Literature DB >> 29884571

Health protective behavior following required arsenic testing under the New Jersey Private Well Testing Act.

Sara V Flanagan1, Jessie A Gleason2, Steven E Spayd3, Nicholas A Procopio3, Megan Rockafellow-Baldoni4, Stuart Braman5, Steven N Chillrud5, Yan Zheng6.   

Abstract

Exposure to naturally occurring arsenic in groundwater is a public health concern, particularly for households served by unregulated private wells. At present, one of the greatest barriers to exposure reduction is a lack of private well testing due to difficulties in motivating individual private well owners to take protective actions. Policy and regulations requiring testing could make a significant contribution towards universal screening of private well water and arsenic exposure reduction. New Jersey's Private Well Testing Act (PWTA) requires tests for arsenic during real estate transactions; however, the regulations do not require remedial action when maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) are exceeded. A follow-up survey sent to residents of homes where arsenic was measured above the state MCL in PWTA-required tests reveals a range of mitigation behavior among respondents (n = 486), from taking no action to reduce exposure (28%), to reporting both treatment use and appropriate maintenance and monitoring behavior (15%). Although 86% of respondents recall their well was tested during their real estate transaction, only 60% report their test showed an arsenic problem. Treatment systems are used by 63% of households, although half were installed by a previous owner. Among those treating their water (n = 308), 57% report that maintenance is being performed as recommended, although only 31% have tested the treated water within the past year. Perceived susceptibility and perceived barriers are strong predictors of mitigation action. Among those treating for arsenic, perceived severity is associated with recent monitoring, and level of commitment is associated with proper maintenance. Mention of a treatment service agreement is a strong predictor of appropriate monitoring and maintenance behavior, while treatment installed by a previous owner is less likely to be maintained. Though the PWTA requires that wells be tested, this study finds that not all current well owners are aware the test occurred or understood the implications of their arsenic results. Among those that have treatment installed to remove arsenic, poor monitoring and maintenance behaviors threaten to undermine intentions to reduce exposure. Findings suggest that additional effort, resources, and support to ensure home buyers pay attention to, understand, and act on test results at the time they are performed may help improve management of arsenic water problems over the long term and thus the PWTA's public health impact.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arsenic; New Jersey; Private well; Regulation; Water testing; Water treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29884571      PMCID: PMC6219474          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health        ISSN: 1438-4639            Impact factor:   5.840


  31 in total

Review 1.  Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review.

Authors:  Phil Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike Clarke; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Sarah Pratap; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-18

2.  Responses of 6500 households to arsenic mitigation in Araihazar, Bangladesh.

Authors:  Alisa Opar; Alex Pfaff; A A Seddique; K M Ahmed; J H Graziano; A van Geen
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2006-01-09       Impact factor: 4.078

3.  Can arsenic occurrence rates in bedrock aquifers be predicted?

Authors:  Qiang Yang; Hun Bok Jung; Robert G Marvinney; Charles W Culbertson; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  The role of commitment strength in enhancing safe water consumption: mediation analysis of a cluster-randomized trial.

Authors:  Jennifer Inauen; Robert Tobias; Hans-Joachim Mosler
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2013-09-24

5.  Applying a health behavior theory to explore the influence of information and experience on arsenic risk representations, policy beliefs, and protective behavior.

Authors:  Dolores J Severtson; Linda C Baumann; Roger L Brown
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  Influences on domestic well water testing behavior in a Central Maine area with frequent groundwater arsenic occurrence.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Robert G Marvinney; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Arsenic in private well water part 3 of 3: Socioeconomic vulnerability to exposure in Maine and New Jersey.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Robert G Marvinney; Andrew E Smith; Steven N Chillrud; Stuart Braman; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Arsenic in private well water part 1 of 3: Impact of the New Jersey Private Well Testing Act on household testing and mitigation behavior.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Steven N Chillrud; Stuart Braman; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Arsenic Exposure and Cancer Risk Reduction with Local Ordinance Requiring Whole-House Dual-Tank Water Treatment Systems.

Authors:  Megan Rockafellow-Baldoni; Steven E Spayd; Jun-Yan Hong; Qingyu Meng; Pamela Ohman-Strickland; Mark G Robson
Journal:  Hum Ecol Risk Assess       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 5.190

10.  Public perceptions of drinking water: a postal survey of residents with private water supplies.

Authors:  Andria Q Jones; Catherine E Dewey; Kathryn Doré; Shannon E Majowicz; Scott A McEwen; Waltner-Toews David; Mathews Eric; Deborah J Carr; Spencer J Henson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  1 in total

1.  Improve private well testing outreach efficiency by targeting households based on proximity to a high arsenic well.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Nicholas A Procopio; Steven E Spayd; Jessie A Gleason; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 7.963

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.