Literature DB >> 28719869

Effectiveness of table top water pitcher filters to remove arsenic from drinking water.

Roxanna Barnaby1, Amanda Liefeld2, Brian P Jackson3, Thomas H Hampton4, Bruce A Stanton5.   

Abstract

Arsenic contamination of drinking water is a serious threat to the health of hundreds of millions of people worldwide. In the United States ~3 million individuals drink well water that contains arsenic levels above the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 10μg/L. Several technologies are available to remove arsenic from well water including anion exchange, adsorptive media and reverse osmosis. In addition, bottled water is an alternative to drinking well water contaminated with arsenic. However, there are several drawbacks associated with these approaches including relatively high cost and, in the case of bottled water, the generation of plastic waste. In this study, we tested the ability of five tabletop water pitcher filters to remove arsenic from drinking water. We report that only one tabletop water pitcher filter tested, ZeroWater®, reduced the arsenic concentration, both As3+ and As5+, from 1000μg/L to < 3μg/L, well below the MCL. Moreover, the amount of total dissolved solids or competing ions did not affect the ability of the ZeroWater® filter to remove arsenic below the MCL. Thus, the ZeroWater® pitcher filter is a cost effective and short-term solution to remove arsenic from drinking water and its use reduces plastic waste associated with bottled water.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arsenic; Drinking water; Filtration; Water filter; Water quality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28719869      PMCID: PMC5571974          DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.07.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  13 in total

1.  Lead Contamination in Flint--An Abject Failure to Protect Public Health.

Authors:  David C Bellinger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  The global menace of arsenic and its conventional remediation - A critical review.

Authors:  Arpan Sarkar; Biswajit Paul
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 7.086

3.  Arsenic species in drinking water wells in the USA with high arsenic concentrations.

Authors:  Thomas J Sorg; Abraham S C Chen; Lili Wang
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Dissemination of well water arsenic results to homeowners in Central Maine: influences on mitigation behavior and continued risks for exposure.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Robert G Marvinney; Robert A Johnston; Qiang Yang; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Influences on domestic well water testing behavior in a Central Maine area with frequent groundwater arsenic occurrence.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Robert G Marvinney; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Assessing arsenic exposure in households using bottled water or point-of-use treatment systems to mitigate well water contamination.

Authors:  Andrew E Smith; Rebecca A Lincoln; Chris Paulu; Thomas L Simones; Kathleen L Caldwell; Robert L Jones; Lorraine C Backer
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Whole-house arsenic water treatment provided more effective arsenic exposure reduction than point-of-use water treatment at New Jersey homes with arsenic in well water.

Authors:  Steven E Spayd; Mark G Robson; Brian T Buckley
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  A cross-sectional study of well water arsenic and child IQ in Maine schoolchildren.

Authors:  Gail A Wasserman; Xinhua Liu; Nancy J Loiacono; Jennie Kline; Pam Factor-Litvak; Alexander van Geen; Jacob L Mey; Diane Levy; Richard Abramson; Amy Schwartz; Joseph H Graziano
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 5.984

9.  Home Water Treatment Habits and Effectiveness in a Rural Arizona Community.

Authors:  Nathan Lothrop; Sarah T Wilkinson; Marc Verhougstraete; Anastasia Sugeng; Miranda M Loh; Walter Klimecki; Paloma I Beamer
Journal:  Water (Basel)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.103

10.  Reduction in urinary arsenic with bottled-water intervention.

Authors:  Arun B Josyula; Hannah McClellen; Tracy A Hysong; Margaret Kurzius-Spencer; Gerald S Poplin; Stefan Stürup; Jefferey L Burgess
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.000

View more
  3 in total

1.  Assessment of inorganic contamination of private wells and demonstration of effective filter-based reduction: A pilot-study in Stokes County, North Carolina.

Authors:  Martha Scott Tomlinson; Paige Bommarito; Andrew George; Sarah Yelton; Peter Cable; Rachel Coyte; Jonathan Karr; Avner Vengosh; Kathleen M Gray; Rebecca C Fry
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 2.  The Sources of Chemical Contaminants in Food and Their Health Implications.

Authors:  Irfan A Rather; Wee Yin Koh; Woon K Paek; Jeongheui Lim
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 5.810

3.  Navigating a Two-Way Street: Metal Toxicity and the Human Gut Microbiome.

Authors:  Silke Schmidt
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 9.031

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.