Literature DB >> 24837105

Efficient visual-search model observers for PET.

H C Gifford1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Scanning model observers have been efficiently applied as a research tool to predict human-observer performance in F-18 positron emission tomography (PET). We investigated whether a visual-search (VS) observer could provide more reliable predictions with comparable efficiency.
METHODS: Simulated two-dimensional images of a digital phantom featuring tumours in the liver, lungs and background soft tissue were prepared in coronal, sagittal and transverse display formats. A localization receiver operating characteristic (LROC) study quantified tumour detectability as a function of organ and format for two human observers, a channelized non-prewhitening (CNPW) scanning observer and two versions of a basic VS observer. The VS observers compared watershed (WS) and gradient-based search processes that identified focal uptake points for subsequent analysis with the CNPW observer. The model observers treated "background-known-exactly" (BKE) and "background-assumed-homogeneous" assumptions, either searching the entire organ of interest (Task A) or a reduced area that helped limit false positives (Task B). Performance was indicated by area under the LROC curve. Concordance in the localizations between observers was also analysed.
RESULTS: With the BKE assumption, both VS observers demonstrated consistent Pearson correlation with humans (Task A: 0.92 and Task B: 0.93) compared with the scanning observer (Task A: 0.77 and Task B: 0.92). The WS VS observer read 624 study test images in 2.0 min. The scanning observer required 0.7 min.
CONCLUSION: Computationally efficient VS can enhance the stability of statistical model observers with regard to uncertainties in PET tumour detection tasks. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: VS models improve concordance with human observers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24837105      PMCID: PMC4075584          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20140017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  20 in total

1.  Decision strategies that maximize the area under the LROC curve.

Authors:  Parmeshwar Khurd; Gene Gindi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Estimation receiver operating characteristic curve and ideal observers for combined detection/estimation tasks.

Authors:  Eric Clarkson
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  The efficacy of diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  D G Fryback; J R Thornbury
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1991 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Assessment and validation of imaging methods and technologies.

Authors:  G Scott Gazelle; Steven E Seltzer; Philip F Judy
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Quantifying the clinical relevance of a laboratory observer performance paradigm.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty; T M Haygood; J Ryan; E M Marom; M Evanoff; M F McEntee; P C Brennan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model.

Authors:  K J Myers; H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Experimental comparison of lesion detectability for four fully-3D PET reconstruction schemes.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas; Michael E Casey; Noel F Black; James J Hamill; Vladimir Y Panin; Maurizio Conti
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Towards Visual-Search Model Observers for Mass Detection in Breast Tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Beverly A Lau; Mini Das; Howard C Gifford
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2013-03-21

10.  Impact of time-of-flight on PET tumor detection.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas; Michael E Casey; Maurizio Conti; Bjoern W Jakoby; Cristina Lois; David W Townsend
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  13 in total

1.  Lack of agreement between radiologists: implications for image-based model observers.

Authors:  Juhun Lee; Robert M Nishikawa; Ingrid Reiser; Margarita L Zuley; John M Boone
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-05-03

2.  Foveated Model Observers to predict human performance in 3D images.

Authors:  Miguel A Lago; Craig K Abbey; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-03-10

3.  Deep-learning-based model observer for a lung nodule detection task in computed tomography.

Authors:  Hao Gong; Qiyuan Hu; Andrew Walther; Chi Wan Koo; Edwin A Takahashi; David L Levin; Tucker F Johnson; Megan J Hora; Shuai Leng; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough; Lifeng Yu
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-06-30

4.  Task Equivalence for Model and Human-Observer Comparisons in SPECT Localization Studies.

Authors:  Anando Sen; Faraz Kalantari; Howard C Gifford
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 1.679

5.  Collimator optimization in myocardial perfusion SPECT using the ideal observer and realistic background variability for lesion detection and joint detection and localization tasks.

Authors:  Michael Ghaly; Yong Du; Jonathan M Links; Eric C Frey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Medical image quality metrics for foveated model observers.

Authors:  Miguel A Lago; Craig K Abbey; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-08-16

7.  Approximating the Ideal Observer for Joint Signal Detection and Localization Tasks by use of Supervised Learning Methods.

Authors:  Weimin Zhou; Hua Li; Mark A Anastasio
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Visual-search observers for assessing tomographic x-ray image quality.

Authors:  Howard C Gifford; Zhihua Liang; Mini Das
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Accounting for anatomical noise in search-capable model observers for planar nuclear imaging.

Authors:  Anando Sen; Howard C Gifford
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-01-26

10.  Foveated Model Observers for Visual Search in 3D Medical Images.

Authors:  Miguel A Lago; Craig K Abbey; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 10.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.