Literature DB >> 24820439

Semantic preview benefit in reading English: The effect of initial letter capitalization.

Keith Rayner1, Elizabeth R Schotter1.   

Abstract

A major controversy in reading research is whether semantic information is obtained from the word to the right of the currently fixated word (word n + 1). Although most evidence has been negative in English, semantic preview benefit has been observed for readers of Chinese and German. In the present experiment, we investigated whether the discrepancy between English and German may be attributable to a difference in visual properties of the orthography: the first letter of a noun is always capitalized in German, but is only occasionally capitalized in English. This visually salient property may draw greater attention to the word during parafoveal preview and thus increase preview benefit generally (and lead to a greater opportunity for semantic preview benefit). We used English target nouns that can either be capitalized (e.g., We went to the critically acclaimed Ballet of Paris while on vacation.) or not (e.g., We went to the critically acclaimed ballet that was showing in Paris.) and manipulated the capitalization of the preview accordingly, to determine whether capitalization modulates preview benefit in English. The gaze-contingent boundary paradigm was used with identical, semantically related, and unrelated previews. Consistent with our hypothesis, we found numerically larger preview benefits when the preview/target was capitalized than when it was lowercase. Crucially, semantic preview benefit was not observed when the preview/target word was not capitalized, but was observed when the preview/target word was capitalized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24820439      PMCID: PMC4147079          DOI: 10.1037/a0036763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  23 in total

Review 1.  Parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Bernhard Angele; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Is emotional content obtained from parafoveal words during reading? An eye movement analysis.

Authors:  Jukka Hyönä; Tuomo Häikiö
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2005-12

3.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Semantic preview benefit during reading.

Authors:  Sven Hohenstein; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Parafoveal and foveal processing of abbreviations during eye fixations in reading: making a case for case.

Authors:  Timothy J Slattery; Elizabeth R Schotter; Raymond W Berry; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; D A Balota; A Pollatsek
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1986-12

7.  Integrating information across eye movements.

Authors:  K Rayner; G W McConkie; D Zola
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Synonyms Provide Semantic Preview Benefit in English.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Semantic and plausibility effects on preview benefit during eye fixations in Chinese reading.

Authors:  Jinmian Yang; Suiping Wang; Xiuhong Tong; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2010-11-18

10.  Lack of semantic parafoveal preview benefit in reading revisited.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Elizabeth R Schotter; Denis Drieghe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-08
View more
  16 in total

1.  The effect of contextual constraint on parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Michelle Lee; Michael Reiderman; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Are emojis processed like words?: Eye movements reveal the time course of semantic processing for emojified text.

Authors:  Eliza Barach; Laurie Beth Feldman; Heather Sheridan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-01-28

3.  Role of consciousness in temporal integration of semantic information.

Authors:  Yung-Hao Yang; Yung-Hsuan Tien; Pei-Ling Yang; Su-Ling Yeh
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  Parafoveal preview effects from word N + 1 and word N + 2 during reading: A critical review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Bernhard Angele
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

6.  It takes time to prime: semantic priming in the ocular lexical decision task.

Authors:  Renske S Hoedemaker; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Getting ahead of yourself: Parafoveal word expectancy modulates the N400 during sentence reading.

Authors:  Mallory C Stites; Brennan R Payne; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  [Localization of scotomas in AMD by reading test : Random series of words in standardized format].

Authors:  W Eisenbarth; U Pado; S Schriever; D Schötschel; N Feucht; M MacKeben
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  What Eye Movements Reveal about Deaf Readers.

Authors:  Nathalie N Bélanger; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-06

10.  Semantic and plausibility preview benefit effects in English: Evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Annie Jia
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.