Literature DB >> 27142115

Arsenic in private well water part 2 of 3: Who benefits the most from traditional testing promotion?

Sara V Flanagan1, Steven E Spayd2, Nicholas A Procopio3, Steven N Chillrud4, James Ross5, Stuart Braman6, Yan Zheng7.   

Abstract

Arsenic, a toxic element naturally found in groundwater, is a public health concern for households drinking from wells. Private well water is not regulated to meet the federal drinking water arsenic Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of 10μg/L, or the more protective 5μg/L New Jersey (NJ) state MCL. In the absence of consistent private well regulation, public health efforts have relied on promoting testing in affected communities to various degrees of success. Few interventions publish results, and more often focus on the outcome of tested wells rather than who completed a test, and more importantly, who did not. Through our survey of randomly selected addresses (n=670) in 17 NJ towns we find higher rates of arsenic testing in areas with a history of testing promotion. However, we also see a stronger correlation of testing behavior with income and education in high promotion areas, suggesting that community engagement activities may be exacerbating socioeconomic status (SES) testing disparities. Well owners with a bachelor's degree had ten times greater odds of participating in our direct mail testing intervention than those with less education when tests cost $40. After all households (n=255) were offered free tests to overcome many of the usual testing barriers - awareness, convenience, and cost - only 47% participated and those who chose to return water samples were of higher income and education than those who did not. Our findings highlight that while efforts to promote and provide arsenic testing succeed in testing more wells, community testing interventions risk increasing SES disparities if those with more education and resources are more likely to take advantage of testing programs. Therefore, testing interventions can benefit by better targeting socially vulnerable populations in an effort to overcome SES-patterned self-selection when individuals are left alone with the responsibility of managing their drinking water quality.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arsenic; Drinking water; New Jersey; Private well; Socioeconomic status; Testing promotion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27142115      PMCID: PMC5191845          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  10 in total

Review 1.  Socioeconomic disparities in health: pathways and policies.

Authors:  Nancy E Adler; Katherine Newman
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  An investigation of bacteriological and chemical water quality and the barriers to private well water sampling in a Southwestern Ontario Community.

Authors:  April M Hexemer; Katarina Pintar; Tom M Bird; Shawn E Zentner; Henry P Garcia; Frank Pollari
Journal:  J Water Health       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.744

3.  Applying a health behavior theory to explore the influence of information and experience on arsenic risk representations, policy beliefs, and protective behavior.

Authors:  Dolores J Severtson; Linda C Baumann; Roger L Brown
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of arsenic screening promotion in private wells: a quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Jolianne Renaud; Fabien Gagnon; Cécile Michaud; Sonia Boivin
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 2.483

5.  The effectiveness of educational interventions to enhance the adoption of fee-based arsenic testing in Bangladesh: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Christine Marie George; Jennifer Inauen; Sheikh Masudur Rahman; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.345

6.  A Community-Driven Intervention in Tuftonboro, New Hampshire, Succeeds in Altering Water Testing Behavior.

Authors:  Michael P Paul; Pierce Rigrod; Steve Wingate; Mark E Borsuk
Journal:  J Environ Health       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.179

7.  Influences on domestic well water testing behavior in a Central Maine area with frequent groundwater arsenic occurrence.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Robert G Marvinney; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Arsenic in private well water part 3 of 3: Socioeconomic vulnerability to exposure in Maine and New Jersey.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Robert G Marvinney; Andrew E Smith; Steven N Chillrud; Stuart Braman; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Arsenic in private well water part 1 of 3: Impact of the New Jersey Private Well Testing Act on household testing and mitigation behavior.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Steven N Chillrud; Stuart Braman; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  The broad scope of health effects from chronic arsenic exposure: update on a worldwide public health problem.

Authors:  Marisa F Naujokas; Beth Anderson; Habibul Ahsan; H Vasken Aposhian; Joseph H Graziano; Claudia Thompson; William A Suk
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total
  12 in total

1.  Improve private well testing outreach efficiency by targeting households based on proximity to a high arsenic well.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Nicholas A Procopio; Steven E Spayd; Jessie A Gleason; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Health protective behavior following required arsenic testing under the New Jersey Private Well Testing Act.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Jessie A Gleason; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Megan Rockafellow-Baldoni; Stuart Braman; Steven N Chillrud; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.840

Review 3.  Lessons Learned from Arsenic Mitigation among Private Well Households.

Authors:  Yan Zheng
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-09

4.  Private-well stewardship among a general population based sample of private well-owners.

Authors:  Kristen M C Malecki; Amy A Schultz; Dolores J Severtson; Henry A Anderson; James A VanDerslice
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Arsenic in private well water part 3 of 3: Socioeconomic vulnerability to exposure in Maine and New Jersey.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Robert G Marvinney; Andrew E Smith; Steven N Chillrud; Stuart Braman; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Arsenic in private well water part 1 of 3: Impact of the New Jersey Private Well Testing Act on household testing and mitigation behavior.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Steven N Chillrud; Stuart Braman; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Arsenic Exposure and Cancer Risk Reduction with Local Ordinance Requiring Whole-House Dual-Tank Water Treatment Systems.

Authors:  Megan Rockafellow-Baldoni; Steven E Spayd; Jun-Yan Hong; Qingyu Meng; Pamela Ohman-Strickland; Mark G Robson
Journal:  Hum Ecol Risk Assess       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 5.190

8.  Factors influencing perceptions of private water quality in North America: a systematic review.

Authors:  Abraham Munene; David C Hall
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-10

9.  Hazard Ranking Method for Populations Exposed to Arsenic in Private Water Supplies: Relation to Bedrock Geology.

Authors:  Helen Crabbe; Tony Fletcher; Rebecca Close; Michael J Watts; E Louise Ander; Pauline L Smedley; Neville Q Verlander; Martin Gregory; Daniel R S Middleton; David A Polya; Mike Studden; Giovanni S Leonardi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  The Case for Universal Screening of Private Well Water Quality in the U.S. and Testing Requirements to Achieve It: Evidence from Arsenic.

Authors:  Yan Zheng; Sara V Flanagan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.