Literature DB >> 28605871

Private-well stewardship among a general population based sample of private well-owners.

Kristen M C Malecki1, Amy A Schultz2, Dolores J Severtson3, Henry A Anderson2, James A VanDerslice4.   

Abstract

Private well stewardship, including on-going testing and treatment, can ensure private well users are able to maintain source-water quality and prevent exposures to potentially harmful constituents in primary drinking water supplies. Unlike municipal water supplies, private well users are largely responsible for their own testing and treatment and well stewardship is often minimal. The importance of factors influencing regular testing, and treatment behaviors, including knowledge, risk perception, convenience and social norms, can vary by geography and population characteristics. The primary goals of this study were to survey a general statewide population of private well users in Wisconsin in order to quantify testing and treatment patterns and gather data on motivations and barriers to well stewardship. The majority of respondents reported using and drinking well water daily but only about one half of respondents reported testing their wells in the last ten years and of these, only 10% reported testing in the last 12months. Bacteria and nitrates were contaminants most often tested; and, a private laboratory most often conducted testing. The most commonly reported water treatment was a water softener. Living in a particular geographic region and income were the most significant predictors of water testing and treatment. Iron and hardness, which influence water aesthetics but not always safety, were the most commonly reported water quality problems. Health concerns or perceived lack thereof were, respectively, motivators and barriers to testing and treatment. Limited knowledge of testing and treatment options were also identified as barriers. Results confirm previous findings that well stewardship practices are minimal and often context specific. Understanding the target population's perceptions of risk and knowledge are important elements to consider in identifying vulnerable populations and developing education and policy efforts to improve well stewardship.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prevention; Private well; SHOW; Testing; Treatment; Well stewardship

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28605871      PMCID: PMC5662198          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  26 in total

1.  Importance of regular testing of private drinking water systems in North Carolina.

Authors:  Nirmalla Barros; Kenneth Rudo; Mina Shehee
Journal:  N C Med J       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

2.  Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  2000

Review 3.  Methods of conducting effective outreach to private well owners - a literature review and model approach.

Authors:  Lucinda Morris; Steve Wilson; Walton Kelly
Journal:  J Water Health       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.744

4.  The theory-based influence of map features on risk beliefs: self-reports of what is seen and understood for maps depicting an environmental health hazard.

Authors:  Dolores J Severtson; Christine Vatovec
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2012-06-20

5.  Meeting the public health challenge of protecting private wells: Proceedings and recommendations from an expert panel workshop.

Authors:  Mary A Fox; Keeve E Nachman; Breeana Anderson; Juleen Lam; Beth Resnick
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  The influence of environmental hazard maps on risk beliefs, emotion, and health-related behavioral intentions.

Authors:  Dolores J Severtson
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.228

7.  The Survey of the Health of Wisconsin (SHOW), a novel infrastructure for population health research: rationale and methods.

Authors:  F Javier Nieto; Paul E Peppard; Corinne D Engelman; Jane A McElroy; Loren W Galvao; Elliot M Friedman; Andrew J Bersch; Kristen C Malecki
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Contrasting regional and national mechanisms for predicting elevated arsenic in private wells across the United States using classification and regression trees.

Authors:  Logan Frederick; James VanDerslice; Marissa Taddie; Kristen Malecki; Josh Gregg; Nicholas Faust; William P Johnson
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  Arsenic in private well water part 1 of 3: Impact of the New Jersey Private Well Testing Act on household testing and mitigation behavior.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Steven N Chillrud; Stuart Braman; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Investigating public perceptions and knowledge translation priorities to improve water safety for residents with private water supplies: a cross-sectional study in Newfoundland and Labrador.

Authors:  Steven M Roche; Andria Jones-Bitton; Shannon E Majowicz; Katarina D M Pintar; David Allison
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  11 in total

1.  State-Level Policies Concerning Private Wells in the United States.

Authors:  Kristina Bowen; Tara Krishna; Lorraine Backer; Kate Hodgins; Lance A Waller; Matthew O Gribble
Journal:  Water Policy       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.434

2.  Dissolved Uranium and Arsenic in Unregulated Groundwater Sources - Western Navajo Nation.

Authors:  Lindsey Jones; Jonathan Credo; Roderic Parnell; Jani C Ingram
Journal:  J Contemp Water Res Educ       Date:  2020-06-01

3.  Uranium and arsenic unregulated water issues on Navajo lands.

Authors:  Jani C Ingram; Lindsey Jones; Jonathan Credo; Tommy Rock
Journal:  J Vac Sci Technol A       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 2.427

4.  Associations between private well water and community water supply arsenic concentrations in the conterminous United States.

Authors:  Maya Spaur; Melissa A Lombard; Joseph D Ayotte; David E Harvey; Benjamin C Bostick; Steven N Chillrud; Ana Navas-Acien; Anne E Nigra
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 10.753

5.  Development and Validation of an Environmental Health Literacy Assessment Screening Tool for Domestic Well Owners: The Water Environmental Literacy Level Scale (WELLS).

Authors:  Veronica L Irvin; Diana Rohlman; Amelia Vaughan; Rebecca Amantia; Claire Berlin; Molly L Kile
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Factors influencing perceptions of private water quality in North America: a systematic review.

Authors:  Abraham Munene; David C Hall
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-10

7.  Risk Communication and Factors Influencing Private Well Testing Behavior: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Sarah K Colley; Peter K M Kane; Jacqueline MacDonald Gibson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  The Survey of the Health of Wisconsin (SHOW) Program: An infrastructure for Advancing Population Health Sciences.

Authors:  Kristen M C Malecki; Maria Nikodemova; Amy A Schultz; Tamara J LeCaire; Andrew J Bersch; Lisa Cadmus-Bertram; Corinne D Engelman; Erika Hagen; Mari Palta; Ajay K Sethi; Matt C Walsh; F Javier Nieto; Paul E Peppard
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2021-04-07

9.  Methods for Estimating Locations of Housing Units Served by Private Domestic Wells in the United States Applied to 2010.

Authors:  Andrew Murray; Alexander Hall; James Weaver; Fran Kremer
Journal:  J Am Water Resour Assoc       Date:  2021-10

10.  Examining the dynamics of the relationship between water pH and other water quality parameters in ground and surface water systems.

Authors:  Benjamin M Saalidong; Simon Appah Aram; Samuel Otu; Patrick Osei Lartey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.