Literature DB >> 1907710

The efficacy of diagnostic imaging.

D G Fryback1, J R Thornbury.   

Abstract

The authors discuss the assessment of the contribution of diagnostic imaging to the patient management process. A hierarchical model of efficacy is presented as an organizing structure for appraisal of the literature on efficacy of imaging. Demonstration of efficacy at each lower level in this hierarchy is logically necessary, but not sufficient, to assure efficacy at higher levels. Level 1 concerns technical quality of the images; Level 2 addresses diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity associated with interpretation of the images. Next, Level 3 focuses on whether the information produces change in the referring physician's diagnostic thinking. Such a change is a logical prerequisite for Level 4 efficacy, which concerns effect on the patient management plan. Level 5 efficacy studies measure (or compute) effect of the information on patient outcomes. Finally, at Level 6, analyses examine societal costs and benefits of a diagnostic imaging technology. The pioneering contributions of Dr. Lee B. Lusted in the study of diagnostic imaging efficacy are highlighted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1907710     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9101100203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  229 in total

1.  Assessment of functional MR imaging in neurosurgical planning.

Authors:  C C Lee; H A Ward; F W Sharbrough; F B Meyer; W R Marsh; C Raffel; E L So; G D Cascino; C Shin; Y Xu; S J Riederer; C R Jack
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  The modern scientific physician: 4. The useful property of a diagnostic.

Authors:  O S Miettinen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-10-02       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The modern scientific physician: 3. Scientific diagnosis.

Authors:  O S Miettinen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-09-18       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Thromboembolic events after endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in two patients with antiphospholipid-antibody syndrome.

Authors:  L Pierot
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 5.  Temporomandibular joint diagnostics using CBCT.

Authors:  T A Larheim; A-K Abrahamsson; M Kristensen; L Z Arvidsson
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Head computed tomography scanning during pediatric neurocritical care: diagnostic yield and the utility of portable studies.

Authors:  Kerri L LaRovere; Molly S Brett; Robert C Tasker; Keith J Strauss; Jeffrey P Burns
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Do we need randomised trials to evaluate diagnostic procedures? Against.

Authors:  Peter E Valk
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-12-03       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Health technology assessment of PET in oncology: re Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003; 30:637-641.

Authors:  Finn Børlum Kristensen; Elizabeth Adams; Eduardo Briones; Damian Coburn; Karen Facey; Niels Würgler Hansen; Jetty Hoeksema; Berit Mørland
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  A follow-up report card on computer-assisted diagnosis--the grade: C+.

Authors:  Craig A Umscheid; C William Hanson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of EOS 2D/3D X-ray imaging system.

Authors:  Ros Wade; Huiqin Yang; Claire McKenna; Rita Faria; Nigel Gummerson; Nerys Woolacott
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.