma; Wade Hill; Patricia Butterfield
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Measuring public knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to radon to inform cancer control activities and practices.

Authors:  A Neri; C McNaughton; B Momin; M Puckett; M S Gallaway
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.770

5.  At the crossroads: Hazard assessment and reduction of health risks from arsenic in private well waters of the northeastern United States and Atlantic Canada.

Authors:  Yan Zheng; Joseph D Ayotte
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Risk-reduction strategies to expand radon care planning with vulnerable groups.

Authors:  Laura S Larsson
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 1.462

7.  Influences on domestic well water testing behavior in a Central Maine area with frequent groundwater arsenic occurrence.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Robert G Marvinney; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Arsenic in private well water part 1 of 3: Impact of the New Jersey Private Well Testing Act on household testing and mitigation behavior.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Steven N Chillrud; Stuart Braman; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 7.963

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.