Literature DB >> 3381955

Optimistic biases in public perceptions of the risk from radon.

N D Weinstein1, M L Klotz, P M Sandman.   

Abstract

Survey data were obtained from a random sample of 657 homeowners in New Jersey and also from 141 homeowners who had already monitored their homes for radon. People who had not tested tended to believe that they were less at risk than their neighbors, and they interpreted ambiguous predictors of home radon levels in ways that supported their beliefs of below-average risk. Residents who had already tested their homes were relatively accurate about the probability of health effects. In both groups less than half of those who knew that radon can cause lung cancer were willing to admit that it would be serious if they suffered health effects from this source. The optimistic biases of the public may hamper attempts to encourage home radon monitoring and to promote appropriate mitigation measures in homes with elevated radon concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3381955      PMCID: PMC1350336          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.78.7.796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  9 in total

1.  Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: conclusions from a community-wide sample.

Authors:  N D Weinstein
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1987-10

2.  Radon risk information and voluntary protection: evidence from a natural experiment.

Authors:  F R Johnson; R A Luken
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Health-protective behavior: an exploratory study.

Authors:  D M Harris; S Guten
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1979-03

4.  Why it won't happen to me: perceptions of risk factors and susceptibility.

Authors:  N D Weinstein
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Perceived driving safety and seatbelt usage.

Authors:  O Svenson; B Fischhoff; D MacGregor
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  1985-04

6.  Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems.

Authors:  N D Weinstein
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1982-12

7.  Car crashes: perceived vulnerability and willingness to pay for crash protection.

Authors:  L S Robertson
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1977

8.  A national study of health beliefs.

Authors:  J P Kirscht; D P Haefner; S S Kegeles; I M Rosenstock
Journal:  J Health Hum Behav       Date:  1966 winter

9.  Health status, perceptions of risk, and prevention interest for health and nonhealth problems.

Authors:  J A Kulik; H I Mahler
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.267

  9 in total
  11 in total

1.  Improve private well testing outreach efficiency by targeting households based on proximity to a high arsenic well.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Nicholas A Procopio; Steven E Spayd; Jessie A Gleason; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Rural parents' perceptions of risks associated with their children's exposure to radon.

Authors:  Wade G Hill; Patricia Butterfield; Laura S Larsson
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.462

3.  Health risk behaviors of Hispanics in the United States: findings from HHANES, 1982-84.

Authors:  G Marks; M Garcia; J M Solis
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  A comparison of perceived and objective CVD risk in a general population.

Authors:  M Niknian; S M McKinlay; W Rakowski; R A Carleton
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  At the crossroads: Hazard assessment and reduction of health risks from arsenic in private well waters of the northeastern United States and Atlantic Canada.

Authors:  Yan Zheng; Joseph D Ayotte
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Influences on domestic well water testing behavior in a Central Maine area with frequent groundwater arsenic occurrence.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Robert G Marvinney; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Personal fable: optimistic bias in cigarette smokers.

Authors:  Marianna Masiero; Claudio Lucchiari; Gabriella Pravettoni
Journal:  Int J High Risk Behav Addict       Date:  2015-03-20

8.  Radon Risk and Remediation: A Psychological Perspective.

Authors:  David Hevey
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-03-27

9.  Are People Optimistically Biased about the Risk of COVID-19 Infection? Lessons from the First Wave of the Pandemic in Europe.

Authors:  Kathleen McColl; Marion Debin; Cecile Souty; Caroline Guerrisi; Clement Turbelin; Alessandra Falchi; Isabelle Bonmarin; Daniela Paolotti; Chinelo Obi; Jim Duggan; Yamir Moreno; Ania Wisniak; Antoine Flahault; Thierry Blanchon; Vittoria Colizza; Jocelyn Raude
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  The Case for Universal Screening of Private Well Water Quality in the U.S. and Testing Requirements to Achieve It: Evidence from Arsenic.

Authors:  Yan Zheng; Sara V Flanagan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.